Abstract
This study examined how a contextually based authentic science experience affected the science identities of urban high school students who have been marginalized during their K-12 science education. We examined students’ perceptions of the intervention as an authentic science experience, how the experience influenced their science identity, as well as their perceptions about who can do science. We found that the students believed the experience to be one of authentic science, that their science identity was positively influenced by participation in the experience, and that they demonstrated a shift in perceptions from stereotypical to more diverse views of scientists. Implications for science education are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aschbacher, P. R., Li, E., & Roth, E. J. (2010). Is science me? High school students’ identities, participation and aspirations in science, engineering, and medicine. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(5), 564–592. doi:10.1002/tea.20353.
Barton, A. C. (1998). Teaching science with homeless children: Pedagogy, representation, and identity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 379–394.
Basu, S. J., & Barton, A. C. (2007). Developing a sustained interest in science among urban minority youth. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(3), 466–489. doi:10.1002/tea.20143.
Bencze, L., & Bowen, G. M. (2009). A national science fair: Exhibiting support for the knowledge economy. International Journal of Science Education, 31(18), 2459–2483. doi:10.1080/09500690802398127.
Brickhouse, N. W., & Potter, J. T. (2001). Young women’s scientific identity formation in an urban context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 965–980. doi:10.1002/tea.1041.
Brown, B. A., Reveles, J. M., & Kelly, G. J. (2005). Scientific literacy and discursive identity: A theoretical framework for understanding science learning. Science Education, 89(5), 779–802. doi:10.1002/sce.20069.
Buxton, C. (2006). Creating contextually authentic science in a “low-performing” urban elementary school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(7), 695–721. doi:10.1002/tea.20105.
Buxton, C., & Lee, O. (2010). An overview of student diversity and science outcomes. In J. A. Banks (Ed.), Diversity and equity in science education (1st ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Carlone, H., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187. doi:10.1002/tea.20237.
Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientists: The draw-a-scientist test. Science Education, 67(2), 255–265. doi:10.1002/sce.3730670213.
Chapman, A., & Feldman, A. (2016) Marginalized students learning of science practices during an algal biofuel project at an urban high school. Science-Research and Service-Learning, Information Age Publishing, (in press).
Chen, X. (2009). Students who study science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in postsecondary education. Stats in brief. NCES 2009-161. National Center for Education Statistics.
Chinn, C., & Malhotra, B. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry for schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175–218. doi:10.1002/sce.10001.
Finson, K. D. (2002). Drawing a scientist: What we do and do not know after fifty years of drawings. School Science and Mathematics, 102(7), 334–345. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb18217.x.
Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125. doi:10.2307/1167322.
Grimm, L. (1993). Statistical applications for the behavioral sciences. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2011). A family resemblance approach to the nature of science for science education. Science and Education, 20(7–8), 591–607. doi:10.1007/s11191-010-9293-4.
Kardash, C. M. (2000). Evaluation of undergraduate research experience: Perceptions of undergraduate interns and their faculty mentors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 191–201. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.191.
Karunanayake, D., & Nauta, M. M. (2004). The relationship between race and students’ identified career role models and perceived role model influence. The Career Development Quarterly, 52(3), 225–234. doi:10.1002/j.2161-0045.2004.tb00644.x.
Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2009). A typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality and Quantity, 43(2), 265–275. doi:10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3.
Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V., Foy, P., & Stanco, G. M. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in science. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
National Research Council. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
NCES. (2009). National assessment of educational progress. Retrieved July 3, 2011.
Oakes, J. (1990). Multiplying inequalities: The effects of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn mathematics and science. Santa Monica, CA: Oakes, J.
Oakes, J. (2000). Course-taking and achievement: Inequalities that endure and change. Detroit, MI: Paper presented at the National Institute for Science Education Forum.
Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Pike, A. G., & Dunne, M. (2011). Student reflections on choosing to study science post-16. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6, 485–500. doi:10.1007/s11422-010-9273-7.
PISA. (2012). United States Country note—Results from PISA 2012. Retrieved June 16, 2014, from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/PISA-2012-results-US.pdf.
Rahm, J. (2007). Youths’ and scientists’ authoring of and positioning within science and scientists’ work. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(4), 645–766. doi:10.1007/s11422-006-9020-2.
Roberts, J. K., Henson, R. K., Tharp, B. Z., & Moreno, N. (2001). An examination of change in teaching self-efficacy beliefs in science education based on duration of inservice activities. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12(3), 199–213. doi:10.1023/A:1016708016311.
Seiler, G. (2001). Reversing the “standard” direction: Science emerging from the lives of African American students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 9(38), 1000–1014.
Smedley, A., & Smedley, B. D. (2005). Race as biology is fiction, racism as a social problem is real: Anthropological and historical perspectives on the social construction of race. American Psychologist, 60(1), 16.
Students. (n.d.). Retrieved March 1, 2016 from http://www.fldoe.org/eias/eiaspubs/pubstudent.asp.
TIMSS. (2007). Science achievement of fourth- and eighth-graders between 1995 and 2007. http://nces.ed.gov/timss/results07_science95.asp.
Walls, L. (2012). Third grade African American students’ views of the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1), 1–37. doi:10.1002/tea.20450.
Zirkel, S. (2002). Is there a place for me? Role models and academic identity among white students and students of color. The Teachers College Record, 104(2), 357–376. doi:10.1111/1467-9620.00166.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Lead Editor: F. Rezende.
Appendix: Semi-structured interview protocol
Appendix: Semi-structured interview protocol
The following questions were used as a guide during the student interview at the end of the ABFP.
Background question
-
1.
Why are you taking this class?
-
2.
Why are you in the magnet program?
-
3.
What are your dreams for the future? What are you interested in doing after high school?
-
4.
What are your favorite subjects in school?
I’m now going to ask you some questions about this class and the project.
-
5.
What are you studying in this class now (besides the algae project)?
-
6.
How well do you understand these concepts?
-
7.
What helps you to understand them? What gets in the way?
I’m now going to ask you questions about how you responded to the survey and test.
-
8.
Tell me more about your response about your ability to do science on the pre-survey.
-
9.
When you hear the word scientist, tell me what comes to mind.
-
10.
What do you think you would need to do in order to become a scientist when you grow up?
-
11.
Tell me more about why you chose that individual on the Identify-A-Scientist survey.
-
12.
Is what you did in this project similar to/different from what you think scientists do day to day? How is it same/different?
-
13.
How does what you did in this project compare to classroom science before this project?
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chapman, A., Feldman, A. Cultivation of science identity through authentic science in an urban high school classroom. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 12, 469–491 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9723-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9723-3