Abstract
The FAO56 Penman–Monteith (FAO56-PM) method is known as the standard method for estimating reference evapotranspiration (ET0) in a variety of climate types. Global solar radiation (Rs) is one of the essential inputs of this model, which is usually estimated from the Angstrom–Prescott (AP) method. The major drawback of the FAO56 pre-defined AP coefficients application is that the AP coefficients might need local calibration, to estimate ET0 accurately. The aim of this study is to compare the effect of the FAO56 pre-defined AP coefficients (i.e. a and b) and the locally calibrated ones, on estimating daily ET0 in 15 sites over Iran. Using long-term (1980–2007) experimental global solar radiation data (Rs), new locally calibrated (a) and (b) coefficients are suggested and new ET0 values are determined accordingly. It was found that the range of the calibrated AP coefficients (a, b) are climate dependent and locally different from those of recommended by the FAO56-PM method. Estimated ET0 at daily scale, improved up to 72.7 % when the calibrated AP coefficients were applied instead of FAO56 pre-defined AP coefficients. Based on the results, applying the FAO56 pre-defined AP coefficients (i.e. a = 0.25 and b = 0.50) in northern subtropical-humid and southern hot climates caused larger ET0 errors. By contrast, the least ET0 errors were found in cool arid and cool semi-arid inland climates, locating about 1,330 above sea level. The correlations between the calibrated AP coefficients and geographical factors are also discussed in this research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmad MJ, Tiwari GN (2011) Solar radiation models—a review. Int J Energy Res 35:271–290. doi:10.1002/er.1690
Al-Ghobari HM (2000) Estimation of reference evapotranspiration for southern region of Saudi Arabia. Irrig Sci. doi:10.1007/s002710050004
Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration—Guidelines for computing crop water requirements—FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. http://kimberly.uidaho.edu/ref-et/fao56.pdf
Allen RG, Clemmens AJ, Burt CM, Solomon K, O’Halloran T (2005) Prediction accuracy for projecting evapotranspiration using crop coefficients and reference evapotranspiration. J Irrig Drain Eng 131(1):24–36. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2005)131:1(24)
Allen RG, Pruitt WO, Wright JL, Howell TA, Ventura F, Snyder R, Itenfisu D, Steduto P, Berengena J, Beselga J, Smith M, Pereira LS, Raes D, Perrier A, Alves I, Walter I, Elliott R (2006) A recommendation on standardized surface resistance for hourly calculation of reference ETo by the FAO56 Penman–Monteith method. Agric Water Manag 81:1–22. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2005.03.007
Almorox J, Hontoria C (2004) Global solar radiation estimation using sunshine duration in Spain. Energy Convers Manag 45:1529–1535. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2003.08.022
Almorox J, Benito M, Hontoria C (2008) Estimation of global solar radiation in Venezuela. INCI 33(4):280–283. http://www.scielo.org.ve/pdf/inci/v33n4/art09.pdf
Angstrom A (1924) Solar and terrestrial radiation. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 50:121–125
Belcher BN, DeGaetano AT (2007) A revised empirical model to estimate solar radiation using automated surface weather observations. Sol Energy 81(3):329–345. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2006.07.003
Boisvert JB, Hayhoe HN, Dubé PA (1990) Improving the estimation of global solar radiation across Canada. Agric For Meteorol 52:275–286. doi:10.1016/0168-1923(90)90086-L
Garcia M, Raes D, Allen R, Herbas C (2004) Dynamics of reference evapotranspiration in the Bolivian highlands (Altiplano). Agric For Meteorol 125:67–82. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.03.005
Heydarpour M, Mousavi SF, Hashemi SE (2007) Calibration of Penman–Monteith equation for estimation of net solar radiation in Isfahan region. J Soil Water 2(21):171–180 (Ferdowsi University, Iran, in Persian)
Hidalgo HG, Cayan DR, Dettinger MD (2005) Sources of variability of evapotranspiration in California. J Hydrometeorol 6:3–19. http://tenaya.ucsd.edu/~dettinge/hidalgo_eto.pdf
Iqbal M (1983) An introduction to solar radiation. Academic, New York
Islamic Republic of Iran Meteorological Office (IRIMO) (1980–2007) Annual year book reports, Data Center, Tehran, Iran
Jafarpur K, Yaghoubi MA (1989) Solar radiation for Shiraz, Iran. Sol Wind Technol 6(2):177–179
Kashefipour M, Sepaskhah AR (1997) Determination of locally calibrated radiation coefficients for Molasani, Khuzestan (Iran). J Agric 20:17–26 (Shahid Chamran University of Ahwaz, in Persian)
Khalili A, Rezai-e Sadr H (1997) Estimation of global solar radiation over Iran based on climatological data. Q J Geogr Res 3:15–35 (in Persian)
Kjaersgaard J (2007) Estimation of energy balance components for surfaces with low vegetation. Dissertation, University of Copenhagen
Kloss S, Pushpalatha R, Kamoyo KJ, Schütze N (2012) Evaluation of crop models for simulating and optimizing deficit irrigation systems in arid and semi-arid countries under climate variability. Water Resour Manag 26:997–1014. doi:10.1007/s11269-011-9906-y
Lascano RJ, van Bavel CHM (2007) Explicit and recursive calculation of potential and actual evapotranspiration. Agron J 99:585–590. doi:10.2134/agronj2006.0159
Li H, Lian Y, Wang X, Ma W, Zhao L (2011) Solar constant values for estimating solar radiation. Energy 36(3):1785–1789. doi:10.1002/er.1690
Liu X, Mei X, Li Y, Wang Q, Zhang Y, Porter JR (2009a) Variation in reference crop evapotranspiration caused by the Angstrom–Prescott coefficient: locally calibrated versus the FAO recommended. Agric Water Manag 96(7):1137–1145. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2009.03.005
Liu X, Mei X, Li Y, Zhang Y, Wang Q, Jensen JR, Porter JR (2009b) Calibration of the Angstrom–Prescott coefficients (a, b) under different time scales and their impacts in estimating global solar radiation in the Yellow River basin. Agric For Meteorol 149:697–710. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.10.027
Malek E (1979) Determination of the constants for the global radiation equation at Badjgah, Iran. Agric Meteorol 20:233–235. doi:10.1016/0002-1571(79)90024-4
Mohawesh OE (2010) Spatio-temporal calibration of Blaney–Criddle equation in arid and semiarid environment. Water Resour Manag 24:2187–2201. doi:10.1007/s11269-009-9546-7
Moradi I (2009) Quality control of global solar radiation using sunshine duration hours. J Energy 34(1):1–6. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2008.09.006
Persaud N, Lesolle D, Ouattara M (1997) Coefficients of the Angstrom–Prescott equation for estimating global irradiance from hours of bright sunshine in Botswana and Niger. Agric For Meteorol 88:27–35. doi:10.1016/S0168-1923(97)00054-3
Perugu M, Singam AJ, Kamasani CSR (2013) Multiple linear correlation analysis of daily reference evapotranspiration. Water Resour Manag. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0250-7
Prescott JA (1940) Evaporation from a water surface in relation to solar radiation. Trans R Soc Sci Aust 64:114–125. http://www.samuseum.sa.gov.au/Journals/TRSSA/TRSSA_V064/trssa_v064_p114p118.pdf
Rahimikhoob A, Behbahani MR, Fakheri J (2012) An evaluation of four reference evapotranspiration models in a subtropical climate. Water Resour Manag 26:2867–2881. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0054-9
Sabziparvar AA, Shetaee H (2007) Estimation of global solar radiation in arid and semi-arid climates of East and West Iran. J Energy 32:649–655. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2006.05.005
Samani Z (2000) Estimating solar radiation and evapotranspiration using minimum climatological data. J Irrig Drain Eng 126(4):265–267. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2000)126:4(265)
Tabari H (2010) Evaluation of reference crop evapotranspiration equations in various climates. Water Resour Manag 24:2311–2337. doi:10.1007/s11269-009-9553-8
Temesgen B, Eching S, Davidoff B, Frame K (2005) Comparison of some reference evapotranspiration equations for California. J Irrig Drain Eng 131(1):73–84. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2005)131:1(73)
Trajkovic S, Kolakovic S (2009) Evaluation of reference evapotranspiration equations under humid conditions. Water Resour Manag 23:3057–3067. doi:10.1007/s11269-009-9423-4
Traore S, Guven A (2012) Regional-specific numerical models of evapotranspiration using Gene-Expression Programming interface in Sahel. Water Resour Manag 26:4367–4380. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0149-3
Trnka M, Eitzinger J, Kapler P, Dubrovský M, Semerádová D, Žalud Z, Formayer H (2007) Effect of estimated daily global solar radiation data on the results of crop growth models. Sensors 7:2330–2362. doi:10.3390/s7102330
Wu SH, Yin YH, Zheng D, Yang QY (2006) Moisture conditions and climate trends in China during the period 1971–2000. Int J Climatol 26(2):193–206. doi:10.1002/joc.1245
Xu CY, Singh VP (2002) Cross comparison of empirical equations for calculating potential evapotranspiration with data from Switzerland. Water Resour Manag 16:197–219
Yin Y, Wu S, Zheng D, Yang Q (2008) Radiation calibration of FAO56 Penman–Monteith model to estimate reference crop evapotranspiration in China. Agric Water Manag 95:77–84. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2007.09.002
Yorukoglu M, Celik AN (2006) A critical review on the estimation of daily global solar radiation from sunshine duration. Energy Convers Manag 47:2441–2450. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2005.11.002
Zarch MAA, Malekinezhad H, Mobin MH, Dastorani MT, Kousari MR (2011) Drought monitoring by reconnaissance drought index (RDI) in Iran. Water Resour Manag 25:3485–3504. doi:10.1007/s11269-011-9867-1
Acknowledgments
Authors would like to thank the Islamic Republic of Iran Meteorological Office (IRIMO) Data Centre for providing the daily weather data. Authors also express their gratitude to the observers who collected radiation data in solar radiation sites. This work was financially supported by the Office of Research and Technology (ORT), Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix A (Statistics)
Appendix A (Statistics)
Pi and Oi are the ith predicted and observed values, respectively; \( \overline{O} \) is the observed daily averaged value; and n is the total number of observations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sabziparvar, A.A., Mousavi, R., Marofi, S. et al. An Improved Estimation of the Angstrom–Prescott Radiation Coefficients for the FAO56 Penman–Monteith Evapotranspiration Method. Water Resour Manage 27, 2839–2854 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0318-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0318-z