Skip to main content
Log in

How to make a dis-entrepreneur of the Schumpeterian entrepreneur: the impact of institutional settings on growth

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fiscal and monetary institutions are conspicuously omitted in the conventional theory of long-run economic growth. Moving from the Schumpeterian entrepreneur, who adopts new technology because its value, according to Tobin’s q, dominates the economic rents of existing capital, we argue that the Schumpeterian entrepreneur’s incentives to innovate change when he is transplanted into the public economy. We analyze two alternative institutional settings denoted as “long chain” and “short chain”. Through the “long chain” model we show that the Schumpeterian entrepreneur is driven towards “destructive creation” of new capital, thus becoming a political dis-entrepreneur, while the quasi-contractual “short chain” model provides incentives to innovate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acemoglu, D. (2006). A simple model of inefficient institutions. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 108, 515–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., & Johnson, S. (2005). Unbundling institutions. Journal of Political Economy, 113, 949–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation. American Economic Review, 91, 1369–1401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barone, E. (1908). Il ministro della produzione nello stato collettivista. Giornale degli Economisti, 9, 267–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J. (1974). Are government bonds net wealth? Journal of Political Economy, 82, 1095–1117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J. (1976). Rational expectations and the role of monetary policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 2, 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J. (1989). The Ricardian approach to budget deficits. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3, 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J. (1990). Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98, S103–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995). Economic growth. Sydney: McGraw–Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J. (1959). Business behavior, value and growth. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O., & Fischer, S. (1990). Lectures on macroeconomics. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G., & Lomasky, L. (1993). Democracy and decision. The pure theory of electoral preference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G., & Eusepi, G. (2004). Fiscal constitutionalism. In R. E. Wagner & J. Backhaus (Eds.), Handbook of public finance (pp. 53–76). Boston: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1960). La scienza delle finanze: The Italian tradition in fiscal theory. In J. M. Buchanan (Ed.), Fiscal theory and political economy. Selected essays (pp. 24–74). Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1969). Cost and choice. An inquiry in economic theory. Chicago: Markham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1975). The limits of liberty—between anarchy and Leviathan. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1976). Barro on the Ricardian equivalence theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 84, 337–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, K. H., de Figueredo, R. J. P. Jr., & Weingast, B. R. (2001). Rational choice theories of bureaucratic control and performance. In W. F. Shughart II & L. Razzolini (Eds.), The Elgar companion to public choice (pp. 271–292). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Viti de Marco, A. (1936). First principles of public finance. New York: Harcourt Brace. Translated from the Italian by Edith Pavlo Marget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggertsson, T. (1990). Economic behavior and institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eusepi, G. (2000). Contractual fiscal equivalence versus geographical fiscal equivalence. Public Choice, 104, 309–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eusepi, G. (2006). Public finance and welfare: from the ignorance of the veil to the veil of ignorance. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 59, 460–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnaut, R., & Fitzgerald, V. (2002). Review of Commonwealth-state funding final report, August.

  • Jones, P. R. (1978). The appeal of the political entrepreneur. British Journal of Political Science, 8(4), 498–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J., Maskin, E., & Roland, G. (2003). Understanding the soft budget constraint. Journal of Economic Literature, 41, 1095–1136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montemartini, G. (1902). Municipalizzazione dei pubblici servigi. Milano: Soc. Ed. Libraria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W. C. (1994). Bureaucracy and public economics. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1994). Economic performance through time. American Economic Review, 84, 359–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1997). Cliometrics—forty years later. American Economic Review, 87, 412–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C., & Thomas, R. P. (1973). The rise of the Western world: A new economic history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1969). The principle of fiscal equivalence: the division of responsibilities among different levels of government. American Economic Review, 59, 479–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (2004). Getting institutions right (Mimeo).

  • Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., & Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions rule: the primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9, 131–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, D. (2006). Advanced macroeconomics (3rd edn.). Sydney: McGraw–Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (1939). Business cycles. New York: McGraw–Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiebout, C. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q. (1980). The politics of regulation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. J., & Chaudhri, D. P. (2000). Endogeneity, knowledge and dynamics of long run capitalist economic growth. Paper presented at the 5th conference on dynamics, economic growth, and international trade, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, June.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe Eusepi.

Additional information

The authors are deeply grateful to two anonymous referees for providing insightful comments that have brought greater clarity to the argument. They also thank the Editor in Chief of the journal for patiently reviewing the manuscript. Without his suggestions this paper would not have reached its present form.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eusepi, G., Wilson, E.J. How to make a dis-entrepreneur of the Schumpeterian entrepreneur: the impact of institutional settings on growth. Public Choice 136, 39–54 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9277-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-008-9277-y

Keywords

Navigation