Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Beyond GDP: Classifying Alternative Measures for Progress

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Both the potential pitfalls of macro-economic policies focused on stimulating economic growth and the problems involved in using GDP as a measure of well-being or economic welfare have long been recognized by economists and researchers from other social sciences. Therefore, it is no surprise that alternative measures for policy-making have been developed and promoted since the early 1970s. Over the past 5 years, the development of these measures has gained momentum both politically and academically. However, most research efforts concentrate on the development and promotion of individual indicators, while paying less attention to the wide range of indicators already available and to theoretical insights. As a result, few classification schemes of alternative measures exist today to help policy-makers in selecting a proper set of indicators. This paper first looks into the different classification schemes available in the literature and outlines the weaknesses in each of these. Afterwards, an alternative classification scheme is introduced that draws on the notions of well-being, economic welfare and sustainability. A further sub-categorization is built on the different approaches that are used to quantitatively capture the notions. By focusing on the underlying concepts that the different measures aim to quantify, the alternative classification scheme overcomes the drawbacks of the existing schemes. Finally, 23 alternative measures for policy-making are reviewed and organized into the newly developed classification scheme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.wikiprogress.org/.

  2. http://www2.eur.nl/fsw/research/happiness/.

  3. http://www.calvert-henderson.com/.

  4. http://hdr.undp.org/en/.

  5. http://www.neweconomics.org/gen/.

  6. http://devdata.worldbank.org/wdi2005/.

References

  • Afsa, C., Blanchet, D., Marcus, V., Pionnier, P.-A., Rioux, L., Mira d’Ercole, M., et al. (2008). Survey of existing approaches to measuring socio-economic progress. Paris, France: Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, S. (2002). Dimensions of human development. World Development, 30(2), 181–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, R. (2005). Measuring country performance and state behavior: A survey of composite indices. UNDP/ODS background paper. New York, NY: United Nations Development Programme, Office of Development Studies.

  • Bandura, R. (2008). A survey of composite indices measuring country performance: 2008 update. Working paper. New York, NY: United Nations Development Programme, Office of Development Studies.

  • Bleys, B. (2009). Beyond GDP: The index of sustainable economic welfare. Ph.D. thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.

  • Boarini, R., Johansson, A., & Mira d’Ercole, M. (2006). Alternative measures of well-being. Social, employment and migration working papers 33. Paris, France: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

  • Clarke, M. (2005). Assessing well-being using hierarchical needs. WIDER research paper 2005/22. Helsinki, Finland: United Nations University-WIDER.

  • Cobb, C., Halstead, T., & Rowe, J. (1995). The genuine progress indicator: Summary of data and methodology. San Francisco, CA: Redefining Progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conceição, P., & Bandura, R. (2008). Measuring subjective wellbeing: A summary review of the literature. UNDP development studies—working paper. New York, NY: Office of Development Studies, UNDP.

  • Costanza, R., Farley, J., & Templet, P. (2002). Background: Quality of life and the distribution of wealth and resources. In R. Costanza & S. Jorgensen (Eds.), Understanding and solving environmental problems in the 21st century: Toward a new, integrated hard problem science (pp. 221–258). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., Hart, M., Posner, S., & Talberth, J. (2009). Beyond GDP: The need for new measures of progress. The Pardee papers no. 4—January 2009. Boston, MA: Boston University.

  • Daly, H. (1991). Steady state economics. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H., & Cobb, J. (1989). For the common good. Redirecting the economy toward community, the environment and a sustainable future. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: economic, social and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40(1–2), 189–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, S., & Neumayer, E. (2007). Weak and strong sustainability in the SEEA: Concepts and measurement. Ecological Economics, 61(4), 617–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekins, P., & Simon, S. (2003). An illustrative application of the CRITINC framework to the UK. Ecological Economics, 44(2), 255–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekins, P., Simon, S., Deutsch, L., Folke, C., & De Groot, R. (2003). A framework for the practical application of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability. Ecological Economics, 44(2), 165–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estes, R. (1984). The social progress of nations. New York, NY: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, R. (1997). Social development trends in Europe, 1970–1994: Development prospects for the New Europe. Social Indicators Research, 42(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esty, D., Levy, M., Srebotnjak, T., & de Sherbinin, A. (2005). 2005 Environmental sustainability index: Benchmarking national environmental stewardship. New Haven: Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, J., Costanza, R., Templet, P., Corson, M., Crabbe, P., Esquivel, R., et al. (2002). Consensus: Quality of life and the distribution of wealth and resources. In R. Costanza & S. Jorgensen (Eds.), Understanding and solving environmental problems in the 21st century: Toward a new, integrated hard problem science (pp. 259–302). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, I. (1906). The nature of capital and income. New York, NY: Kelley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasper, D. (2004). Human well-being: Concepts and conceptualizations. Discussion paper 2004/06. Helsinki, Finland: United Nations University, World Institute for Development Economics Research.

  • Gasper, D. (2005). The ethics of development: From economism to human development. New Delhi, India: Vistaar Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goossens, Y., Mäkipäa, A., Schepelmann, P., van de Sand, I., Kuhndtand, M., & Herrndorf, M. (2007). Alternative progress indicators to gross domestic progress (GDP) as a means towards sustainable development. IP/A/ENVI/ST/2007-10. Brussel, Belgium: Policy Department, Economic and Scientific Policy (European Parliament).

  • Hagerty, M., Cummins, R., Ferriss, A., Land, K., Michalos, A., Peterson, M., et al. (2001). Quality of life indexes for national policy: Review and agenda for research. Social Indicators Research, 55(1), 1–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, K. (1994). Green adjustments to GDP. Resources Policy, 20(3), 155–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. (1939). Value and capital. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hueting, R. (1995). Estimating sustainable national income. In W. Van Dieren (Ed.), Taking nature into account: Toward a sustainable national income (pp. 206–230). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T. (2004). Chasing progress: Beyond measuring economic growth. London, UK: nef.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keune, L., Elzinga, T., & Ruyter, T. (2006). Meta Economische Verkenningen—Voorstel voor de Ontwikkeling van een Duurzame en Solidaire Macro Economische Verkenning ±. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Attac/Voor de Verandering/XminY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawn, P. (2003). A theoretical foundation to support the index of sustainable economic welfare (ISEW), genuine progress indicator (GPI), and other related indexes. Ecological Economics, 44(1), 105–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. New York, NY: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, N., Simms, A., Thompson, S., & Abdallah, S. (2006). The happy planet index: An Index of human well-being and environmental impact. London, UK: nef.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(2), 370–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Max-Neef, M. (1992). Development and human needs. In P. Ekins & M. Max-Neef (Eds.), Real-life economics: understand wealth creation (pp. 97–213). London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. (1979). Measuring the conditions of the world’s poor: The physical quality of life index. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer, E. (1999). The ISEW: Not an index of sustainable economic welfare. Social Indicators Research, 48(1), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer, E. (2003). Weak versus strong sustainability: Exploring the limits of two opposing paradigms. The John Robert Seeley lectures. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer, E. (2004). Indicators of sustainability. In T. Tietenberg (Ed.), International yearbook of environmental and resource economics 2004/2005 (pp. 139–188). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W., & Tobin, J. (1972). Is growth obsolete? In N. B. of Economic Research (Ed.), Economic growth (pp. 1–80). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. The John Robert Seeley lectures. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Offer, A. (2003). Economic welfare measures and human well-being. In P. David & M. Thomas (Eds.), The economic future in historical perspective (pp. 371–399). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osberg, L., & Sharpe, A. (1998). An index of economic well-being for Canada. Research paper R-99-3E, Applied Research Branch, Human Resources Development Canada.

  • Osberg, L., & Sharpe, A. (2002). An index of economic well-being for selected OECD countries. Review of Income and Wealth, 48(3), 291–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Repetto, R., Magrath, W., Wells, M., Beer, C., & Rossini, F. (1989). Wasting assets: Natural resources in the national income and product accounts. Washington, DC: World Resource Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. (1961). The evaluation of ‘social income’: Capital formation and wealth. In F. Lutz & D. Hague (Eds.), The theory of capital (pp. 32–57). London, UK: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schokkaert, E. (2007). The capabilities approach. Discussion paper CES 0734. Leuven, Belgium: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Center for Economic Studies.

  • Sen, A. (1985). Commodities and capabilities. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2004). Capabilities, lists and public reasoning: Continuing the conversation. Feminist Economics, 10(3), 77–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Paris, France: Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress.

  • Tobin, J. (2005). Fisher’s the nature of capital and income. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 64(1), 207–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2003). Handbook of national accounting, integrated environmental and economic accounting. New York, NY: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN, EU, IMF, OECD and World Bank. (2005). Integrated environmental and economic accounting 2003. New York, NY: United Nations, European Union, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and the World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNECE, OECD, & Eurostat (2008). Measuring sustainable development. Report of the joint UNECE/OECD/Eurostat working group on statistics for sustainable development. New York, NY: United Nations.

  • Van de Kerk, G., & Manuel, A. (2008). A comprehensive index for a sustainable society: The SSI—the sustainable society index. Ecological Economics, 66(2), 228–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bergh, J. (2009). The GDP paradox. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(2), 117–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (1996). Happy life expectancy: A comprehensive measure of quality-of-life in nations. Social Indicators Research, 39(1), 1–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2002). Why social policy needs subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 58(1), 33–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2004). Subjective measures of well-being. WIDER research paper 2004/7. Helsinki, Finland: United Nations University, WIDER.

  • Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996). Our Ecological Footprint. Reducing human impact on earth. Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesselink, B., Bakkes, J., Best, A., Hinterberger, F., & ten Brink, P. (2007). Measurement beyond GDP. Background paper for the conference beyond GDP: Measuring progress, true wealth, and the well-being of nations. Available at http://www.beyond-gdp.eu/download/bgdp-bp-mbgdp.pdf [viewed on May 12, 2011].

  • Zolotas, X. (1981). Economic growth and declining social welfare. New York, NY: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Business and Public Administration, University College Ghent, Voskenslaan 270, 9000, Ghent, Belgium

    Brent Bleys

Authors
  1. Brent Bleys
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brent Bleys.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bleys, B. Beyond GDP: Classifying Alternative Measures for Progress. Soc Indic Res 109, 355–376 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9906-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9906-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation