Abstract
We evaluated changes in the Atlantic Forest landscape over the last 40 years based on changes in boundaries and mosaics, including the hypothetical landscape resulting from the application of Brazilian laws for forest protection. Mosaics were identified as sets of land-use patches with a similar pattern of boundaries. Landscapes of different years, therefore, can be distinguished by differences in mosaics. We developed a technique to identify boundaries between patches from land-use maps using ArcGis® and to build the patch x boundary matrix required for mosaic identification by means of a factorial and cluster analysis. The mosaics were characterized by some key uses as well as by their boundaries with other land uses. The mosaics were scored for forest conservation according to five issues: landscape permeability, cover, availability, quality, and fragmentation of forest. The values were based on land use and boundary patterns. Although Brazilian laws regarding forest protection have promoted conservation and the hypothetical legal landscape has presented the highest forest habitat availability, this expansion perpetuates a boundary pattern that complicates conservation and management, thus increasing the pressure on forest patches and favoring the further fragmentation of protected forest patches. These conclusions cannot be reached by simply recording changes in land uses.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antrop M (2004) Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Landsc Urban Plan 67:9–26
Antrop M (2005) Why landscapes in the past are important for the future. Landsc Urban Plan 70:21–34
Barrett GW, Peles JD (1999) Landscape ecology of small mammals. Springer, New York
Baudry J, Bourel F (2004) Trophic flows and spatial heterogeneity in agricultural landscapes. In: Polis GA, Power ME, Huxel GH (eds) Food webs at the landscape level. The University Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 317–343
Bierregaard RO Jr, Dale VH (1996) Islands in an ever-changing sea: the ecological and socioeconomic dynamics of Amazonian rain forest fragments. In: Schelhas J, Greenberg R (eds) Forest patches in tropical landscapes. Island Press, Washington, pp 187–204
Bürgi M, Hersperger AM, Schneeberger N (2004) Driving forces of landscape change—current and new directions. Landscape Ecol 19:857–868
Cadenasso MI, Pickett STA, Weathers KC, Jones CG (2003) A framework for a theory of ecological boundaries. BioScience 53(8):750–758
Cantwell MD, Forman RTT (1993) Landscape graphs: ecological modelling with graph theory to detect configurations common to diverse landscapes. Landscape Ecol 8:239–255
Cheshire P (1995) A new phase of urban development in Western Europe? The evidence for the 1980s. Urban Stud 32(7):1045–1063
Colli GR, Accacio GM, Antonini Y, Constantino R, Franceschinelli EV, Laps RR, Scariot A, Vieira MV, Wiederhecker HC (2003) A fragmentação dos ecossistemas e a biodiversidade brasileira: uma síntese [Ecosystem fragmentation and Brazilian biodiversity: a synthesis]. In: Rambaldi DM, Oliveira DAS (eds) Fragmentação de Ecossistemas: causas, efeitos sobre a biodiversidade e recomendações de políticas públicas. [Ecosystem Fragmentation: causes, effects on biodiversity and recommendations for public policies]. Ministério do Meio Ambiente/Secretaria Nacional de Biodiversidade e Florestas, Brasília, pp 318–324
Crooks KR (2002) Relative sensitivities of mammalian carnivores to habitat fragmentation. Conserv Biol 16:1–15
De Pablo CL, Roldán-Martín MJ, Martín de Agar P (2012) Magnitude and significance in landscape change. Landsc Res. doi:10.1080/01426397.2011.641949
Forman RTT (1995) Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Fortin MJ, Olson RJ, Ferson S, Iverson L, Hunsaker C, Edwards G, Levine D, Butera K, Klemas V (2000) Issues related to the detection of boundaries. Landscape Ecol 15:453–466
Franklin JF (1993) Preserving biodiversity: species, ecosystems, or landscapes? Ecol Appl 3(2):202–205
Gustafson EJ (1998) Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is the state of the art? Ecosystems 1:143–156
Hanski I (2001) Population dynamic consequences of dispersal in local population and in metapopulations. In: Danchin JC, Dhondt AA, Nichols JD (eds) Dispersal. Oxford University press, Oxford, pp 283–298
Hardt E (2010) Conservação ambiental em cenários de uso: medidas de mudanças, heterogeneidade e valoração da paisagem (Environmental conservation in land use scenarios: measurements of changes, heterogeneity and landscape valuation). PhD Thesis, State University of Campinas. http://cutter.unicamp.br/document/?code=000772667
Hardt E, Santos RF, Pereira-Silva EFL (2012) Landscape changes in Serra do Japi: legal protection or scientific expectation? Bosque 33(3):339–344
Hardt E, Pereira-Silva EFL, dos Santos RF, Tamashiro JY, Ragazzi S, Lins DBS (2013) Influence of natural and anthropogenic matrix on edge effect. Landsc Urban Plan (under review)
Hawbaker TJ, Radeloff VC, Clayton MK, Hammer RB, Gonzalez-Abraham CE (2006) Road development, housing growth, and landscape fragmentation in northern wisconsin: 1937–1999. Ecol Appl 16(3):1222–1237
Hersperger AM (2006) Spatial adjacencies and interactions: neighborhood mosaics for landscape ecological planning. Landsc Urban Plan 77:227–239
Hill MO, Gauch HG (1980) Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique. Vegetation 42:47–58
Kent M (2007) Biogeography and landscape ecology. Prog Phys Geog 31(3):345–355
Kepner W, Watts C, Edmonds C, Maingi J, Marsh S, Luna G (2000) Landscape approach for detecting and evaluating change in a semiarid environment. Environ Monit Assess 64:179–195
Kuussaari M, Bommarco R, Heikkinen RK, Helm A, Krauss J, Lindborg R, Ockinger E, Pärtel M, Pino J, Rodà F, Stefanescu C, Teder T, Zobel M, Steffan-Dewenter I (2009) Extinction debt: a challenge for biodiversity conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 24(10):564–571
Landeiro VM, Bini LM, Costa FRC, Franklin E, Nogueira A, Souza JLP, Moraes J, Magnusson WE (2012) How far can we go in simplifying biomonitoring assessments? An integrated analysis of taxonomic surrogacy, taxonomic sufficiency and numerical resolution in a megadiverse region. Ecol Ind 23:366–373
Lindenmayer DB, Fischer J (2006) Habitat fragmentation and landscape change: an ecological and conservation synthesis. Island Press, Washington
Lovett GM, Jones CG, Turner MG, Weathers KC (eds) (2005) Ecosystem function in heterogeneous landscapes. Springer, New York, pp 1–30
Margalef R (1963) On certain unifying principles in ecology. Am Nat 897:357–374
Margalef R (1979) The organization of space. Oikos 33:152–159
Margalef R (1996) Information and uncertainty in living systems, a view from ecology. Biosystems 38:141–146
McGarigal K, Cushman SA (2005) The gradient concept of landscape structure. In: Wiens J, Moss M (eds) Issues and perspectives in landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 112–119
Metzger JP (2004) Estrutura da paisagem: o uso adequado de métricas. In: Cullen JrL, Rudran R, Valladares-pádua C (eds) Métodos de estudo em biologia da conservação e manejo da vida silvestre. Ed. da UFPR e Fundação O Boticário de Proteção à Natureza, Curitiba, pp 423–453
Metzger JP, Décamps H (1997) The structural connectivity threshold: an hypothesis in conservation biology at the landscape scale. Acta Oecol 18:1–12
Metzger JP, Muller E (1996) Characterizing the complexity of landscape boundaries. Landscape Ecol 11:65–77
Noss RF (1983) A regional landscape approach to maintain diversity. BioScience 33:700–706
Pardini R, Faria D, Accacio GM, Laps RR, Mariano-Neto E, Paciencia MLB, Dixo MLB, Baumgarten J (2009) The challenge of maintaining Atlantic forest biodiversity: a multi-taxa conservation assessment of specialist and generalist species in an agro-forestry mosaic in Southern Bahia. Biol Conserv 142:1178–1190
Pardini R, Souza SM, Braga-Neto R, Metzger JP (2005) The role of forest structure, fragment size and corridors in maintaining small mammal abundance and diversity in an Atlantic forest landscape. Biol Conserv 124:253–266
Pires AS, Lira PK, Fernández FAS, Schitini GM, Oliveira CO (2002) Frequency of movements of small mammals among Atlantic Coastal Forest fragments in Brazil. Biol Conserv 108(2):229–237
Pulliam HR (1988) Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am Nat 132:652–661
Rescia AJ, Schmitz MF, Martín de Agar MP, De Pablo CL, Atauri JA, Pineda FD (1994) Influence of landscape complexity and land management on wood plant diversity in northern Spain. J Veg Sci 5:505–516
Rescia AJ, Schmitz MF, Martín de Agar MP, De Pablo CL, Pineda FD (1995) Ascribing plant diversity values to historical changes in landscape: a methodological approach. Landsc Urban Plan 31:181–194
Roldán-Martín MJ, De Pablo CTL, Martín de Agar P (2003) Landscape mosaics recognition and changes over time: a methodological approach. In: Mander U, Antrop M (eds) Multifunctional landscapes: continuity and change. Wit Press, Boston, pp 55–77
Roldán-Martín MJ, De Pablo CTL, Martín de Agar P (2006) Landscape changes over time: comparison of land uses, boundaries and mosaics. Landscape Ecol 21:1075–1088
Schröder B, Seppelt R (2006) Analysis of pattern-process interactions based on landscape models—overview, general concepts, and methodological issues. Ecol Model 199:505–516
Turner MG, Cardille JA (2007) Spatial heterogeneity and ecosystem processes. In: WU J, Hobbs RJ (eds) Key topics in landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 62–77
Turner MG, Chapin FI (2005) Causes and consequences of spatial heterogeneity in ecosystem function. In: Lovett G, Jones C, Turner M, Weathers K (eds) Ecosystem function in heterogeneous landscapes. Springer, New York, pp 9–30
Turner MG, Corlett RT (1996) The conservation value of small isolated fragments of lowland tropical rain forest. Trends Ecol Evol 11:330–333
Valverde V, Roldán-Martín MJ, Campos GA, Pérez P, Martín de Agar P, De Pablo CTL (2008) Análisis de la estructura espacial del paisaje: mosaicos del paisaje. In: Maestre FT, Escudero A, Bonet A (eds) Introducción al análisis espacial de datos en ecología y ciencias ambientales: métodos y aplicaciones. Dykinson, Madrid, pp 747–759
Van Apeldoorn RC, Oostenbrink WT, Van Winden A, Van Der Zee FF (1992) Effects of habitat fragmentation on the bank vole, Clethrionomys glareolus, in an agricultural landscape. Oikos 65:265–274
Van Leeuwen CG (1966) A relational theoretical approach to pattern and processes in vegetation. Wentia 15:25–46
Wiens JA (1995) Landscape mosaics and ecological theory. In: Hansson L, Fahrig L, Merrial G (eds) Mosaics landscapes and ecological processes. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 1–26
Wiens JA (1999) The science and practice landscape ecology. In: Klopatek JM, Gardner RH (eds) Landscape ecological analysis: issues and applications. Springer, New York, pp 371–383
Wiens JA (2005) Toward a unified landscape ecology. In: Wiens J, Moss M (eds) Issues and perspectives in landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 365–373
Wiens JA, Crawford CS, Gosz JR (1985) Boundary dynamics: a conceptual framework for studying landscape ecosystems. Oikos 45(3):421–427
Zebisch M, Weschsung F, Kenneweg H (2004) Landscape response functions for biodiversity—assessing the impact of land-use changes at the county level. Landsc Urban Plan 67:157–172
Zeng H, Ben WuX (2005) Utilities of edge-based metrics for studying landscape fragmentation. Comput Environ Urban 29:159–178
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge support received from FAPESP (São Paulo State Foundation for Science Funding) through a PhD scholarship (process number 06/55385-0) and financial support (process number 08/01505-0). We also acknowledge the comments of two anonymous referees and Dra. L.A. Schulte, who helped us improve the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hardt, E., dos Santos, R.F., de Pablo, C.L. et al. Utility of landscape mosaics and boundaries in forest conservation decision making in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Landscape Ecol 28, 385–399 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9845-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9845-5