Skip to main content
Log in

Chromosome 9p21 rs10757278 polymorphism is associated with the risk of metabolic syndrome

  • Published:
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a common multifactorial disorder that involves abdominal obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and hyperglycemia. Genome-wide association studies have identified a major risk locus for coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction on chromosome 9p21. Here, we examined the frequency of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on chromosome 9p21 in a sample of Turkish patients with MetS and further investigated the correlation between regional SNPs, haplotypes, and MetS. The real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used to analyze 4 SNPs (rs10757274 A/G, rs2383207 A/G, rs10757278 A/G, rs1333049 C/G) in 291 MetS patients and 247 controls. Analysis of 4 SNPs revealed a significant difference in the genotype distribution for rs2383207, rs10757278, and rs1333049 between MetS patients and controls (p = 0.041, p = 0.005, p = 0.023, respectively) but not for rs10757274 (p = 0.211). MetS and control allelic frequencies for rs2383207, rs10757278, and rs1333049 were statistically different (p < 0.05). The rs2383207 AG variant, was identified as a MetS risk factor (p = 0.012, OR = 33.271; 95 % CI: 2.193–504.805) and the AA haplotype in block 1 and the GC, AG haplotypes in block 2 were associated with MetS (χ 2 = 3.875, p = 0.049; χ 2 = 9.334, p = 0.0022; χ 2 = 9.134, p = 0.0025, respectively). In this study, we found that chromosome 9p21 SNP rs10757278 and related haplotypes correlate with MetS risk. This is the first report showing an association between a 9p21 variant and MetS and suggests that rs10757278 polymorphism may confer increased risk for disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ, Cleeman JI, Donato KA et al (2009) Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation 120:1640–1645

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bosy-Westphal A, Onur S, Geisler C, Wolf A, Korth O, Pfeufferm M et al (2007) Common familial influences on clustering of metabolic syndrome traits with central obesity and insülin resistance: the Kiel obesity prevention study. Int J Obes (Lond) 31:784–790

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bellia A, Giardina E, Lauro D, Tesauro M, Di Fede G, Cusumano G et al (2009) The Linosa Study: epidemiological and heritability data of the metabolic syndrome in a Caucasian genetic isolate. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 19(7):455–461

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Henneman P, Aulchenko YS, Frants RR, van Dijk KW, Oostra BA, van Duijn CM (2008) Prevalence and heritability of the metabolic syndrome and its individual components in a Dutch isolate: the Erasmus Rucphen Family study. J Med Genet 45:572–577

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Devaney JM, Gordish-Dressman H, Harmon BT, Bradbury MK, Devaney SA, Harris TB et al (2011) AKT1 polymorphisms are associated with risk for metabolic syndrome. Hum Genet 129(2):129–139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Oguri M, Kato K, Yoshida T, Fujimaki T, Horibe H, Yokoi K et al (2011) Association of a genetic variant of BTN2A1 with metabolic syndrome in East Asian populations. J Med Genet 48(11):787–792

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sobti RC, Kler R, Sharma YP, Talwar KK, Singh N (2012) Risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes with tumor necrosis factor-α 308G/A gene polymorphism in metabolic syndrome and coronary artery disease subjects. Mol Cell Biochem 360(1–2):1–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang H, Dong S, Xu H, Qian J, Yang J (2012) Genetic variants in FTO associated with metabolic syndrome: a meta- and gene-based analysis. Mol Biol Rep 39(5):5691–5698

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Grundy SM, Brewer HB Jr, Cleeman JI, Smith SC Jr, Lenfant C (2004) American Heart Association; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Definition of metabolic syndrome: Report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/American Heart Association conference on scientific issues related to definition. Circulation 109:433–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hu G, Qiao Q, Tuomilehto J, Balkau B, Borch-Johnsen K, Pyorala K, DECODE Study Group (2004) Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome and its relation to all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in nondiabetic European men and women. Arch Intern Med 164:1066–1076

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ninomiya T, Kubo M, Doi Y, Yonemoto K, Tanizaki Y, Rahman M et al (2007) Impact of metabolic syndrome on the development of cardiovascular disease in a general Japanese population: the Hisayama study. Stroke 38:2063–2069

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. McNeill AM, Rosamond WD, Girman CJ, Golden SH, Schmidt MI, East HE et al (2005) The metabolic syndrome and 11-year risk of incident cardiovascular disease in the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Diabetes Care 28:385–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Park YM, Province MA, Gao X, Feitosa M, Wu J, Ma D et al (2009) Longitudinal trends in the association of metabolic syndrome with 550 k single nucleotide polymorphisms in the Framingham Heart Study. BMC Proc 3:S116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zeggini E, Scott LJ, Saxena R, Voight BF, Marchini JL, Hu T, Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium et al (2008) Meta-analysis of genome-wide association data and large-scale replication identifies additional susceptibility loci for type 2 diabetes. Nat Genet 40:638–645

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Frayling TM, Timpson NJ, Weedon MN, Zeggini E, Freathy RM, Lindgren CM et al (2007) A common variant in the FTO gene is associated with body mass index and predisposes to childhood and adult obesity. Science 316:889–894

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium (2007) Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature 447:661–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McPherson R, Pertsemlidis A, Kavaslar N et al (2007) A common allele on chromosome 9 associated with coronary heart disease. Science 316:1488–1491

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Helgadottir A, Thorleifsson G, Manolescu A et al (2007) A common variant on chromosome 9p21 affects the risk of myocardial infarction. Science 316:1491–1493

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Samani NJ, Erdmann J, Hall AS et al (2007) Genome-wide association analysis of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 357:443–453

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hamsten A, Eriksson P (2008) Identifying the susceptibility genes for coronary artery disease: from hyperbole through doubt to cautious optimism. J Intern Med 263(5):538–552

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cunnington MS, Santibanez Koref M, Mayosi BM, Burn J, Keavney B (2010) Chromosome 9p21 SNPs associated with multiple disease phenotypes correlate with anril expression. PLoS Genet 6:e1000899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dupont WD, Plummer WD (1990) Power and sample size calculations: a review and computer program. Control Clin Trials 11:116–128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ (2005) Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics 21:263–265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sato K, Nakagawa H, Tajima A, Yoshida K, Inoue I (2010) ANRIL is implicated in the regulation of nucleus and potential transcriptional target of E2F1. Oncol Rep 24(3):701–707

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Anderson JL, Horne BD, Kolek MJ et al (2008) Genetic variation at the 9p21 locus predicts angiographic coronary artery disease prevalence but not extent and has clinical utility. Am Heart J 156:1155–1162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Muendlein A, Saely CH, Rhomberg S et al (2009) Evaluation of the association of genetic variants on the chromosomal loci 9p21.3, 6q25.1, and 2q36.3 with angiographically characterized coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis 205:174–180

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ye S, Willeit J, Kronenberg F, Xu Q, Kiechl S (2008) Association of genetic variation on chromosome 9p21 with susceptibility and progression of atherosclerosis: a population-based, prospective study. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:378–384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bhanushali AA, Parmar N, Contractor A, Shah VT, Das BR (2011) Variant on 9p21 is strongly associated with coronary artery disease but lacks association with myocardial infarction and disease severity in a population in Western India. Arch Med Res 42(6):469–474

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yamagishi K, Folsom AR, Rosamond WD, Boerwinkle E, Investigators ARIC (2009) A genetic variant on chromosome 9p21 and incident heart failure in the ARIC study. Eur Heart J 30(10):1222–1228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Björck HM, Länne T, Alehagen U, Persson K, Rundkvist L, Hamsten A, Dahlström U, Eriksson P (2009) Association of genetic variation on chromosome 9p21.3 and arterial stiffness. J Intern Med 265(3):373–381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ujcic-Voortman JK, Bos G, Baan CA, Verhoeff AP, Seidell JC (2011) Obesity and body fat distribution: ethnic differences and the role of socio-economic status. Obes Facts 4(1):53–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Diabetes Genetics Initiative (2007) Genome-wide association analysis identifies loci for type 2 diabetes and triglyceride levels. Science 316:1331–1336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Scott LJ et al (2007) A genome-wide association study of type 2 diabetes in Finns detects multiple susceptibility variants. Science 316:1341–1345

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Zeggini E et al (2007) Replication of genome-wide association signals in UK samples reveals risk loci for type 2 diabetes. Science 316:1336–1341

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Assimes TL, Knowles JW, Basu A et al (2008) Susceptibility locus for clinical and subclinical coronary artery disease at chromosome 9p21 in the multi-ethnic ADVANCE study. Hum Mol Genet 17:2320–2328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Congrains A, Kamide K, Katsuya T, Yasuda O, Oguro R, Yamamoto K, Ohishi M, Rakugi H (2012) CVD-associated non-coding RNA, ANRIL, modulates expression of atherogenic pathways in VSMC. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 419(4):612–616

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Bayoglu B, Cengiz M, Cakmak HA, Uysal O, Yuksel H (2011) Association of a Common Variant on Chromosome 9p21 in Turkish Patients with Metabolic Syndrome. IV.International Congress of Molecular Medicine, p 61–62, 27–30 June 2011, Istanbul, Turkey

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Istanbul University. Project number 4060. The preliminary findings of this study were presented at the 4th International Congress of Molecular Medicine, June 27–30, 2011, Istanbul, Turkey [37].

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mujgan Cengiz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bayoglu, B., Cakmak, H.A., Yuksel, H. et al. Chromosome 9p21 rs10757278 polymorphism is associated with the risk of metabolic syndrome. Mol Cell Biochem 379, 77–85 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-013-1629-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-013-1629-3

Keywords

Navigation