Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy on Anastomotic Leak After Restorative Resection for Rectal Cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Purpose

This study was undertaken to determine whether neoadjuvant radiotherapy is associated with an increased risk of anastomotic leak for rectal cancer patients undergoing restorative resection.

Methods

From 1980 to 2010, patients who underwent restorative resection for rectal cancer (tumors within 15 cm of anal verge) were identified from a prospective institutional database and grouped based on whether they received neoadjuvant radiotherapy (+RT) or not (−RT). The main outcome was anastomotic leak documented by imaging (contrast leak), intra-operative or clinical (signs of peritonitis) findings and confirmed by staff surgeon assessment. Using multivariate (MV) analysis risk factors for leak were identified, presented as OR (95 % CI).

Results

One thousand eight hundred sixty-two patients were included in the analysis, 28 % in the +RT group. Eighty-six percent of +RT patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The overall leak rate was 6.3 %, with no significant difference in +RT and −RT groups (8 % vs 5.7 %, p = 0.06). The +RT group had a lower mean age at surgery (58 vs 63 year, p < 0.001), more male (75 % vs 62 %, p < 0.001) and more ASA 3/4 (44 % vs 35 %, p < 0.001) patients, greater use of defunctioning ostomy (87 % vs 44 %, p < 0.001) and colo-anal anastomosis (77 % vs 34 %, p < 0.001). Mean tumor distance from the anal verge was lower in +RT group (6.6 vs 9.7 cm, p < 0.001). On MV analysis, male sex (OR 1.64 (1.03–2.62), p = 0.038), ASA 4 (OR 4.70 (2.07–10.7), p < 0.001), tumor distance from anal verge ≤ 5 cm (OR 2.49 (1.37–4.52), p = 0.003), and tumor size at surgery ≥ 4 cm (OR 1.75 (1.15–2.65), p = 0.009) were independently associated with leak. +RT was not independently associated with leak (OR 1.44 (0.85–2.46), p = 0.18), while defunctioning ostomy did not reduce leak occurrence (OR 0.75 (0.44–1.28), p = 0.29).

Conclusions

The findings suggest that neoadjuvant radiotherapy is not independently associated with an anastomotic leak for rectal cancer patients undergoing restorative resection and support a selective policy towards the use of a defunctioning ostomy on a case by case basis based on intra-operative judgment and consideration of tumor location, size, and patient characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, Rodel C, Wittekind C, Fietkau R, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2004 Oct 21;351(17):1731–1740.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Roh MS, Colangelo LH, O’Connell MJ, Yothers G, Deutsch M, Allegra CJ, et al. Preoperative multimodality therapy improves disease-free survival in patients with carcinoma of the rectum: NSABP R-03. J Clin Oncol 2009 Nov 1;27(31):5124–5130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bosset JF, Collette L, Calais G, Mineur L, Maingon P, Radosevic-Jelic L, et al. Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2006 Sep 14;355(11):1114–1123.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. MacFarlane JK, Ryall RD, Heald RJ. Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1993 Feb 20;341(8843):457–460.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fielding LP, Stewart-Brown S, Blesovsky L, Kearney G. Anastomotic integrity after operations for large-bowel cancer: a multicentre study. Br Med J 1980 Aug 9;281(6237):411–414.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fujita S, Teramoto T, Watanabe M, Kodaira S, Kitajima M. Anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery: a risk factor for recurrence and poor prognosis. Jpn J Clin Oncol 1993 Oct;23(5):299–302.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McArdle CS, Hole D. Impact of variability among surgeons on postoperative morbidity and mortality and ultimate survival. BMJ 1991 Jun 22;302(6791):1501–1505.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rullier E, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Michel P, Saric J, Parneix M. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1998 Mar;85(3):355–358.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bedirli A, Kerem M, Karahacioglu E, Ofluoglu E, Yilmaz TU, Pasaoglu H, et al. Effects of two conventional preoperative radiation schedules on anastomotic healing in the rat colon. Eur Surg Res 2007;39(3):141–147.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuzu MA, Kuzu I, Koksoy C, Akyol FH, Uzal D, Kale IT, et al. Histological evaluation of colonic anastomotic healing in the rat following preoperative 5-fluorouracil, fractionated irradiation, and combined treatment. Int J Colorectal Dis 1998;13(5–6):235–240.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Milsom JW, Senagore A, Walshaw RK, Mostosky UV, Wang P, Johnson W, et al. Preoperative radiation therapy produces an early and persistent reduction in colorectal anastomotic blood flow. J Surg Res 1992 Nov;53(5):464–469.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Law WI, Chu KW, Ho JW, Chan CW. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. Am J Surg 2000 Feb;179(2):92–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Karanjia ND, Corder AP, Bearn P, Heald RJ. Leakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 1994 Aug;81(8):1224–1226.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vignali A, Fazio VW, Lavery IC, Milsom JW, Church JM, Hull TL, et al. Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients. J Am Coll Surg 1997 Aug;185(2):105–113.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U, Geibetaler S, Dralle H, Saeger HD, et al. Value of a protective stoma in low anterior resections for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2002 Sep;45(9):1164–1171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Karanjia ND, Corder AP, Holdsworth PJ, Heald RJ. Risk of peritonitis and fatal septicaemia and the need to defunction the low anastomosis. Br J Surg 1991 Feb;78(2):196–198.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Huser N, Michalski CW, Erkan M, Schuster T, Rosenberg R, Kleeff J, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 2008 Jul;248(1):52–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Baraza W, Wild J, Barber W, Brown S. Postoperative management after loop ileostomy closure: are we keeping patients in hospital too long? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2010 Jan;92(1):51–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chude GG, Rayate NV, Patris V, Koshariya M, Jagad R, Kawamoto J, et al. Defunctioning loop ileostomy with low anterior resection for distal rectal cancer: should we make an ileostomy as a routine procedure? A prospective randomized study. Hepatogastroenterology 2008 Sep-Oct;55(86–87):1562–1567.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Giannakopoulos GF, Veenhof AA, van der Peet DL, Sietses C, Meijerink WJ, Cuesta MA. Morbidity and complications of protective loop ileostomy. Colorectal Dis 2009 Jul;11(6):609–612.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. van de Pavoordt HD, Fazio VW, Jagelman DG, Lavery IC, Weakley FL. The outcome of loop ileostomy closure in 293 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 1987 Nov;2(4):214–217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Williams LA, Sagar PM, Finan PJ, Burke D. The outcome of loop ileostomy closure: a prospective study. Colorectal Dis 2008 Jun;10(5):460–464.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pakkastie TE, Luukkonen PE, Jarvinen HJ. Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. Eur J Surg 1994 May;160(5):293–7; discussion 299–300.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. da Luz Moreira A, Mor I, Geisler DP, Remzi FH, Kiran RP. Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: a case-matched study. Surg Endosc 2010 Jun 29.

  25. Khaikin M, Bashankaev B, Person B, Cera S, Sands D, Weiss E, et al. Laparoscopic versus open proctectomy for rectal cancer: patients’ outcome and oncologic adequacy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2009 Apr;19(2):118–122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Enker WE, Merchant N, Cohen AM, Lanouette NM, Swallow C, Guillem J, et al. Safety and efficacy of low anterior resection for rectal cancer: 681 consecutive cases from a specialty service. Ann Surg 1999 Oct;230(4):544–52; discussion 552–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lyall A, Mc Adam TK, Townend J, Loudon MA. Factors affecting anastomotic complications following anterior resection in rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2007 Nov;9(9):801–807.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Eriksen MT, Wibe A, Norstein J, Haffner J, Wiig JN, Norwegian Rectal Cancer Group. Anastomotic leakage following routine mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in a national cohort of patients. Colorectal Dis 2005 Jan;7(1):51–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Matthiessen P, Hallbook O, Rutegard J, Simert G, Sjodahl R. Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 2007 Aug;246(2):207–214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gastinger I, Marusch F, Steinert R, Wolff S, Koeckerling F, Lippert H, et al. Protective defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 2005 Sep;92(9):1137–1142.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wong KS, Remzi FH, Gorgun E, Arrigain S, Church JM, Preen M, et al. Loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy: outcome in 1,504 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2005 Feb;48(2):243–250.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bakx R, Busch OR, Bemelman WA, Veldink GJ, Slors JF, van Lanschot JJ. Morbidity of temporary loop ileostomies. Dig Surg 2004;21(4):277–281.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Phang PT, Hain JM, Perez-Ramirez JJ, Madoff RD, Gemlo BT. Techniques and complications of ileostomy takedown. Am J Surg 1999 Jun;177(6):463–466.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Garcia-Botello SA, Garcia-Armengol J, Garcia-Granero E, Espi A, Juan C, Lopez-Mozos F, et al. A prospective audit of the complications of loop ileostomy construction and takedown. Dig Surg 2004;21(5–6):440–446.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Saha AK, Tapping CR, Foley GT, Baker RP, Sagar PM, Burke DA, et al. Morbidity and mortality after closure of loop ileostomy. Colorectal Dis 2009 Oct;11(8):866–871.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Thalheimer A, Bueter M, Kortuem M, Thiede A, Meyer D. Morbidity of temporary loop ileostomy in patients with colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2006 Jul;49(7):1011–1017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ravi P. Kiran.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nisar, P.J., Lavery, I.C. & Kiran, R.P. Influence of Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy on Anastomotic Leak After Restorative Resection for Rectal Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 16, 1750–1757 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1936-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1936-0

Keywords

Navigation