Skip to main content
Log in

Infinitesimals are too small for countably infinite fair lotteries

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We show that infinitesimal probabilities are much too small for modeling the individual outcome of a countably infinite fair lottery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For any finite number \(x\) in an ordered field \(F\) extending the reals, there is a standard part \(\mathrm{St }x\), which is the unique real number such that \(x-\mathrm{St }x\) is infinitesimal (we can let \(\mathrm{St }x = \sup \{ y \in \mathbb R : y < x \}\)).

  2. Let \(P^\gamma (A) = \mathrm{St }P(A) + \gamma (P(A) - \mathrm{St }P(A))\). Then it is easy to see that \(P^\gamma \) is a finitely additive probability measure if \(P\) is, and \(P^\gamma (\{ n \}) = \gamma P(\{n\}) = \gamma \delta \), since \(\mathrm{St }P(\{ n\}) = 0\) as \(P(\{n\})\) is infinitesimal.

  3. For instance, we might let \(M\) be the unique hypernatural number such that \(M \le 1/\sqrt{\delta } < M+1\). Then \(\delta /(1/M) = M\delta \le \sqrt{\delta }\). But \(\sqrt{\delta }\) is infinitesimal if \(\delta \) is, so \(\delta \ll 1/M\).

  4. The author is grateful to three anonymous readers for comments that have improved this paper.

References

  • Bernstein, A. R., & Wattenberg, F. (1969). Non-standard measure theory. In W. A. J. Luxemberg (Ed.), Applications of model theory of algebra, analysis, and probability. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbae, D., Stinchcombe, M. B., & Zeman, J. (2009). An introduction to mathematical analysis for economic theory and econometrics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elga, A. (2004). Infinitesimal chances and the laws of nature. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 82, 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hájek, A. (2011). Staying regular?. In Australasian Association of Philosophy Conference.

  • Kadane, J. B., Schervish, M. J., & Seidenfeld, T. (1996). Reasoning to a foregone conclusion. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 1228–1235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mourges, M. H., & Ressayre, J. P. (1993). Every real closed field has an integer part. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 58, 641–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, A.P. (2012). Impossibility results for any theory of non-Archimedean expected value (manuscript).

  • Pruss, A. R. (2012). Infinite lotteries, perfectly thin darts and infinitesimals. Thought, 1, 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schervish, M. J., Seidenfeld, T., & Kadane, J. B. (1984). The extent of non-conglomerability of finitely additive probabilities. Probability Theory and Related Fields, 66, 205–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenmackers, S., & Horsten, L. (2013). Fair infinite lotteries, Synthese, 190(1), 37–61.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander R. Pruss.

Appendix: The uncountability of \([M]\)

Appendix: The uncountability of \([M]\)

One of our arguments used the fact that \([M]\), i.e., the set of hypernaturals less than or equal to \(M\), is an uncountable set when \(M\) is infinite. This follows from standard facts about hyperreals [e.g., Lemma 11.2.2 of Corbae et al. (2009)], but it is worth giving a simple proof that works not just in the case of the hyperreals, but for any extension of the reals that has an analogue of the hyperintegers.

Let \(F\) be any totally ordered field containing the real numbers as an ordered subfield. Say that a subset \(Z\) of \(F\) is a set of \(F\)-integers provided that (a) \(0\in Z\) and (b) for every positive \(x\in F\), there is a unique \(n\in Z\) such that \(n \le x < n+1\). This unique \(n\) is called the integer part of \(x\) (see Mourges and Ressayre 1993), and we will write \(n=\lfloor {x}\rfloor _Z\). Write \([M]_Z = \{ n \in Z : 0 < n \le M \}\). Say that \(M\in F\) is infinite provided that \(x<|M|\) for all real \(x\) (thus, \(M\) is infinite if and only if \(1/M\) is infinitesimal).

Theorem

If \(M \in F\) is infinite and positive, then \([M]_Z\) has at least the cardinality of the continuum, and in particular is uncountable.

Proof

Write \((0,1)\) for the interval of all real numbers strictly between 0 and 1. Let \(A = \{ \lfloor {xM}\rfloor _Z : x \in (0,1) \}\). Observe that \((0,1)\) and \(A\) have the same cardinality. For let \(f(x) = \lfloor {xM}\rfloor _Z\). This is a function from \((0,1)\) onto all of \(A\). To get that \((0,1)\) and \(A\) have the same cardinality, we need only prove that \(f\) is one-to-one. To do this, suppose \(f(x)=f(y)\) for \(x\) and \(y\) in \((0,1)\). Then \(\lfloor {xM}\rfloor _Z=\lfloor {yM}\rfloor _Z\) and there is an \(n\in Z\) such that \(n \le xM < n+1\) and \(n \le yM < n+1\). It follows that \(|xM-yM|< 1\). Thus, \(|x-y|M <1\) as \(M\) is positive, and so \(|x-y| < 1/M\). But if \(M\) is infinite, then \(1/M\) is infinitesimal, and the non-negative real number \(|x-y|\) is less than that infinitesimal. But the only non-negative real number less than an infinitesimal is zero, so \(|x-y|=0\) and hence \(x=y\). Thus, \(f\) is one-to-one and onto, and so \(A\) has the same cardinality as \((0,1)\), i.e., the cardinality of the continuum.

But \(A\) is a subset of \([M]_Z\) as is easy to check [every member of \(A\) is a non-negative member of \(Z\) and less than \(M\); also, \(0\notin A\) since \(M\)’s being infinite guarantees that \(xM\) is infinite for all \(x\in (0,1)\), and hence that \(\lfloor {xM}\rfloor _Z\) is also infinite for all \(x\in (0,1)\)]. Hence, \([M]_Z\) has at least the cardinality of the continuum, and in particular is uncountable.\(\square \)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pruss, A.R. Infinitesimals are too small for countably infinite fair lotteries. Synthese 191, 1051–1057 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0307-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0307-z

Keywords

Navigation