Skip to main content
Log in

Economic Patriotism, the Clash of Capitalisms, and State Aid in the European Union

  • Published:
Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article analyses the political economy of state aid in the European Union (EU) using the concepts of economic patriotism and models of capitalism. State aid is analysed as a form of economic patriotism, which is conceived here as economic interventions which seek, by a number of means, to advance the perceived economic self-interest of particular groups and actors (firms, workforces, or sectors) defined according to their territorial status. The article argues that the paradox of neo-liberal democracy generated by liberal international markets, overlapping economic governance regimes (such as the EU and the World Trade Organisation), and nationally delimited political mandates presents new problems for policy-makers attempting economic interventions like state aid. Forms of economic patriotism are partly shaped by national institutional and social configurations and state traditions. Within EU economic governance, this generates a ‘clash of capitalisms’ whereby liberal EU anti-trust and competition policy norms proscribe certain state aid and industrial policy measures favoured by some European states. As traditional industrial policy becomes decreasingly viable, new modes of economic patriotic interventionism are enacted within contemporary processes of market-making, and the re-regulatory activity framing European markets. The paper focuses on French state aid responses to the global economic crisis, noting how the retreat of neo-liberal ebullience within the EU provides a conducive environment for resurgent French dirigiste approaches to state aid, indicating that the politics of economic patriotism and state aid will continue to be important features of the European political economic landscape in the years ahead.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The concept of “economic patriotism”, as deployed here, was developed jointly by the author and Cornelia Woll in the context of the Warwick/Sciences Po Paris “Economic Patriotism: The Limits of the Liberal Market” Project which we co-organise. Findings from the project were published in Economic patriotism: political intervention in open economies”, a special issue of the Journal of European Public Policy, (Clift and Woll 2012).

  2. Dominique de Villepin argued against a possible hostile take-over of the French company Danone by PepsiCo on 27 July 2005. The notion had previously been employed in France but became central to national and international debates in the aftermath of de Villepin’s speech. See Christophe Jakubyszyn, “Dominique de Villepin en appelle au patriotisme économique,” Le Monde, 29 July 2005.

  3. I owe this expression to Colin Crouch and would like to thank him for a very helpful discussion of these points.

  4. Traditions of state direction of, and intervention in, economic activity in France have a long heritage, traceable at least as far back as Jean-Baptiste Colbert, minister under Louis XIV between 1661 and 1683. Colbert’s bent for state interventionism in economic affairs reached a zenith when, in 1666, he issued a règlement to the effect that the fabrics of Dijon and Selangey were to contain 1,408 threads (no more, no less), and those of Auxerre and Avalon 1, 376 (Heilbroner 1992: 24)

  5. This discussion draws on the paper “Economic Patriotism and National Traditions of Economic Thought”, presented by Matthew Watson at the economic patriotism workshop at the University of Warwick, February 2008.

  6. The “little republics” quote is from Hunt 1936: 135).

  7. http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/09/332

  8. “L’Etat débloque 7,8 milliards d’euros pour le secteur automobile”, Le Monde, 09.02.09

  9. “Brussels blocks French bank bail-out” Financial Times 28-Nov-2008

References

  • Albert M (1991) Capitalisme contre capitalisme. Editions de Seuil, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcouffe C (2000) Judges and CEOs: French aspects of corporate governance. Eur J Law Econ 9:134–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard O-J, Muet P-A (1993) Competitiveness through disinflation: an assessment of french macro-economic strategy. Econ Policy 16:12–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Cafruny AW, Ryner M (eds) (2003) A ruined fortress? Neoliberal hegemony and transformation in Europe. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham

    Google Scholar 

  • Cafruny AW, Ryner M (2007) Europe at bay: in the shadow of US hegemony. Lynne Rienner, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan H, Hoepner M (2005) European integration and the clash of capitalisms: political cleavages of takeover liberalisation. Comp Eur Polit 3:307–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cioffi J (2000) Governing globalization? The state, law, and structural change in corporate governance. J Law Soc 27:572–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clift B (2003) The changing political economy of france: dirigisme under duress. In: Cafruny A, Ryner M (eds) A ruined fortress? Neo-liberal hegemony and transformation in Europe. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, pp 173–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Clift B (2004) The French model of capitalism: still exceptional? In: Where are national capitalisms now? Palgrave, Basingstoke, pp 91–110

  • Clift B (2007) French corporate governance in the new global economy: mechanisms of change and hybridisation within models of capitalism. Polit Stud 55:546–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clift B (2008) Economic policy. In: Cole A, Le Gales P, Levy J (eds) Developments in French politics 4. Palgrave, Basingstoke, pp 191–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Clift B (2009) Second time as farce? The EU takeover directive, the clash of capitalisms and the hamstrung harmonisation of European (and French) corporate governance. J Common Mark Stud 47:55–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clift B, Woll C (2009) Economic patriotism: the clash between political and economic boundaries. Paper prepared for the Warwick/Sciences Po Paris Economic Patriotism: The Limits of the Liberal Market’ Project Workshop, Paris, June 18–19th

  • Clift B, Woll C (2012) Economic patriotism: re-inventing control over open markets. J Eur Public Policy 19:307–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen E (1996) La tentation hexagonale. Fayard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen E (2007) Industrial policies in France: the old and the new. J Ind Compet Trade 7:213–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa O, de Maillard J, Smith A (2007) Vin et politique: Bordeaux, la France, la mondialisation. Presses de Sciences Po, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch C, Legalès P (2009) Cities as national champions. Paper prepared for the Warwick/Sciences Po Paris Economic Patriotism: The Limits of the Liberal Market’ Project Workshop, Paris, June 18–19th

  • Crouch C, Streeck W (eds) (1997) The political economy of modern capitalism. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Deeg R, Jackson G (2007) Towards a more dynamic Theory of Capitalist Variety. Socio-Econ Rev 5:149–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denord F (2007) Néolibéralisme version français. Editions Demopolis, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudouet F-X, Grémont E (2010) Les grands patrons en France: du capitalisme d’état à la financiarisation. Editions lignes de repères, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist Intelligence Unit (2010) Industry report: financial services: France. Economist Intelligence Unit, London

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2007) Commission Staff Working Document: Report on the implementation of the Directive on Takeover Bids. http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/company/docs/takeoverbids/2007-02-report_en.pdf

  • Gamble A, Kelly G (2000) The politics of the company. In: Parkinson J, Kelly G, Gamble A (eds) The political economy of the company. Hart, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble A (2006) The European Disunion. Br J Polit Int Relat 8:34–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George S (1996) The European Union, 1992 and the fear of ‘fortress Europe’. In: Gamble A, Payne A (eds) Regionalism and world order. Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 21–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Grignon F (2004) Sénat rapport d’information fait au nom de la commission des Affaires économiques et du Plan (1) par le groupe de travail (2) sur la delocalisation des industries de main d’œuvre. No. 374, 23 June, La documentation française, Paris

  • Guyomarch A, Machin H, Ritchie E (1998) France in the European Union. Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall P, Soskice D (2001) An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In: Hall P, Soskice D (eds) Varieties of capitalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–70

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hannah L (1983) The rise of the corporate economy. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardie I, Howarth D (2009) “Die Krise” but not “La Crise”? The financial crisis and the transformation of German and French banking systems. J Common Mark Stud 47:1017–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward J (1986) The state and the market economy: industrial patriotism and economic intervention in France. Wheatsheaf Books

  • Hayward J (1995) Introduction: Europe’s endangered industrial champions. In: Hayward J (ed) Industrial enterprise and European integration. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward J (1997) Changing partnerships: firms and the French state. Mod Contemp Fr 5:155–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilbroner R (1992) The worldly philosophers. Touchstone, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Helleiner E (2002) Economic nationalism as a challenge to economic liberalism? Lesson from the 19th century. Int Stud Q 46:307–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoepner M, Shafer A (2007) A new phase of European integration: organized capitalisms in post-Ricardian Europe. MPIfG Discussion Paper 7/4. Max Planck Institute, Cologne

  • Hooghe L, Marks G (1999) The making of a polity: the struggle over European integration. In: Kitschelt H et al (eds) Continuity and change in contemporary capitalism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 70–97

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Höpner M (2006) Determinanten der Quersubventionierung. Ein Vorschlag zur Analyse wirtschaftlicher Liberalisierung. Berl J Soziol 16:7–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell C (2009) The transformation of French industrial relations: labor representation and the state in a post-Dirigiste era. Polit Soc 37:229–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt BC (1936) The development of the business corporation in England, 1800–1867. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jabko N (2006) Playing the market: a political strategy for uniting Europe, 1985–2005. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson G (2001) The origins of nonliberal corporate governance in Germany and Japan. In: Streeck W, Yamamura K (eds) The origins of nonliberal capitalism: Germany and Japan. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 121–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassim H (1997) French autonomy and the European Union. Mod Contemp Fr 5:167–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly D, Kelly G, Gamble A (eds) (1997) Stakeholder capitalism. Palgrave, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmbruch G (2001) The institutional embedding of market economies: the German “model” and its impact on Japan. In: Streeck W, Yamamura K (eds) The origins of nonliberal capitalism: Germany and Japan. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 39–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy J (1999) Toqueville’s revenge: state society and economy in contemporary France. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy J (2006) The state after statism: from market direction to market support. In: Levy J (ed) The state after statism. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Lordon F (1998) The logic and limits of désinflation competitive. Oxford Rev Econ Policy 14:96–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons B, Zhu M (2013) Compensating competitors or restoring competition? EC regulation of state aid for banks during the crisis. J Ind Compet Trade

  • Marquand D (1988) The unprincipled society. Fontana Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Massoc E, Jabko N (2010) La France Face A La Crise Bancaire De 2008: Les Limites D’une Rupture. Unpublished manuscript, currently under review at Revue Française de Sciences Politique

  • Morin F (1998) Le modèle française de détention et de gestion du capital: analyse, prospective et comparaisons internationales. Editions de Bercy, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin F (2000) A transformation in the French model of shareholding and management. Econ Soc 29:36–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolino M, Scarpa C, Valbonesi P (2013) Aiding car producers in the EU: money in search of a strategy. J Ind Compet Trade

  • OECD (2008) Competitive cities. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • OFCE (2006) L’économie française 2007. La découverte, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • OFCE (2009) Merites et limites du Pacte automobile. Lettre de l’OFCE 308

  • Rosamond B (2002) Imagining the European economy: ‘competitiveness’ and the social construction of ‘Europe’ as an economic space. New Polit Econ 7:157–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roustan M (2004) Assemblée nationale rapport d’information fait au nom de la délégation a l’aménagement et au développement durable au territoire sur la désindustrialisation du territoire. No. 1625, 27 May, La documentation française, Paris

  • Sarkozy N (2007) Ensemble tout devient possible. Presidential Election Manifesto

  • Schmidt V (1996) From state to market? The transformation of French business and government. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt V (1997) Running on empty: the end of dirigisme in French economic leadership. Mod Contemp Fr 5:229–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt V (2003) French capitalism transformed, yet still a third variety of capitalism. Econ Soc 32:526–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shonfield A (1969) Modern capitalism: the changing balance of public and private power. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Suleiman E (1978) Elites in French society: the politics of survival. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Tivey LJ (1978) The politics of the firm. St. Martin’s Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Viénot M (1995) Rapport sur le conseil d’administration des sociétés cotées. Rev Droit Aff Int 8:933–945

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitols S (2001) Varieties of corporate governance: comparing Germany and the UK. In: Hall P, Soskice D (eds) Varieties of capitalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 337–360

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Woo-Cummings M (1999) Introduction: Chalmers Johnson and the politics of nationalism and development. In: Woo-Cumings M (ed) The developmental state. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 235–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright V (1997) Introduction: la finance du dirigisme? Mod Contemp Fr 5:151–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zysman J (1983) Government, markets, growth: financial systems and the politics of industrial change. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ben Clift.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clift, B. Economic Patriotism, the Clash of Capitalisms, and State Aid in the European Union. J Ind Compet Trade 13, 101–117 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-012-0138-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-012-0138-5

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation