Skip to main content
Log in

An analysis of differential response patterns on the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-IIIB in struggling adult readers and third-grade children

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-IIIB (PPVT-IIIB) performance of 130 adults identified as struggling readers, in comparison to 175 third-grade children. Response patterns to the items on the PPVT-IIIB by these two groups were investigated, focusing on items, semantic categories, and lexical features, including word length, word class, and word frequency. The score distributional properties of the two groups were different, but there were similarities and differences found in different response patterns. Analyses of word length, word class, and word frequency in the two groups’ performance resulted in counterintuitive findings for the adult participants. The struggling adult learners’ vocabulary repertoire might have been shaped by their real-life experiences rather than formal schooling. Implications and future research directions are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Research supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the National Institute for Literacy, and the US Department of Education—grant # R01 HD43801.

References

  • Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P., & Freebody, R. C. (1983). Reading comprehension and the assessment and acquisition of word knowledge. Advances in Reading/Language Research, 2, 231–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. C., & Nagy, W. E. (1992). The vocabulary conundrum. American Educator, 16(14–18), 44–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, E., Bretherton, I., & Synder, L. (1988). From first words to grammar: Individual differences and dissociable mechanisms. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (1983). Learning words well—A program to enhance vocabulary and comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 36, 622–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (1991). Conditions of vocabulary acquisition. In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 789–814). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biemiller, A. (2001). Teaching vocabulary: Early, direct and sequential. American Educator, 25, 24–28. Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers.

  • Biemiller, A., & Slonim, N. (2001). Estimating root word vocabulary growth in normative and advantaged populations: Evidence for a common sequence of vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 498–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolger, D. J., Balass, M., Landen, E., & Perfetti, C. A. (2008). Contextual variation and definitions in learning the meanings of words. Discourse Processes, 45, 122–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S., & Gopnik, A. (1995). Early acquisition of verbs in Korean: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Child Language, 22, 497–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale, E., & O’Rourke, J. (1986). Vocabulary building: A process approach. Columbus, OH: Zaner-Bloser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M. (2009). The corpus of contemporary American English (COCA). Retrieved from http://www.americancorpus.org/.

  • Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Peabody picture vocabulary test (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edit Central. (2009). Edit central. Retrieved from http://www.editcentral.com/gwt/com.editcentral.EC/EC.html.

  • Gentner, D. (1982). Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In S. Kuczaj II (Ed.), Language development, vol. 2: Language, thought and culture (pp. 301–334). Hilsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golinkoff, R., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2008). How toddlers learn verbs. Trends in Cognitive Science, 12, 397–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabe, W. (2004). Research on teaching reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 44–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, D., & Nation, P. (1992). What vocabulary size is needed to read unsimplified texts for pleasure? Reading in a Foreign Language, 8, 689–696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamil, M. L., & Hiebert, E. H. (2005). The teaching and learning of vocabulary: Perspectives and persistent issues. In E. H. Hiebert & M. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing scientific research to practice (pp. 1–26). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W. (1994). Text comprehension, memory, and learning. American Psychologist, 49, 294–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. (2011). Size matters: Early vocabulary as a predictor of language and literacy competence. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(1), 69–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, E. (1998). Frequency spectra within word-length classes. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 5, 224–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucariello, J., Kyratzis, A., & Nelson, K. (1992). Taxonomic knowledge: What kind and when? Child Development, 63, 978–998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manly, J., Byrd, D., Touradji, P., Sanchez, D., & Stern, Y. (2004). Literacy and cognitive change among ethnically diverse elders. International Journal of Psychology, 39, 47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L. T., & Lee, C. J. (1993). Construct validation of the Peabody picture vocabulary test-revised: A structural equation model of the acquisition order of words. Psychological Assessment, 5, 438–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monsell, S. (1991). The nature and locus of word frequency effects. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 148–197). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, W. E., Anderson, R. C., & Herman, P. A. (1987). Learning word meanings from context during normal reading. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 237–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, W. E., & Herman, P. A. (1987). Breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge: Implications for acquisition and instruction. In M. McKeown & M. Curtis (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 19–35). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, W. E., & Scott, J. A. (2000). Vocabulary processes. In M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 269–284). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Reading Panel (NRP)-Report of the subgroups. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NIH pub. No. 004754).

  • Nelson, K., & Nelson, A. P. (1990). Category production in response to script and category cues by Kindergarten and second grade children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 11, 431–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakland, T., De Mesquita, P., & Buckley, K. (1988). Psychological, linguistic, and sociocultural correlates of reading among Mexican American elementary students. School Psychology International, 9, 219–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, P. D., Hiebert, E. H., & Kamil, M. L. (2007). Vocabulary assessment: What we know and what we need to learn. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2), 282–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (1987). Words and rules: The ingredients of language. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riva, D., Nichelli, F., & Devoti, M. (2000). Developmental aspects of verbal fluency and confrontation naming in children. Brain and Language, 71(2), 267–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storch, S. A., & Whitehurst, G. J. (2002). Oral language and code-related precursors to reading: Evidence from a longitudinal structural model. Developmental Psychology, 38, 934–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, K. R., Torgesen, J. K., & Wagner, R. K. (2006). Relationships between word knowledge, and reading comprehension in third-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 381–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tardif, T. (1996). Nouns are not always learned before verbs: Evidence from Mandarin speakers’ early vocabularies. Developmental Psychology, 32, 492–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hye K. Pae.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pae, H.K., Greenberg, D. & Williams, R.S. An analysis of differential response patterns on the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-IIIB in struggling adult readers and third-grade children. Read Writ 25, 1239–1258 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9315-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9315-x

Keywords

Navigation