Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Résultats factuels pour le traitement du prolapsus rectal: est-ce possible, comment avancer ?

  • Dossier Thématique / Thematic File
  • Published:
Côlon & Rectum

Résumé

La prise en charge opératoire du prolapsus rectal ne permet pas actuellement de définir des standards, tant par un manque d’uniformité de la technique que par une évaluation des patients imparfaite et peu objective. Une meilleure compréhension des mécanismes qui provoquent le prolapsus pourrait également aider à mieux poser les indications

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Références

  1. Tou SBS, Malik AI, Nelson RL (2009) Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (Issue 4)

  2. Xynos E, Chrysos E, Tsiaoussis J, et al (1999) Resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse. The laparoscopic approach. Surg Endosc 13:862–864

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kellokumpu IH, Vironen J, Scheinin T (2000) Laparoscopic repair of rectal prolapse: a prospective study evaluating surgical outcome and changes in symptoms and bowel function. Surg Endosc 14:634–640

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Benoist S, Taffinder N, Gould S, et al (2001) Functional results two years after laparoscopic rectopexy. Am J Surg. 182:168–173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilson J, Engledow A, Crosbie J, et al (2010) Laparoscopic nonresectional suture rectopexy in the management of full-thickness rectal prolapse: substantive retrospective series. Surg Endosc (in press)

  6. Bruyere F, Rozenberg H, Abdelkader T (2001) Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy: an attractive approach for prolapse repair. Prog Urol 11:1320–1326

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rivoire C, Botchorishvili R, Canis M, et al (2007) Complete laparoscopic treatment of genital prolapse with meshes including vaginal promontofixation and anterior repair: a series of 138 patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14:712–718

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wagner L, Boileau L, Delmas V, et al (2009) Surgical treatment of prolapse using coelioscopic promontofixation: techniques and results. Prog Urol 19:994–1005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Altomare DF, Spazzafumo L, Rinaldi M, et al (2008) Set-up and statistical validation of a new scoring system for obstructed defaecation syndrome. Colorectal Dis 10:84–88

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, et al (1996) A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 39:681–685

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Knowles CH, Eccersley AJ, Scott SM, et al (2000) Linear discriminant analysis of symptoms in patients with chronic constipation: validation of a new scoring system (KESS). Dis Colon Rectum 43:1419–1426

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pescatori M, Anastasio G, Bottini C, Mentasti A (1992) New grading and scoring for anal incontinence. Evaluation of 335 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 35:482–487

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA (1999) Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut 44(1):77–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Eypasch E, Williams JI, Wood-Dauphinee S, et al (1995) Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg 82:216–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Slim K, Bousquet J, Kwiatkowski F, et al (1999) First validation of the French version of the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI). Gastroenterol Clin Biol 23:25–31

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. de Tayrac R, Deval B, Fernandez H, Mares P (2007) Development of a linguistically validated French version of two short-form, condition-specific quality of life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 36:738–748

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Clinique de chirurgie digestive et endocrine, institut des maladies de l’appareil digestif, CHU de Nantes Hôtel-Dieu, F-44000, Nantes, France

    E. Abet & G. Meurette

Authors
  1. E. Abet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. Meurette
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Abet.

About this article

Cite this article

Abet, E., Meurette, G. Résultats factuels pour le traitement du prolapsus rectal: est-ce possible, comment avancer ?. Colon Rectum 5, 29–31 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11725-011-0281-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11725-011-0281-x

Search

Navigation