Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Blended learning, e-learning and mobile learning in mathematics education

  • Survey Paper
  • Published:
ZDM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this literature survey we focus on identifying recent advances in research on digital technology in the field of mathematics education. To conduct the survey we have used internet search engines with keywords related to mathematics education and digital technology and have reviewed some of the main international journals, including the ones in Portuguese and Spanish. We identify five sub-areas of research, important trends of development, and illustrate them using case studies: mobile technologies, massive open online courses (MOOCs), digital libraries and designing learning objects, collaborative learning using digital technology, and teacher training using blended learning. These examples of case studies may help the reader to understand how recent developments in this area of research have evolved in the last few years. We conclude the report discussing some of the implications that these digital technologies may have for mathematics education research and practice as well as making some recommendations for future research in this area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguilar, M. S., & Puga, D. E. (2015). Mobile help seeking in mathematics: an exploratory study with Mexican engineering students. In H. Crompton & J. Traxler (Eds.), Mobile learning and mathematics. Foundations, design, and case studies (pp. 176–186). Florence, KY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2010). Learning on demand: online education in the United States, 2009. Newburyport: The Sloan Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altun, A., & Aşkar, P. (2008, 17–21 November). An ontological approach to designing learning objects. Paper presented at the E-Learn 2008, Las Vegas, NE, USA.

  • Atkins, D. E., Brown J. S., & Hammond A.L. (2007). A review of open educational resources (OER) movement: Achievements, challenges, and new opportunities. Resource document. The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. http://www.hewlett.org/uploads/files/ReviewoftheOERMovement.pdf.

  • Attwell, G. (2007). The personal learning environments—the future of e-learning? eLearning Papers, 2(1). http://elearningeuropa.info/files/media/media11561.pdf. Accessed 7 Mar 2013.

  • Baki, A., & Çakıroğlu, Ü. (2010). Learning objects in high school mathematics classrooms: implementation and evaluation. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1459–1469. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bicudo, M. A. V. (2014). Meta-análise: seu significado para a pesquisa qualitativa [Meta-synthesis: its meaning in the qualitative research]. Revemat: Revista Eletrônica de Educação Matemática, 9(0), 7–20. doi:10.5007/1981-1322.2014v9nespp7.

  • Boaler, J. (2014). How to learn math: for teachers and parents. Resource document. Stanford University. http://online.stanford.edu/course/how-to-learn-math-for-teachers-and-parents-s14.

  • Borba, M. C. (2012). Humans-with-media and continuing education for mathematics teachers in online environments. ZDM–The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44(6), 801–814. doi:10.1007/s11858-012-0436-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borba, M. C., & Almeida, H. R. F. L. (2015). As licenciaturas em matemática da Universidade Aberta do Brasil (UAB): uma visão a partir da utilização das tecnologias digitais [Pre-Service Mathematics Teacher Education in “Universidade Aberta do Brasil” (Open University of Brazil): a perspective regarding the use of digital Technologies]. São Paulo: Livraria da Física

  • Borba, M. C., Clarkson, P., & Gadanidis, G. (2013). Learning with the use of the Internet. In M. A. Ken Clements, A. J. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 691–720). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-4684-2_22.

  • Borba, M. C., & Gadanidis, G. (2008). Virtual communities and networks of practising mathematics. In K. Krainer & T. Wood (Eds.), The international handbook of mathematics teachers education. Participants in mathematics teacher education. Individual, teams, communities and networks (Vol. 3, pp. 181–206). Rotterdam/Taipei: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borba, M. C., & Lacerda, H. D. G. (2015). Políticas públicas e tecnologias digitais: um celular por aluno [Public Policies and Digital Technologies: a smartphone per student]. Educação Matemática Pesquisa, 17(3), 490–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borba, M. C., & Llinares, S. (2012). Online mathematics teacher education: overview of an emergent field of research. ZDM–The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44(6), 697–704. doi:10.1007/s11858-012-0457-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borba, M. C., Malheiros, A. P. S., & Zulatto, R. B. A. (2010). Online distance education (1st ed.). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borba, M. C., Scucuglia, R. R. S., & Gadanidis, G. (2014). Fases das tecnologias digitais em educação matemática: sala de aula e internet em movimento [Phases of digital technologies in mathematics education: the classroom and the Internet in motion] (1st ed.). Belo Horizonte: Autêntica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borba, M. C., & Villarreal, M. E. (2005). Humans-with-Media and the reorganization of mathematical thinking. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchem, I., Attwell, G., & Torres, R. (2011). Understanding personal learning environments: Literature review and synthesis through the activity theory lens. Paper presented at the The PLE Conference 2011, Southampton, UK.

  • Candela, L. et al. (2007). The DELOS digital library reference model: foundation for digital libraries, version 0.96. Resource document. European Commission within the Sixth Framework Programme. http://delosw.isti.cnr.it/files/pdf/ReferenceModel/DELOS_DLReferenceModel_096.pdf.

  • Cechinel, C., Sánchez-Alonso, S., & García-Barriocanal, E. (2011). Statistical profiles of highly-rated learning objects. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1255–1269. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatti, A. C., Agustiawan, M. R., Jarke, M., & Specht, M. (2010a). Toward a personal learning environment framework. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 1(4), 66–85. doi:10.4018/jvple.2010100105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatti, A. C., Agustiawan, M. R., Jarke, M., & Specht, M. (2010b). The 3P learning model. Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 74–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, P. D., Lambert, A. D., & Guidry, K. R. (2010). Engaging online learners: the impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1222–1232. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clay, E., Silverman, J., & Fischer, D. J. (2012). Unpacking online asynchronous collaboration in mathematics teacher education. ZDM–The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44(6), 761–773. doi:10.1007/s11858-012-0428-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements, M. A. K., Bishop A. J., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J., & Leung, F. K. S. (Eds.). (2013). Third international handbook of mathematics education. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-4684-2.

  • Clements, K., Pawlowski, J., & Manouselis, N. (2015). Open educational resources repositories literature review—towards a comprehensive quality approaches framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 51(Part B), 1098–1106. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coates, H., James, R., & Baldwin, G. (2005). A critical examination of the effects of learning management systems on university teaching and learning. Tertiary Education and Management, 11(1), 19–36. doi:10.1007/s11233-004-3567-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Electronic Information and Communication (2014). Mathematical massive open online courses (M-MOOCs): ICM 2014 panel brief. Resource document. International Mathematical Union. http://www.mathunion.org/fileadmin/CEIC/ICM_2014_panels/MOOCPanelBrief.pdf.

  • Conde, M. A., García, F. J., Alier, M., & Casany, M. J. (2011). Merging learning management systems and personal learning environments. Proceedings of the Personal Learning Environment Conference 2011, July 2011, Southampton, UK. http://journal.webscience.org/559/. Accessed 2 Oct 2014.

  • Crompton, H. (2013). A historical overview of mobile learning: toward learner-centered education. In Z. L. Berge & L. Y. Muilenburg (Eds.), Handbook of mobile learning (pp. 3–14). Florence: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crompton, H. (2015). Understanding angle and angle measure: a design-based research study using context aware ubiquitous learning. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 22(1), 19–30. doi:10.1564/tme_v22.1.02.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crompton, H., & Traxler, J. (Eds.). (2015). Mobile learning and mathematics. Foundations, design and case studies. Florence: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ambrosio, U., & Borba, M. C. (2010). Dynamics of change of mathematics education in Brazil and a scenario of current research. ZDM–The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 42(3), 271–279. doi:10.1007/s11858-010-0261-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daher, W. (2011). Learning mathematics in the mobile phone environment: students’ emotions. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 22(3), 357–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daher, W., & Baya’a, N. (2012). Characteristics of middle school students learning actions in outdoor mathematical activities with the cellular phone. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 31(3), 133–152. doi:10.1093/teamat/hrr018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drexler, W. (2010). The networked student model for construction of personal learning environments: balancing teacher control and student autonomy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3), 369–385. doi:10.14742/ajet.v26i3.1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, C. (2011). A comparison of traditional and blended learning in introductory principles of accounting course. American Journal of Business Education, 4(9), 1–10. doi:10.19030/ajbe.v4i9.5614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelbrecht, J., & Harding, A. (2005a). Teaching undergraduate mathematics on the Internet. Part 1: technologies and taxonomy. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58(2), 235–252. doi:10.1007/s10649-005-6456-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelbrecht, J., & Harding, A. (2005b). Teaching undergraduate mathematics on the Internet. Part 2: attributes and possibilities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58(2), 253–276. doi:10.1007/s10649-005-6457-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, C., Llinares, S., & Valls, J. (2012). Learning to notice students’ mathematical thinking through on-line discussions. ZDM–The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44(6), 747–759. doi:10.1007/s11858-012-0425-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, P. (2015). Flipping a math content course for pre-service elementary school teachers. Primus, 25(4), 369–380. doi:10.1080/10511970.2014.981902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, T., & Peng, L.-W. (2008). Mobile math: math educators and students engage in mobile learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 20(2), 69–80. doi:10.1007/s12528-008-9005-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, K. (2012). 10 reasons to flip. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 20–24. doi:10.1177/003172171209400205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadanidis, G. (2012). Why can’t I be a mathematician? For the Learning of Mathematics, 32(2), 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadanidis, G. (2013). Designing a Mathematics-for-All MOOC. In T. Bastiaens, & G. Marks (Eds.), Proceedings of e-learn: World conference on e-learning in corporate, government, healthcare and higher education, 2013 (pp. 704–710). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). http://www.editlib.org/p/114923. Accessed 28 July 2015.

  • Gadanidis, G., & Borba, M. (2008). Our lives as performance mathematicians. For the Learning of Mathematics, 28(1), 44–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadanidis, G., & Namukasa, I. (2007). Mathematics-for-teachers (and students). Journal of Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadanidis, G., Sedig, K., & Liang, H. N. (2004). Designing online mathematical investigation. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 23(3), 275–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Peñalvo, F. J., Conde, M. Á., Alier, M., & Casany, M. J. (2011). Opening learning management systems to personal learning environments. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 17(9), 1222–1240. doi:10.3217/jucs-017-09-1222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goos, M., & Geiger, V. (2012). Connecting social perspectives on mathematics teacher education in online environments. ZDM–The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44(6), 705–715. doi:10.1007/s11858-012-0441-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, A., & Engelbrecht, J. (2015). Personal learning network clusters: a comparison between mathematics and computer science students. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 173–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holubz, B.J. (2015). Mobilizing mathematics. Participants’ perspectives on Bring Your Own Device. In H. Crompton, & J. Traxler (Eds.), Mobile learning and mathematics. Foundations, design, and case studies (pp. 213–222). Florence, KY: Routledge.

  • IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee (2002). Draft standard for learning object metadata. Resource document. IEEE. http://129.115.100.158/txlor/docs/IEEE_LOM_1484_12_1_v1_Final_Draft.pdf. Accessed 29 Jan 2016.

  • Ivanova, M. (2009). From personal learning environment building to professional learning network forming. Proceedings of the 5th international conference eLearning and software for education (eLSE), issue: 01/2009, (27–32). https://adlunap.ro/else2009/papers/1001.1.Ivanova.pdf. Accessed 29 Jan 2016.

  • Johnson, M., & Liber, O. (2008). The personal learning environment and the human condition: from theory to teaching practice. Interactive Learning Environments, 16(1), 3–15. doi:10.1080/10494820701772652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J. H., Hassell, J. M., Webber, S. A., & Johnson, J. N. (2009). A comparison of academic performance in traditional and hybrid learning in a graduate accounting course: student satisfaction and course design issues. Journal of Accounting Education, 27(3), 147–154. doi:10.1016/j.jaccedu.2010.03.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilde, J., & Gonzales, L. (2015). A connective MOOC for k-12 science and mathematics teacher professional development in native American Pueblo schools. ICTD’15: Proceedings of the seventh international conference on information and communication technologies and development. doi:10.1145/2737856.2737871.

  • Kinshuk, D., Jesse, R. (2013). Mobile authoring of open educational resources as reusable learning objects. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(2), 28–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFee, S. (2013). Flipped learning. The Education Digest, November Issue, 13–18.

  • Lalonde, C. (2012). How important is Twitter in your personal learning network? eLearn Magazine. September 2012. http://elearnmag.acm.org/featured.cfm?aid=2379624. Accessed 1 Aug 2015.

  • Larkin, K., & Calder, N. (2015). Mathematics education and mobile technologies. Mathematics Education Research Journal,. doi:10.1007/s13394-015-0167-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, P. (1993). Tecnologias da Inteligência: O futuro do pensamento na era da informática. [Technologies of Intelligence: the future of thinking in the informatics era]. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Editora 34.

  • Llinares, S., Krainer, K., & Brown, L. (2014). Mathematics teachers and curricula. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 438–441). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_111.

  • Llinares, S., & Olivero, F. (2008). Virtual communities and networks of prospective mathematics teachers: technologies, interactions and new forms of discourse. In K. Krainer, & T. Wood (Eds.), The international handbook of mathematics teachers education. Volume 3. Participants in mathematics teacher education. individual, teams, communities and networks (pp. 155–179). Rotterdam/Taipei: Sense Publishers.

  • Martindale, T., & Dowdy, M. (2010). Personal learning environments. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.), Emerging technologies in distance education (177–193). Edmonton, Canada: AU Press, Athabasca University. http://www.aupress.ca/books/120177/ebook/09_Veletsianos_2010-Emerging_Technologies_in_Distance_Education.pdf. Accessed 29 Jan 2016.

  • McCulloch, R., & Rothschild, L. P. (2014). MOOCs: an inside view. Notices of the AMS, 61(8), 2–8. doi:10.1090/noti1147.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: the extensions of man. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meletiou-Mavrotheris, M., Mavrou, K., & Paparistodemou, E. (Eds.). (2015). Integrating touch-enabled and mobile devices into contemporary mathematics education. Hershey: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, C., Johnson, M., Sharples, P., Wilson, S., & Liber, O. (2006). Developing a reference model to describe the personal learning environment. In W. Nejdl & K. Tochtermann (Eds.), Innovative approaches for learning and knowledge sharing—First european conference on technology enhanced learning, ECTEL 2006 (pp. 506–511). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirriahi, N., Alonzo, D., McIntyre, S., Kligyte, G., & Fox, B. (2015). Blended learning innovations: leadership and change in one Australian institution. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 11(1), 4–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivier, B., & Liber, O. (2001). Lifelong learning: The need for portable personal learning environments and supporting interoperability standards. http://wiki.cetis.ac.uk/uploads/6/67/Olivierandliber2001.doc. Accessed 3 Mar 2008.

  • Owen, H., & Dunham, N. (2015). Reflections on the use of iterative, agile and collaborative approaches for blended flipped learning development. Education Sciences, 5(2), 85–105. doi:10.3390/educsci5020085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, P. (2014). Using iPad video evidence as a tool for reflection in primary teacher education. Research in Mathematics Education, 16(2), 206–207. doi:10.1080/14794802.2014.918341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, M. F. (2003). Online education and learning management systems: Global e-learning in a Scandinavian perspective. NKI Gorlaget: Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polsani, P. R. (2003). Use and abuse of reusable learning objects. Journal of Digital Information, 3(4). http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/viewArticle/89/88.

  • Roberts, N., & Vänskä, R. (2011). Challenging assumptions: mobile learning for mathematics project in South Africa. Distance Education, 32(2), 243–259. doi:10.1080/01587919.2011.584850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roger, T., & Johnson, D. W. (1988). Cooperative learning. Two heads learn better than one. IN CONTEXT, 18. http://www.context.org/iclib/ic18/johnson/. Accessed 13 Oct 2014.

  • Romberg (Chair), T. A. (1989). Curriculum and valuation standards for school mathematics. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, A. (2013). La reforma de la educación matemática en Costa Rica. Perspectiva de la praxis [The mathematics education reform in Costa Rica. Perspective of praxis]. Cuadernos de Investigación y Formación en Educación Matemática, Year 8, Special Number. http://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/cifem/article/view/11125.

  • Sarasty, M. F. S., & Fernández, M. F. B. (2015). Elgg social network software readjustment to mathematics education: a study case. Proceedings of 2015 10th Iberian conference on information systems and technologies (CISTI), 1–6. doi:10.1109/CISTI.2015.7170434.

  • Schrage, M. (2001). The relationship revolution. http://web.archive.org/web/20030602025739/, http://www.ml.com/woml/forum/relation.htm. Accessed 12 July 2008.

  • Sclater, N. (2008). Web 2.0, personal learning environments, and the future of learning management systems. Educause Center for Applied Research, Research Bulletin 13. http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/erb0813.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2016.

  • Skovsmose, O., & Borba, M. C. (2004). Research methodology and critical mathematics education. In P. Valero, & R. Zevenbergen (Eds.), Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education: Issues of power in theory and methodology (pp. 207–226). Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi:10.1007/1-4020-7914-1_17.

  • Smith, J., & Smith, R. (2012). Screen-capture instructional technology: a cognitive tool for designing a blended multimedia curriculum. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(3), 207–228. doi:10.2190/EC.46.3.a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. G., & Suzuki, S. (2015). Embedded blended learning within an Algebra classroom: a multimedia capture experiment. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 31(2), 133–147. doi:10.1111/jcal.12083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NGSS Lead States (2013). Next generation science standards: for states, by states. http://www.nextgenscience.org.

  • Swan, K., & Shea, P. (2005). The development of virtual learning communities. In S. R. Hiltz & R. Goldman (Eds.), Asynchronous learning networks: The research frontier (pp. 239–260). New York: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabbers, H., & Koeijer, B. (2010). Learner control in animated multimedia instructions. Instructional Science, 38(5), 441–453. doi:10.1007/s11251-009-9119-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Open University (2015). New MOOC—enhancing teacher education through OER: adapting and utilising OER from TESS-India. Resource document. The Open University. http://www.open.ac.uk/about/international-development/news/tess-india-mooc.

  • Tobin, D. R. (2000). All learning is self-directed: How organisations can support and encourage independent learning. Alexandria: ASTD Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toerner, G., & Arzarello, F. (2012). Grading mathematics education research journals. EMS Newsletter, 86, 52–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trouche, L., Drijvers, P., Gueudet, G., & Sacristán, A. I. (2013). Technology-driven developments and policy implications for mathematics education. In M. A. (Ken) Clements, A. J. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 753–789). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-4684-2_24.

  • Tu, C.-H., Sujo-Montes, L., Yen, C.-J., Chan, J.-Y., & Blocher, M. (2012). The integration of personal learning environments & open network learning environments. TechTrends, 56(3), 13–19. doi:10.1007/s11528-012-0571-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Sande, C. (2011). A description and characterization of student activity in an open, online, mathematics help forum. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77(1), 53–78. doi:10.1007/s10649-011-9300-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villarreal, M. E., & Borba, M. C. (2010). Collectives of humans-with-media in mathematics education: notebooks, blackboards, calculators, computers and… notebooks throughout 100 years of ICMI. ZDM–The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 42(1), 49–62. doi:10.1007/s11858-009-0207-3.

  • Wagner, J. A. (1995). Studies of individualism-collectivism: effects on cooperation in groups. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 152–172. doi:10.2307/256731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, T., & Martin, L. (2014). Mathematics and mobile learning. TechTrends, 58(1), 64–70. doi:10.1007/s11528-013-0722-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijers, M., Jonker, V., & Drijvers, P. (2010). MobileMath: exploring mathematics outside the classroom. ZDM–The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 42(7), 789–799. doi:10.1007/s11858-010-0276-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wild, F., Kalz, M., & Palmér, M. (Eds.). (2010). Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Mashup Personal Learning Environments. Barcelona, Spain. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-638/. Accessed 14 Feb 2014.

  • Wild, F., Moedritscher, F., & Sigurdarson, S. E. (2008). Designing for change: MASH-up personal learning environments. eLearning Papers 9.

  • Wilson, S. (2008). Patterns of personal learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 16(1), 17–34. doi:10.1080/10494820701772660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. G. (2013). The flipped class. A method to address the challenges of an undergraduate statistics course. Teaching of Psychology, 40(3), 193–199. doi:10.1177/0098628313487461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yerushalmy, M., & Botzer, G. (2011). Guiding mathematical inquiry in mobile settings. In O. Zaslavsky, & P. Sullivan (Eds.), Constructing knowledge for teaching secondary mathematics (pp. 191–207). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-09812-8_12.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate Program in Mathematics Education, UNESP, Rio Claro, Brazil

    Marcelo C. Borba

  2. Emeritus, Department of Computer Education and Instructional Technology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey

    Petek Askar

  3. Department of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

    Johann Engelbrecht

  4. Faculty of Education, Western University, London, ON, Canada

    George Gadanidis

  5. Departamento de Innovación y Formación Didáctica, Facultad de Educación, Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, Spain

    Salvador Llinares

  6. Programa de Matemática Educativa, CICATA Legaria, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Calzada Legaria No. 694, Col. Irrigacion, Del. Miguel Hidalgo, C.P. 11500, Mexico City, Mexico

    Mario Sánchez Aguilar

Authors
  1. Marcelo C. Borba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Petek Askar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Johann Engelbrecht
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. George Gadanidis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Salvador Llinares
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mario Sánchez Aguilar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Sánchez Aguilar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Borba, M.C., Askar, P., Engelbrecht, J. et al. Blended learning, e-learning and mobile learning in mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Education 48, 589–610 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0798-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0798-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation