Abstract
This paper presents theoretical notions developed in a design research study for investigating the development of students’ conceptions within a learning environment for grade 6. The study was designed to give opportunities to learn about random data showing patterns in the long run while being haphazard in the short term. By an in-depth analysis, we have investigated the microprocesses of constructing meanings of short-term and long-term behaviour and of attempting to relate them to each other. We have identified different patterns of microprocesses such as negotiating the scope of applicability in terms of situational or stochastic contexts. These patterns can—as empirically grounded theoretical notions—refine the conceptual change approach by providing tools for describing students’ learning trajectories and potential obstacles in stochastics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrahamson, D., & Wilensky, U. (2007). Learning axes and bridging tools in a technology-based design for statistics. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 12, 23–55.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, S. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.
Confrey, J. (1990). A review of the research on student conceptions in mathematics, science and programming. Review of Research in Education, 16(1), 3–56.
diSessa, A. (1993). Towards an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2–3), 105–225.
Dreyfus, T., & Tsamir, P. (2004). Ben’s consolidation of knowledge structures about infinite sets. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23, 271–300.
Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: a powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671–688.
Fischbein, E. (1975). The intuitive sources of probabilistic thinking in children. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Gravemeijer, K., & Cobb, P. (2006). Design research from the learning design perspective. In J. van den Akker, et al. (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 45–85). London: Routledge.
Gropengießer, H. (2001). Didaktische Rekonstruktion des Sehens. Wissenschaftliche Theorien und die Sicht der Schüler in der Perspektive der Vermittlung. Oldenburg: DIZ.
Hußmann, S., Leuders, T., Prediger, S., & Barzel, B. (2011). Kontexte für sinnstiftendes Mathematiklernen (KOSIMA)—ein fachdidaktisches Forschungs- und Entwicklungsprojekt. Beiträge zum Mathematikunterricht, 419–422.
Hußmann, S., & Prediger, S. (2009). Je größer die Wurfanzahl, desto sicherer die Wette—Mit dem Spiel Wettkönig den Zufall auf lange Sicht erkunden. Praxis der Mathematik in der Schule, 51(25), 24–29.
Johnston-Wilder, P., & Pratt, D. (2007). The relationship between local and global perspectives on randomness. In D. Pitta-Pantazi & G. Philippou (Eds.), European research in mathematics education: Proceedings of the Fifth Congress of the European Society for Research in mathematics education (pp. 742–751). Larnaca: Department of Education, University of Cyprus.
Konold, C. (1989). Informal conceptions of probability. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 59–98.
Moore, D. S. (1990). Uncertainty. In L. Steen (Ed.), On the shoulders of giants: New approaches to numeracy (pp. 95–137). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Posner, G., Strike, K., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.
Pratt, D., & Noss, R. (2002). The micro-evolution of mathematical knowledge: The case of randomness. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(4), 453–488.
Prediger, S. (2008). Do you want me to do it with probability or with my normal thinking? Horizontal and vertical views on the formation of stochastic conceptions. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(3), 126–154.
Prediger, S., & Hußmann, S. (2012). Spielen—Wetten—Voraussagen. Den Zufall im Griff? In S. Prediger, B. Barzel, S. Hußmann & T. Leuders (Eds.), Mathewerkstatt 6. Berlin: Cornelsen. (Textbook for German middle schools) (in press).
Prediger, S., & Rolka, K. (2009). Using betting games for initiating conceptual change. Asian Journal of Educational Research and Synergy, 1(1), 61–71.
Prediger, S., & Schnell, S. (2011). Individual pathways in the development of students’ conceptions of patterns of chance. In M. Pytlak, T. Rowland & E. Swoboda (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh Congress of the European Society for Research in mathematics education (pp. 885–895). Rzeszow: University of Rzeszow.
Riemer, W. (1991). Stochastische Probleme aus elementarer Sicht. Mannheim: BI Wissenschaftsverlag.
Ron, G., Dreyfus, T., & Hershkowitz, R. (2010). Partially correct constructs illuminate students’ inconsistent answers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(1), 65–87.
Schnell, S. (2013). Entwicklung von individuellen Vorstellungen zum Phänomen Zufall (working title). PhD Thesis. TU Dortmund University (Supervisor S. Prediger) (in preparation).
Schwarz, B., Dreyfus, T., & Hershkowitz, R. (2009). The nested epistemic actions model for abstraction in context. In B. Schwarz, T. Dreyfus, & R. Hershkowitz (Eds.), Transformation of knowledge through classroom interaction (pp. 11–41). London, New York: Routledge.
Sedlmeier, P., & Gigerenzer, G. (1997). Intuitions about sample size: The Empirical Law of large numbers. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10(1), 33–51.
Shaughnessy, J. M. (1992). Research in probability and statistics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 465–494). New York: MacMillan.
Tyson, L. M., Venville, G. J., Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (1997). A multi-dimensional framework for interpreting conceptual change in the classroom. Science Education, 81(4), 387–404.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schnell, S., Prediger, S. From “everything changes” to “for high numbers, it changes just a bit”. ZDM Mathematics Education 44, 825–840 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0434-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0434-x