Skip to main content
Log in

Explaining costumer reactions to real stockouts

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Review of Managerial Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The occurrence of stockouts remains an unsolved problem for retailers that provoke severe revenue and image losses, as well as greater customer dissatisfaction for both retailers and manufacturers. A literature review suggests a model of influential antecedents of consumers’ reactions to product unavailability. A field study then provides insights into true stockout situations, unlike a hypothetical research setting. With these data, this study reveals that loyalty and the presence of product alternatives have the greatest impacts on customer reactions. This result has significant theoretical and managerial implications due to the fact that results based on hypothetical settings did not hold.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldrich JH, Nelson FD (1984) Linear, probability, logit and probit models. Sage, Beverly Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • Babin BJ, Darden WR, Griffin M (1994) Work and/or fun: measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. J Consum Res 20(March):644–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi RP, Yi Y (2012) Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. J Acad Mark Sci 40(1):8–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batra R, Ahtola OT (1991) Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes. Mark Lett 2(April):159–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner H, Steenkamp J-BEM (1996) Exploratory consumer buying behavior: conceptualization and measurement. Int J Res Mark 13(April):121–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belk RW (1975) Situational variables and consumer behavior. J Consum Res 2(December):157–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campo K, Gijsbrechts E, Nisol P (2000) Towards understanding consumer response to stock-outs. J Retail 76(Summer):219–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chernev A (2003) When more is less and less is more: the role of ideal point availability and assortment in consumer choice. J Consum Res 30(September):170–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer JS (1991) The logit model: an introduction for economists. Edward Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhar R (1997) Consumer preference for a no-choice option. J Consum Res 24(September):215–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmelhainz MA, Stock JR, Emmelhainz LW (1991) Consumer response to retail stock-outs. J Retail 67(Summer):138–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimons GJ (2000) Consumer response to stockouts. J Consum Res 27(September):249–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruen TW, Corsten DS, Bharadwaj S (2002) Retail out of stocks: a worldwide examination of extent, causes, and consumer responses. Grocery Manufactures of America, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardgrave BC, Waller M, Miller R (2005) Does RFID reduce out of stocks? A preliminary analysis. Information Technology Institute, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm R, Landschulze S (2011) How does consumer age affect the desire for new products and brands? A multi-group causal analysis. Review of Managerial Science (forthcoming)

  • Helm R, Stoelzle W (2007) Out-of-stocks within retail shops: influential factors and customer reaction patterns. Yearb Mark Consum Res 5:64–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess JD, Gerstner E (1998) Yes, ‘‘bait and switch’’ really benefits customers. Mark Sci 17(3):283–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn BE, Lehmann DR (1991) Modeling choice among assortments. J Retail 67(Fall):274–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly JP, Smith SM, Hunt HK (2000) Fulfillment of planned and unplanned purchases of sale- and regular-price items: a benchmark study. Int Rev Retail Distrib Consum Res 10(July):247–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim M (2004) Consumer response to stockouts in online apparel shopping. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Ohio State University, Columbus

  • Kromrey H (2006) Empirische Sozialforschung. Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuba C (1955) Toward some integration of learning theories: the concept of optimal stimulation. Psychol Rep 1:27–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra NK (1984) Information and sensory overload. Psychol Mark 1((Fall/Winter)):9–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAlister L, Pessemier E (1982) Variety-seeking behavior: an interdisciplinary review. J Consum Res 9(December):311–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal B (1989) Measuring purchase-decision-involvement. Psychol Mark 6(Summer):147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal B, Lee M-S (1989) A causal model of consumer involvement. J Econ Psychol 10(November):363–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppewal H, Koelemeijer K (2005) More choice is better: effects of assortment size and composition on assortment evaluation. Int J Res Mark 22(March):45–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papakiriakopoulos D (2006) Performance measurement in supply chain networks: the case of fast moving consumer goods. In: Klein S, Poulymenakou A (eds) Managing dynamic networks: organizational perspectives of technology enabled inter-firm collaboration. Springer, Berlin, pp 211–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckham JO (1963) The consumer speaks. J Mark 27(October):21–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson RobertA (1994) A meta-analysis of Cronbach’s coefficient alpha. J Consum Res 21(September):381–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raju PS (1980) Optimum stimulation level: its relationship to personality, demographics, and exploratory behavior. J Consum Res 7(December):272–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rust RT, Lehmann DR, Farley JU (1990) Estimating publication bias in meta-analysis. J Mark Res 27(2):220–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schary PB, Martin C (1979) The anatomy of a stock-out. J Retail 55(Summer):59–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider KC, Rodgers WC (1996) An ‘‘importance’’ subscale for the consumer involvement profile. Adv Consum Res 23(1):249–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonson I (1999) The effect of product assortment on buyer preferences. J Retail 75(Autumn):347–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloot LM, Verhoef PC, Franses PH (2002) The impact of brand and category characteristics on consumer stock-out reactions. Working Paper, Food Management Institute, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloot LM, Verhoef PC, Franses PH (2005) The impact of brand equity and the hedonic level of products on consumer stock-out reactions. J Retail 81(1):15–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sproles GB, Kendall EL (1986) A methodology for profiling consumers’ decision-making styles. J Consum Aff 20(December):267–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp J-BEM, Baumgartner H (1992) The role of optimum stimulation level in exploratory consumer behavior. J Consum Res 19(December):434–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp J-BEM, van Trijp HCM (1991) The use of LISREL in validating marketing constructs. Int J Res Mark 8(November):283–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sujan Mita, Bettman James (1989) The effects of brand positioning strategies on consumers’ brand and category perceptions: some insights from schema research. J Mark Res 26(November):454–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Woensel T, van Donselaar K, Broekmeulen R, Fransoo J (2007) Consumer responses to shelf out-of-stocks of perishable products. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 37(9):704–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke W, Farris P, Thurik R (1998) Consumer response to the preferred brand out-of-stock situation. Eur J Mark 32(11/12):1008–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter CK, Grabner JR (1975) Stockout cost models: empirical tests in a retail situation. J Mark 39(July):56–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaichkowsky JL (1986) Conceptualizing involvement. J Advert 15(2):4–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zinn W, Liu PC (2001) Consumer response to retail stockouts. J Bus Logist 22(1):49–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zinszer PH, Lesser JA (1981) An empirical evaluation of the role to stock-out on shopping patronage processes. Adv Consum Res 8(1):221–224

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Wolfgang Stoelzle, Chair of Logistic Management at the University of St. Gallen, for the excellent cooperation on this project as well as Melitta Haushaltsprodukte GmbH, Migros-Genossenschafts-Bund, Real,- SB-Warenhaus GmbH, SCA Hygiene Products AG and Woolworth GmbH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roland Helm.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 7.

Table 7 Correlations between the antecedents

Appendix 2

See Table 8.

Table 8 Explanatory variables and item formulations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Helm, R., Hegenbart, T. & Endres, H. Explaining costumer reactions to real stockouts. Rev Manag Sci 7, 223–246 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-012-0079-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-012-0079-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation