Abstract
The cyclic stress in lithium-ion battery electrodes induced by repeated charge and discharge cycles causes electrode degradation and fracture, resulting in reduced battery performance and lifetime. To investigate electrode mechanics as a function of electrochemical cycling, we utilize digital image correlation (DIC) to measure the strains that develop in lithium-ion battery electrodes during lithiation and delithiation processes. A composite graphite electrode is cycled galvanostatically (with constant current) in a custom battery cell while optical images of the electrode surface are captured in situ. The strain in the electrode is computed using an in-house DIC code. On average, an unconstrained composite graphite electrode expands 1.41 % during lithiation and contracts 1.33 % during delithiation. These strain values compare favorably with predictions based on the elastic properties of the composite electrode and the expansion of graphite-lithium intercalation compounds (G-LICs). The establishment of this experimental protocol will enable future studies of the relationship between electrode mechanics and battery performance.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The C-rate normalizes the current used to cycle a battery based on the mass, m (g), and the theoretical specific capacity, Q (Ah⋅g−1), of the active material in the working electrode. For a C-rate of C/X, the working electrode should fully lithiate in X hours with a current, I (A), defined by I = Qm/X.
References
Vetter J, Novák P, Wagner M, Veit C, Möller K, Besenhard J, Winter M, Wohlfahrt-Mehrens M, Vogler C, Hammouche A (2005) Ageing mechanisms in lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sources 147:269–281. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.01.006
Qi Y, Guo H, Hector LG, Timmons A (2010) Threefold increase in the young’s modulus of graphite negative electrode during lithium intercalation. J Electrochem Soc 157(5):A558–A566. doi:10.1149/1.3327913
Beaulieu LY, Eberman KW, Turner RL, Krause LJ, Dahn JR (2001) Colossal reversible volume changes in lithium alloys. Electrochem Solid-State Lett 4(9):A137–A140. doi:10.1149/1.1388178
Liu XH, Huang JY (2011) In situ TEM electrochemistry of anode materials in lithium ion batteries. Energy Environ Sci 4:3844–3860. doi:10.1039/c1ee01918j
Sethuraman VA, Chon MJ, Shimshak M, Srinivasan V, Guduru PR (2010) In situ measurements of stress evolution in silicon thin films during electrochemical lithiation and delithiation. J Power Sources 195:5062–5066. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.02.013
Bower AF, Guduru PR, Sethuraman VA (2011) A finite strain model of stress, diffusion, plastic flow, and electrochemical reactions in a lithium-ion half-cell. J Mech Phys Solids 59:804–828. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2011.01.003
Deshpande R, Cheng YT, Verbrugge MW (2010) Modeling diffusion-induced stress in nanowire electrode structures. J Power Sources 195:5081–5088. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.02.021
Li J, Lewis RB, Dahn JR (2007) Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose. Electrochem Solid-State Lett 10(2):A17–A20. doi:10.1149/1.2398725
Timmons A, Dahn J R (2006) In situ optical observations of particle motion in alloy negative electrodes for Li-ion batteries. J Electrochem Soc 153(6):A1206–A1210. doi:10.1149/1.2194611
Sethuraman VA, Van Winkle N, Abraham DP, Bower AF, Guduru PR (2012) Real-time stress measurements in lithium-ion battery negative-electrodes. J Power Sources 206:334–342. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.01.036
Sethuraman VA, Nguyen A, Chon MJ, Nadimpalli SPV, Wang H, Abraham DP, Bower AF, Shenoy VB, Guduru PR (2013) Stress evolution in composite silicon electrodes during lithiation/delithiation. J Electrochem Soc 160(4):A739–A746. doi:10.1149/2.021306jes
Qi Y, Harris SJ (2010) In situ observation of strains during lithiation of a graphite electrode. J Electrochem Soc 157(6):A741–A747. doi:10.1149/1.3377130
Berfield TA, Patel JK, Shimmin RG, Braun PV, Lambros J, Sottos NR (2006) Fluorescent image correlation for nanoscale deformation measurements. Small 2(5):631–635. doi:10.1002/smll.200500289
Berfield TA, Patel JK, Shimmin RG, Braun PV, Lambros J, Sottos NR (2007) Micro- and nanoscale deformation measurement of surface and internal planes via digital image correlation. Exp Mech 47:51–62. doi:10.1007/s11340-006-0531-2
Hamilton AR, Sottos NR, White SR (2010) Local strain concentrations in a microvascular network. Exp Mech 50:255–263. doi:10.1007/s11340-009-9299-5
Van Blaaderen A, Vrij A (1992) Synthesis and characterization of colloidal dispersions of fluorescent, monodisperse silica spheres. Langmuir 8(12):2921–2931
Matweb (2013) Graphite (Carbon C). www.matweb.com
Verma P, Maire P, Novák P (2010) A review of the features and analyses of the solid electrolyte interphase in Li-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 55:6332–6341. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2010.05.072
Eberl C (2010) Digital image correlation and tracking. http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/12413
Jones EMC (2013) Improved digital image correlation. http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/43073-improveddigitalimage-correlation-dic
Mathworks (2012) Normalized 2-D cross-correlation (normxcorr2). http://www.mathworks.com/help/images/ref/normxcorr2.html
Barlow J (1976) Optimal stress locations in finite element models. Int J Num Methods Eng 10:243–251
Tortorelli DA (2010) Solid mechanics : analysis and design with the finite element method. Electronic Publication, Urbana
Dahn JR (1991) Phase Diagram of LixC6. Phys Rev B 44(17):9170–9177
Dahn JR, Fong R, Spoon MJ (1990) Suppression of staging in lithium-intercalated carbon by disorder in the host. Phys Rev B 42(10):6424–6432
Chemical Book (2010) Carboxymethyl cellulose. http://www.chemicalbook.com/ChemicalProductProperty_EN_CB5.209844.htm
International Programme on Chemical Safety (2012) Carbon black. http://www.inchem.org/documents/icsc/icsc/eics0471.htm
Verhaegh NAM, Van Blaaderen A (1994) Dispersions of rhodamine-labeled silica spheres: synthesis, characterization, and fluorescence confocal scanning laser microscopy. Langmuir 10:1427–1438
Whitney JM, McCullough RL (1990) Micromechanical materials modeling. Technomic Publishing Company, Inc., Lancaster
Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1988) Cellular solids. Pergamon Press, New York
Rosen BW, Hashin Z (1970) Effective thermal expansion coefficients and specific heats of composite materials. Int J Engng Sci 8:157–173
Zheng H, Zhang L, Liu G, Song X, Battaglia VS (2012) Correlationship between electrode mechanics and long-term cycling performance for graphite anode in lithium ion cells. J Power Sources 217:530–537. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.06.045
Acknowledgements
This work was supported as part of the Center for Electrical Energy Storage - Tailored Interfaces, an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences under Award Number 919 DOE ANL 9F-31921NS. The authors would like to acknowledge the Imaging Technology Group at the Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology for use of microscopy equipment, Dr. Andrew Gewirth at the University of Illinois for insightful discussions, and Dr. Joseph Lyding for use of spot welding equipment. E. Jones was supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship, and M. Silberstein was supported by the Arnold and Mabel Beckman Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Continuing the model in section “Analytical Prediction of Composite Electrode Expansion”, the shear modulus of a complete composite electrode, G e , is estimated by applying the “S-Combining Rule” [28] for graphite particulates in a porous matrix according to:
with
where G pm is the shear modulus of the CB/CMC porous matrix, calculated from the bulk modulus, K pm (equation (11)), and the Poisson’s ratio, ν pm = 1/3, of the porous matrix assuming isotropy, and G g is the shear modulus of G-LICs, calculated from the bulk modulus, K g , and the Poisson’s ratio, ν g , of the G-LICs assuming isotropy. All other variables are defined in section “Analytical Prediction of Composite Electrode Expansion”.
The Young’s modulus of the porous composite electrode is calculated from the predicted shear modulus, G e , and bulk modulus, K e , assuming isotropy. It was found to range between 0.46 GPa and 0.48 GPa depending on the lithium content of the G-LICs, which is two orders of magnitude smaller than the modulus of G-LICs. Moreover, the Young’s modulus of the electrode is predicted to remain nearly constant for all lithium contents, despite a three-fold increase in the modulus of G-LICs.
Zheng et al. experimentally measured the Young’s modulus of unlithiated electrodes comprised of 88.8 wt.% graphite, 8 wt.% polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) binder, and 3.2 wt.% carbon black with 35 vol.% porosity [32]. They found that the Young’s modulus lies in the range of 0.26 GPa to 0.69 GPa. This is in good agreement with the predicted modulus.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jones, E.M.C., Silberstein, M.N., White, S.R. et al. In Situ Measurements of Strains in Composite Battery Electrodes during Electrochemical Cycling. Exp Mech 54, 971–985 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-014-9873-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-014-9873-3