Skip to main content
Log in

Fern diversity and biomass at Chilapatta reserve forest of West Bengal Terai Duars in sub-humid tropical foothills of Indian eastern Himalayas

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Forestry Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We documented the status of fern diversity, biomass and carbon accumulation at Chilapatta Reserve Forest in Cooch Behar Wildlife Division, West Bengal. Stratified random nested quadrat sampling was adopted for analyzing the qualitative and quantitative characters. Nineteen fern species were recorded, of which two are yet to be identified. Identified species were of eight families and nine genera. Highest and lowest frequency recorded were 25.44 and 0.19 while relative frequency varied from 3.16 to 12.25. Fern density ranged from 93 to 13,403 individuals ·ha−1. Most of the species were widely distributed. IVI values ranged from 7.54 to 37.45. The above ground portion of ferns accumulated the major portion of biomass and carbon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous. 2001. 4th Working Plan for the Forests of Cooch Behar district and Jalpaiguri district (Part). Comprising Cooch Behar Forest Division and Cooch Behar S. F. Division Volume — I, 2000-01 to 2009-10. Darjeeling: Divisional Forest Officer, Working Plans (North) Division, p. 87.

  • Caius JF. 1935. Medicinal and poisonous Ferns of India. Bombay Natural History Society, 83: 341–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champion HG, Seth SK. 1968. A Revised Survey of the Forest Types of India. New Delhi: Manager of Publications, p. 404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra S. 2000. The Ferns of India (Enumeration, Synonyms and Distributions). Dehradun, India: International Book Distributors, p. 459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman AD. 2009. Numbers of Living Species in Australia and the World. Report for the Australian Biological Resources Study. Canberra, Australia. September. 〈http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/abrs/publications/other/species-numbers/index.html〉.

  • Cottam G, Curtis JT. 1956. The use of distance measures in phytosociological sampling. Ecology, 37: 451–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das NC. 2007. Ferns and Fern Allies of Tripura: North East India. Dehradun, India: International Book Distributors, p. 198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dash PK, Mohapatra PP, Rao YG. 2009. Diversity and distribution pattern of tree species in Niyamgiri hill ranges, Orissa, India. Indian Forester, 135: 927–942.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit RD. 1984. A Census of the Indian Pteridophytes, Flora of India, Ser. 4. Howrah (Calcutta) India: Botanical Survey of India, pp. 1–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta Choudhury M, Bhattarcharya MK. 1996. Dipteris wallichi-a new report from Hailakandi district, Assam. Indian Fern Journal, 13: 18–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans GC. 1972. The quantitative analysis of plant growth. London: Blackwell, p. 734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fajardo A, Alaback P. 2005. Effects of natural and human disturbances on the dynamics and spatial structure of Nathofagus glauca in south-central Chile. Journal of Biogeography, 32: 1811–1825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galav PK, Katewa SS, Chaudhary BL, Jain A. 2005. Phytosociological studies on the grassland community of southern Aravalli hills of Rajasthan. Indian Forester, 131: 493–952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaushik P, Dhiman AK. 1995. Common Medicinal Pteridophytes. Indian Fern Journal, 12: 139–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menhinick EF. 1964. A comparison of some species diversity indices applied to samples of field insects. Ecology, 45: 858–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra R. 1968. Ecology Work Book. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., p. 197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niinemets U, Portsumuth A, Tobias M. 2007. Leaf shape and venation pattern alter the support investments within leaf lamia in temperate species: a neglected sources of leaf physiological differentiation. Functional Ecology, 21: 28–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul SC. 2004. Land use effects on soil characteristics of Terai region of West Bengal (M. Sc. Thesis). West Bengal, India: Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickup M, Westoby M, Basden A. 2005. Dry mass coasts of developing leaf area in relation to leaf size. Functional Ecology, 19: 88–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pielou EC. 1975. Ecological diversity. New York: John Wiley and Sons, p. 165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raunkiaer C. 1934. The Life Forms of Plants and Statistical Plant Geography. U. K.: Oxford University Press, p. 632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts NR, Dalton PJ, Jordan GJ. 2005. Epiphytic ferns and bryophytes of Tasmanian tree-ferns: A comparison of diversity and composition between two host species. Austral Ecology, 30: 146–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagwal SS. 1995. Forest Ecology of India. Jaipur: Pointer Publishers, pp. 87–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CE, Weaver 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, USA: University of Illinois Press, p. 117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CE, Weiner W. 1963. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, Illinois, USA: University of Illinois Press, p. 111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shil S, Choudhury DM. 2009. Ethnomedicinal Importance of Pteridophytes Used by Reang tribe of Tripura, North East India. Ethnobotanical Leaflets, 13: 634–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson EM. 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163: 688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava RK, Khanduri VP, Sharma CM, Kumar P. 2005. Structure, diversity and regeneration potential of Oak dominant conifer mixed forest along in altitudinal gradient in Garhwal Himalaya. Indian Forester, 131: 1537–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swamy SL, Puri S, Singh AK. 2003. Growth, biomass, carbon storage and nutrient distribution in Gmelina arborea Roxb. stands on red lateritic soils in central India. Bioresource Technology, 90: 109–126.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Westoby M, Falster DS, Moles AT, Vesk PA, Wright IJ. 2002. Plant ecology strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annual Review Ecology System, 33: 125–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore TC. 1998. An Introduction to Tropical Forests. 2nd edition. Urbana Clarendon: Oxford and University Illinois Press, p. 117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woomer PL. 1999. Impact of cultivation of carbon fluxes in woody savannas of Southern Africa. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 70: 403–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sumit Chakravarty.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shukla, G., Chakravarty, S. Fern diversity and biomass at Chilapatta reserve forest of West Bengal Terai Duars in sub-humid tropical foothills of Indian eastern Himalayas. Journal of Forestry Research 23, 609–613 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-012-0301-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-012-0301-1

Keywords

Navigation