Abstract
In a recent article in this journal, Giuseppe Ferraro mounted a sustained attack on the semantic interpretation of the Madhyamaka doctrine of emptiness, an interpretation that has been championed by the authors. The present paper is their reply to that attack.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cowherds. (2011). Moonshadows: Conventional truth in Buddhist philosophy. New York: Oxford UP.
Deguchi, Y., Garfield, J. L., & Priest, G. (2008). The way of the dialetheist: Contradictions in Buddhism. Philosophy East and West, 58(3), 395–402.
Ferraro, G. (2013). A criticism of M. Siderits and J. L. Garfield’s ‘Semantic interpretation’ of Nāgārjuna’s theory of two truths. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 41, 195–219.
Garfield, J. L. (1990). Epochē and Śūnyatā: Skepticism east and west. Philosophy East and West, 40, 285–307.
Garfield, J. L. (1995). Fundamental wisdom of the middle way: Nāgārjuna’s Mūlamadhyamakakārikā. New York: Oxford UP.
Garfield, J. L. (1996). Emptiness and positionlessness: Do the Madhyamika relinquish all views? Journal of Indian Philosophy and Religion, 1, 1–34.
Garfield, J. L. (2002). Nāgārjuna and the limits of thought. New York: Oxford UP.
Garfield, J. L. (2008). Turning a Madhyamaka trick: Reply to Huntington. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 36, 428–449.
Priest, G. (2009). The structure of emptiness. Philosophy East and West, 59, 467–480.
Siderits, M. (2003). The soteriological significance of emptiness. Contemporary Buddhism, 4, 9–23.
Siderits, M., & Katsura, S. (2013). Nāgārjuna’s middle way. Boston: Wisdom.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Siderits, M., Garfield, J.L. Defending the Semantic Interpretation: A Reply to Ferraro. J Indian Philos 41, 655–664 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-013-9195-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-013-9195-2