Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Revising laboratory work: sociological perspectives on the science classroom

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cultural Studies of Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study uses sociological perspectives to analyse one of the core practices in science education: schoolchildren’s and students’ laboratory work. Applying an ethnographic approach to the laboratory work done by pupils at a Swedish compulsory school, data were generated through observations, field notes, interviews, and a questionnaire. The pupils, ages 14 and 15, were observed as they took a 5-week physics unit (specifically, mechanics). The analysis shows that the episodes of laboratory work could be filled with curiosity and exciting challenges; however, another picture emerged when sociological concepts and notions were applied to what is a very common way of working in the classroom. Laboratory work is characterised as a social activity that is expected to be organised as a group activity. This entails groups becoming, to some extent, ‘safe havens’ for the pupils. On the other hand, this way of working in groups required pupils to subject to the groups and the peer effect, sometimes undermining their chances to learn and perform better. In addition, the practice of working in groups when doing laboratory work left some pupils and the teacher blaming themselves, even though the outcome of the learning situation was a result of a complex interplay of social processes. This article suggests a stronger emphasis on the contradictions and consequences of the science subjects, which are strongly influenced by their socio-historical legacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bäckman, M. (2003). Kön och känsla: samlevnadsundervisning och ungdomars tankar om sexualitet. (Doctoral dissertation, Stockholm University).

  • Beach, D. (2005). From fieldwork to theory and representation in ethnography. In G. Troman, B. Jeffrey, & G. Walford (Eds.), Methodological issues and practices in ethnography (pp. 1–17). Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/S1529-210X(05)11001-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, S., & Maton, K. (2010). Beyond the ‘digital natives’ debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students’ technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 321–331. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00360.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1975). Class, codes and control: Towards a theory of educational transmissions. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). In other words: Essays towards a reflexive sociology. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2010). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broady, D. (1985). Kultur och utbildning: om Pierre Bourdieus sociologi. Stockholm: Liber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broady, D., & Börjesson, M. (2008). En social karta över gymnasieskolan. In Ulf P. Lundgren (Ed.), Individ, samhälle, lärande: åtta exempel på utbildningsvetenskaplig forskning. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabrese Barton, A., & Yang, K. (2000). The culture of power and science education: Learning from Miguel. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 871–889. doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200010)37:8<871:AID-TEA7>3.0.CO;2-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlone, H. (2003). Innovative science within and against a culture of ‘achievement’. Science Education, 87(3), 307–328. doi:10.1002/sce.10071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlone, H. (2004). The cultural production of science in reform-based physics: Girls’ access, participation, and resistance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 392–414. doi:10.1002/tea.20006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlone, H., & Johnson, A. (2012). Unpacking ‘culture’ in cultural studies of science education: Cultural difference versus cultural production. Ethnography and Education, 7(2), 151–173. doi:10.1080/17457823.2012.693691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cederberg, M., Hartsmar, N., & Lingärde, S. (2009). Thematic report: Socioeconomic disadvantage. Report from the EPASI (Educational Policies that Address Social Inequality) project supported by the European Commission’s department of Education and Culture, SOCRATES programme 2.1.2. http://www.epasi.eu/ThematicReportSOC.pdf. Accessed February 24, 2012.

  • Clifford, J. (1986). Introduction: Partial truths. In James Clifford & George E. Marcus (Eds.), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography: A school of American research advanced seminar (pp. 1–26). Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehn, B., & Löfgren, O. (2010). The secret world of doing nothing. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esaiasson, P., Gilljam, M., Oscarsson, H., & Wängnerud, L. (2003). Metodpraktikan: konsten att studera samhälle, individ och marknad (2nd ed.). Stockholm: Norstedts juridik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorard, S., & See, B. H. (2009). The impact of socio-economic status on participation and attainment in science. Studies in Science, 45(1), 93–129. doi:10.1080/03057260802681821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goyette, K. A., & Mullen, A. L. (2006). Who studies the arts and sciences? Social background and the choice and consequences of undergraduate field of study. Journal of Higher Education, 77(3), 497–583. doi:10.1353/jhe.2006.0020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanrahan, M. (2006). Highlighting hybridity: A critical discourse analysis of teacher talk in science classrooms. Science Education, 90(1), 8–43. doi:10.1002/sce.20087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harker, R., Mahar, C., & Wilkes, C. (Eds.). (1990). An introduction to the work of Pierre Bourdieu: The practice of theory. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hultén, M. (2008). Naturens kanon: formering och förändring av innehållet i folkskolans och grundskolans naturvetenskap. (Doctoral Dissertation, Stockholm University).

  • Jobér, A. (2012). Social class in science class. (Doctoral Dissertation, Malmö University and Lund University).

  • Lederman, N. G. (1999). Teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: Factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(8), 916–929. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199910)36:8<916:AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (2008). Nature of science: Past, present and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–879). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundin, M., & Lindahl, M. G. (2014). Negotiating the relevance of laboratory work: Safety, procedures and accuracy brought to the fore in science education. Nordina, 10(1), 32–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mac Ruairc, G. (2011). The Pisa girls and ticking the boxes: An examination of students’ perspectives on Pisa testing. In M. A. Pereyra, H.-G. Kotthoff, & R. Cowen (Eds.), Pisa under examination: Changing knowledge, changing tests, and changing schools (pp. 143–156). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mehan, H. (2008). A sociological perspective on opportunity to learn and assessment. In P. Moss, D. C. Pullin, & J. P. Gee (Eds.), Assessment, equity, and opportunity to learn (pp. 42–75). Cambridge: CUP.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. (2008). Reproduction and transformation of inequalities in schooling: The transformative potential of the theoretical constructs of Bourdieu. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(1), 79–89. doi:10.1080/01425690701737481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munby, H., Cunningham, M., & Lock, C. (2000). School science culture: A case study of barriers to developing professional knowledge. Science Education, 84(2), 193–211. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200003)84:2<193:AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-K.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyström, E. (2009). Teacher talk: Producing, resisting and challenging discourses about the science classroom. Gender and Education, 21(6), 735–751. doi:10.1080/09540250903119146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2012). PISA 2012 Results in Focus. What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa–2012-results-overview.pdf. Accessed August 25, 2014.

  • Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. A report to the Nuffield Foundation. http://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/sites/default/files/Sci_Ed_in_Europe_Report_Final.pdf. Accessed August 25, 2014.

  • Parsons, E. C., & Carlone, H. (2013). Culture and science education in the twenty-first century: Extending and making the cultural box more inclusive. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newsbury Park: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, S. (1998). Researching the ‘Pastoral and the ‘Academic’. In G. Walford (Ed.), Doing research about education (pp. 11–26). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reay, D. (1995). ‘They employ cleaners to do that’: Habitus in the primary classroom. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 16(3), 353–371. doi:10.1080/0142569950160305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reay, D. (2004). It’s all becoming a habitus: Beyond the habitual use of habitus in education research. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(4), 431–444. doi:10.1080/0142569042000236934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocard, M., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Walberg-Henriksson, H., & Hemmo, V. (2007). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. http://ec.europa.eu/research/sciencesociety/document_library/pdf_06/report-rocard-on-science-education_en.pdf. Accessed May 27, 2015.

  • Sadler, T. D. (2009). Situated learning in science education: Socio-scientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 1–42. doi:10.1080/03057260802681839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiner, C., & Sjøberg, S. (2004). Sowing the seeds of ROSE: Background, rationale, questionnaire development and data collection for ROSE (the Relevance of Science Education)—a comparative study of students’ views of science and science education Acta Didactica 4. http://www.uv.uio.no/ils/english/research/projects/rose/publications/sowing-rose.pdf.

  • Skolverket. (2008). TIMSS 2007. Svenska grundskoleelevers kunskaper i matematik och naturvetenskap i ett internationellt perspektiv. Stockhom: Skolverket.

  • Skolverket. (2011). Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and the leisure-time centre 2011. www.skolverket.se/publikationer. Accessed December 16, 2011.

  • Tobin, K. (2011). Global reproduction and transformation of science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6, 127–142. doi:10.1007/s11422-010-9293-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turmo, A. (2004). Scientific literacy and socio-economic background among 15-years-old: A Nordic perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 48(3), 287–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, M. (2008). Finding science in the school body: Reflections on transgressing the boundaries of science education and the social studies of science. Science Education, 92(3), 389–403. doi:10.1002/sce.20267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickman, P.-O., & Persson, H. (2008). Naturvetenskap och naturorienterande ämnen i grundskolan: en ämnesdidaktisk vägledning. Stockholm: Liber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. E. (2006). Income inequality and population health: A review and explanation of the evidence. Social Science and Medicine, 62(7), 1768–1784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labour: How working-class kids get working-class jobs. Farnborough: Saxon House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, P., & Trondman, M. (2002). Manifesto for ethnography. Critical Studies Critical Methodologies, 2, 394–402. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zogza, V., & Ergazaki, M. (2013). Inquiry-based science education: Theory and praxis. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 7(2), 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education and Society, Malmö University, 20506, Malmö, Sweden

    Anna Jobér

Authors
  1. Anna Jobér
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Jobér.

Additional information

Lead Editor: W. Pitts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jobér, A. Revising laboratory work: sociological perspectives on the science classroom. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 12, 615–635 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9765-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9765-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation