Skip to main content
Log in

On Rational Beliefs in Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy: A Theoretical Perspective

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a number of theoretical issues concerning rational beliefs in REBT will be discussed. In particular, a distinction will be made between rational beliefs which appear rational but are only partially rational (called here, partially formed rational beliefs) and rational beliefs that are fully rational (called here, fully formed rational beliefs). Making this distinction has a number of benefits. For example, it helps explain how people transform their partially formed rational beliefs into irrational beliefs and it provides authors of counseling and psychotherapy textbooks with clear, accurate information to pass on to their readership (Dryden 2012). A number of other issues concerning rational beliefs will also be discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. I will discuss this concept of transformation later in the paper.

  2. I will discuss the issue of the strength of partially formed rational beliefs and the transformation process later in the paper.

  3. I have included here what I have called the struggle component to combat the view that a discomfort tolerance belief implies that it is or should be easy to tolerate adversity.

  4. I have included this evaluation of “it” (an aspect of the person or an actual inferred event) as part of a fully formed unconditional positive self-rating statement to stress that negative evaluations of such aspects are realistic and healthy.

  5. See note 4.

  6. While escalators go up, the bottom of the escalator is on the same continuum as the top of the escalator.

  7. In its short form: “I must pass my forthcoming exam.”

References

  • Dryden, W. (2009). Rational emotive behavior therapy: Distinctive features. Hove, East Sussex: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryden, W. (2012). The ABCs of REBT revisited: Perspectives on conceptualization. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1994). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy: A comprehensive method of treating human disturbance. Revised and updated. New York: Birch Lane Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neenan, M., & Dryden, W. (1999). Rational emotive behaviour therapy: Advances in theory and practice. London: Whurr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yankura, J., & Dryden, W. (1990). Doing RET: Albert Ellis in action. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Windy Dryden.

Additional information

An earlier version of this article was published in: Neenan and Dryden (1999).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dryden, W. On Rational Beliefs in Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy: A Theoretical Perspective. J Rat-Emo Cognitive-Behav Ther 31, 39–48 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-012-0158-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-012-0158-4

Keywords

Navigation