Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predictors for Remission of Major Components of the Metabolic Syndrome After Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch (BPDDS)

  • Clinical Research
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Metabolic surgery causes the remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), hypertension, and hyperlipidemia to varying degrees, depending on the patient characteristics and the surgical procedure. The aim of this study was to find predictors for the remission of T2DM and hypertension after biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPDDS).

Methods

Eighty patients with T2DM were followed up for 2 years or more after BPDDS, and changes in body weight and metabolic status were noted. Remission was defined as fasting glucose <7 mmol/l with HbA1C <6.5 %, blood pressure <140/90 mmHg, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) <2.6 mmol without the use of medication.

Results

Preoperatively, the mean age was 44 years, body mass index (BMI) was 48 kg/m2, and duration of diabetes was 5 years. Of the 80 patients, 38 patients were using insulin, 48 patients were using antihypertensives, and 38 patients were using a lipid-lowering drug. Five percent of the patients had recommended levels for HbA1C, blood pressure, and LDL prior to the operation. The remission rate at 2 years was 94 % for T2DM, 54 % for hypertension, and 86 % for LDL hyperlipidemia. Preoperative predictors for nonremission of T2DM were a higher BMI, insulin usage, and low insulin C-peptide, and for hypertension, older age and more severe hypertension. Postoperative weight loss was important for both.

Conclusions

Surgical intervention with BPDDS is an effective treatment of T2DM, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. The duration of T2DM and age of the patient are the most important preoperative predictors for the remission of T2DM and hypertension, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabet Med. 1998;15(7):539–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hu G, et al. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome and its relation to all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in nondiabetic European men and women. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(10):1066–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Solli O, Jenssen T, Kristiansen IS. Diabetes: cost of illness in Norway. BMC Endocr Disord. 2010;10:15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2011. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(Suppl 1):S11–61.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Saydah SH, Fradkin J, Cowie CC. Poor control of risk factors for vascular disease among adults with previously diagnosed diabetes. JAMA. 2004;291(3):335–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Branca F, Nikogosian H, Lobstein T, editors. The challenge of obesity in the WHO European Region and the strategies for response. WHO regional office, Copenhagen: WHO; 2007. 324 pp.

  7. Buchwald H, et al. Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2009;122(3):248.e5–56.e5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dixon JB, et al. Bariatric surgery: an IDF statement for obese type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2011;28(6):628–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chikunguwo SM, et al. Analysis of factors associated with durable remission of diabetes after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6(3):254–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pories WJ, et al. Surgical treatment of obesity and its effect on diabetes: 10-y follow-up. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992;55(2 Suppl):582S–5S.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schauer PR, et al. Effect of laparoscopic Roux-en Y gastric bypass on type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann Surg. 2003;238(4):467–84. discussion 84–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Crea N, et al. Long-term results of biliopancreatic diversion with or without gastric preservation for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2011;21(2):139–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gracia-Solanas JA, et al. Metabolic syndrome after bariatric surgery. Results depending on the technique performed. Obes Surg. 2011;21(2):179–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Prachand VN, Ward M, Alverdy JC. Duodenal switch provides superior resolution of metabolic comorbidities independent of weight loss in the super-obese (BMI > or = 50 kg/m2) compared with gastric bypass. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14(2):211–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Deitel M. Update: why diabetes does not resolve in some patients after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2011;21(6):794–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Buse JB, et al. How do we define cure of diabetes? Diabetes Care. 2009;32(11):2133–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stakkestad JA, Åsberg A. Brukerhåndbok i klinisk kjemi. Haugesund: Akademisk fagforlag AS; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Scopinaro N, et al. Specific effects of biliopancreatic diversion on the major components of metabolic syndrome: a long-term follow-up study. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(10):2406–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Drapeau V, et al. Waist circumference is useless to assess the prevalence of metabolic abnormalities in severely obese women. Obes Surg. 2007;17(7):905–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vage V, Gåsdal R, Laukeland C, et al. The biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch (BPDDS): how is it optimally performed? Obes Surg. 2011;21(12):1864–9.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Deitel M, Gawdat K, Melissas J. Reporting weight loss 2007. Obes Surg. 2007;17(5):565–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Angervall L, Dotevall G, Tillander H. Amelioration of diabetes mellitus following gastric resection. Acta Med Scand. 1961;169:743–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee HC, et al. Early changes in incretin secretion after laparoscopic duodenal–jejunal bypass surgery in type 2 diabetic patients. Obes Surg. 2010;20(11):1530–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Patriti A, et al. How the hindgut can cure type 2 diabetes. Ileal transposition improves glucose metabolism and beta-cell function in Goto-kakizaki rats through an enhanced proglucagon gene expression and L-cell number. Surgery. 2007;142(1):74–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Adami GF, et al. Recovery of insulin sensitivity in obese patients at short term after biliopancreatic diversion. J Surg Res. 2003;113(2):217–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ahmed AR, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and its early effect on blood pressure. Obes Surg. 2009;19(7):845–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Czupryniak L, et al. Circadian blood pressure variation in morbidly obese hypertensive patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery. Am J Hypertens. 2005;18(4 Pt 1):446–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bueter M, et al. Bariatric surgery and hypertension. Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatric Surg. 2009;5(5):615–20.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sjostrom L, et al. Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(26):2683–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Vage V, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors in obese patients treated with jejunoileal bypass operation: a 25-year follow-up study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005;40(1):90–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Naslund E, et al. Importance of small bowel peptides for the improved glucose metabolism 20 years after jejunoileal bypass for obesity. Obes Surg. 1998;8(3):253–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Scopinaro N, et al. A comparison of a personal series of biliopancreatic diversion and literature data on gastric bypass help to explain the mechanisms of resolution of type 2 diabetes by the two operations. Obes Surg. 2008;18(8):1035–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hess DS, Hess DW, Oakley RS. The biliopancreatic diversion with the duodenal switch: results beyond 10 years. Obes Surg. 2005;15(3):408–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Marceau P, et al. Duodenal switch: long-term results. Obes Surg. 2007;17(11):1421–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Iaconelli A, et al. Effects of bilio-pancreatic diversion on diabetic complications: a 10-year follow-up. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(3):561–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Casella G, Abbatini F, Cali B, et al. Ten-year duration of type 2 diabetes as prognostic factor for remission after sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7(6):697–702.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sarkhosh K, Birch DW, Shi X et al. The impact of sleeve gastrectomy on hypertension: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2012;22(5):832–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The first author had travel expenses for one international conference in 2010 covered by Covidien Norway through an educational grant given to the Surgical Department, Unit for Bariatric Surgery, Førde Central Hospital. Roy M. Nilsen, Arnold Berstad, Jan Behme, Nils Sletteskog, Ronny Gåsdal, Camilla Laukeland, and Gunnar Mellgren do not have any commercial associations that might be a conflict of interest in relation to this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Villy Våge.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Våge, V., Nilsen, R.M., Berstad, A. et al. Predictors for Remission of Major Components of the Metabolic Syndrome After Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch (BPDDS). OBES SURG 23, 80–86 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-012-0775-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-012-0775-0

Keywords

Navigation