Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

‘A Speculative Idea’: The Parallel Trajectories of Financial Speculation, Obstetrical Science, and Fiscal Management of Female Bodies in Henry James’s Washington Square

  • Published:
Journal of Medical Humanities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay teases out the intimate connections between the scientific and fiscal realms in the context of American germ theory and obstetrics. By uncovering the economic and medical contexts of Henry James’s Washington Square—set during the infancy of germ theory and the heyday of American obstetrics—this essay exposes a previously unexplored subtextual history of contagion in the text. Although this scientific history seems relegated to the novel’s margins, understanding the changing scientific cosmologies and professional organizations in the context of the novel’s setting and composition reveals that these tiny infectious particles and their vectors fundamentally shape the plot of the novel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell, Ian F. A. 1993. Washington Square: Styles of Money. Woodbridge: Twayne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmar, Betsy. 1988, “Rewalking the ‘Walking City’: Housing and Property Relations in New York City, 1780–1840.” In Material Life in America, 1600–1860, edited by Robert Blair St. George, 371–84. Boston: Northeastern UP.

  • Bochner, Salomon. 1966. The Role of Mathematics in the Rise of Science. Princeton: Princeton UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodsky, Phyllis L. 2008. The Control of Childbirth: Women Versus Medicine Through the Ages. Jefferson: McFarland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bynum, W. F. 1994. Science and the Practice of Medicine in The Nineteenth-Century. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye, Nancy Schrom. 1986, “The Medicalization of Birth.” In The American Way of Birth, edited by Pamela S. Eakins, 21–46. Philadelphia: Temple UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eakins, Pamela S. 1986, “The Medicalization of Birth.” In The American Way of Birth, edited by Pamela S. Eakins, 17–20. Philadelphia: Temple UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grattan-Guinness, Ivor. 1998, The Norton History of the Mathematical Sciences: The Rainbow of Mathematics. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, Henry. 2002. Washington Square. New York: The Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leavitt, Judith Walzer. 1986. Brought to Bed: Childbearing in America 1750 to 1950. New York: Oxford UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Emily. 2001. The Woman In the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelson, Karen L. 1988. Childbirth in America: Anthropological Perspectives. South Hadley: Bergin & Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooks, Judith Pence. 1997. Midwifery and Childbirth in America. Philadelphia: Temple UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, Barbara Katz. 1982. In Labor: Women and Power in the Birthplace. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheiber, Andrew. 1996. “The Doctor’s Order: Eugenic Anxiety in Henry James’s Washington Square.” Literature and Medicine 15.2: 244–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semmelweis, Ignaz. 1983. The Etiology, Concept and Prophylaxis of Childbed Fever. Translated by K. Codell Carter. Madison: Wisconsin UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorter, Edward. 1982. A History of Women’s Bodies. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertz, Richard W. and Dorothy C. Wertz. 1989. Lying-In: A History of Childbirth in America. Expanded ed. New Haven: Yale UP.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kari Nixon.

Additional information

1It is pertinent to note that an increasing number of medical curricula no longer utilize cadavers or even body parts but computer simulations and models. While this is a highly controversial trend within medical education, it demonstrates that some educators are not convinced that the teaching and learning of anatomy requires the observation of, let alone the dissection of, “real” bodies.

2We are grateful to an anonymous reviewer for pressing this point.

3Although Kristeva (1982) claims cadavers to be the ultimate in abjection, she was writing in a time before public display of plastinated cadavers and makes no claims about the latter in particular. Nevertheless, as discussed, others have applied her ideas to plastinates (Kuppers 2004; Muller 2006; Scott 2008; Stern 2006; Lizama 2009; Ruchti 2009, 189; Lewis 2007).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nixon, K. ‘A Speculative Idea’: The Parallel Trajectories of Financial Speculation, Obstetrical Science, and Fiscal Management of Female Bodies in Henry James’s Washington Square . J Med Humanit 38, 231–247 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-014-9302-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-014-9302-8

Keywords

Navigation