Skip to main content
Log in

“The Theory was Beautiful Indeed”: Rise, Fall and Circulation of Maximizing Methods in Population Genetics (1930–1980)

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Describing the theoretical population geneticists of the 1960s, Joseph Felsenstein reminisced: “our central obsession was finding out what function evolution would try to maximize. Population geneticists used to think, following Sewall Wright, that mean relative fitness, W, would be maximized by natural selection” (Felsenstein 2000). The present paper describes the genesis, diffusion and fall of this “obsession”, by giving a biography of the mean fitness function in population genetics. This modeling method devised by Sewall Wright in the 1930s found its heyday in the late 1950s and early 1960s, in the wake of Motoo Kimura’s and Richard Lewontin’s works. It seemed a reliable guide in the mathematical study of deterministic effects (the study of natural selection in populations of infinite size, with no drift), leading to powerful generalizations presenting law-like properties. Progress in population genetics theory, it then seemed, would come from the application of this method to the study of systems with several genes. This ambition came to a halt in the context of the influential objections made by the Australian mathematician Patrick Moran in 1963. These objections triggered a controversy between mathematically- and biologically-inclined geneticists, with affected both the formal standards and the aims of population genetics as a science. Over the course of the 1960s, the mean fitness method withered with the ambition of developing the deterministic theory. The mathematical theory became increasingly complex. Kimura re-focused his modeling work on the theory of random processes; as a result of his computer simulations, Lewontin became the staunchest critic of maximizing principles in evolutionary biology. The mean fitness method then migrated to other research areas, being refashioned and used in evolutionary quantitative genetics and behavioral ecology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akin, E. 1979. The Geometry of Population Genetics. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, 31. Berlin: Springer.

  • Bodmer, W. 2009. “Sam Karlin: A Personal Appreciation.” Theoretical Population Biology 75(4): 230–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodmer, W. F. and Parsons, P. A. 1962. “Linkage and Recombination in Evolution.” E.W. Caspari and J.M. Thoday (eds.), Advances in Genetics, 11. London: Academic Press.

  • Crow, J.F. 1975. “Books Reviews: The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change.” American Journal of Human Genetics 27(2): 249–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow, J.F. 1969. “The Fundamental Theorem of Natural Selection – Reconsidered”. Proceedings of the 18th annual National Poultry Breeders Association, 45–63, Kansas City: Poultry Breeders of America.

  • Depew, D. 2013. “Conceptual Change and the Rhetoric of Evolutionary Theory: ‘Force Talk’as a Case Study and Challenge for Science Pedagogy.” K. Kampourakis (ed.), The Philosophy of Biology: A Companion for Educators. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 121–144.

  • Dietrich, M.R. 1994. “The Origins of the Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution.” Journal of the History of Biology 27(1): 21–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, M.R. 1996. “Monte Carlo Experiments and the Defense of Diffusion Models in Molecular Population Genetics.” Biology and Philosophy 11(3): 339–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, M.R. and Skipper, Jr., R.A. 2012. “A Shifting Terrain: A Brief History of the Adaptive Landscape.” E. Svensson and R. Calsbeek (eds.), The Adaptive Landscape in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A.W.F. 1974. “On Kimura’s Maximum Principle in the Genetical Theory of Natural Selection.” Advances in Applied Probability 6(1): 10–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A.W.F. 1994. “The Fundamental Theorem of Natural Selection.” Biological Reviews 69(4): 443–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A.W.F. 2000a. [1st edition 1978]. Foundations of Mathematical genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Edwards, A.W.F. 2000b. “Sewall Wright’s Equation Δq = (q (1 − q)∂ w/∂ q)/2w.” Theoretical Population Biology 57(1): 67–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A.W.F. 2014. “R.A. Fisher’s Gene-Centred View of Evolution and the Fundamental Theorem of Natural Selection.” Biological Reviews 89(1): 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewens, W. 1985. “The Path to the Genetics Sampling Formula.” J. Gani (ed.), The Craft of Probabilistic Modelling. A Collection of Personal Accounts. New York: Springer, pp. 276–290.

  • Ewens, W.J. 2009. “Sam Karlin and the Stochastic Theory of Evolutionary Population Genetics.” Theoretical Population Biology 75(4): 236–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. 2009. “Sam Karlin and Multi-locus Population Genetics.” Theoretical Population Biology 75(4): 233–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J. 1977. “Population Genetics and Ecology by Samuel Karlin and Eviatar Nevo.” Evolution 31(4): 918–919.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J. 1989. “Mathematics vs. Evolution.” Science 246(4932): 941–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J. 2000. “From Population Genetics to Evolutionary Genetics: A View Through the Trees.” R. Singh and C.B. Krimbas (eds.), Evolutionary Genetics: From Molecules to Morphology. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, pp. 609–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.A. 1918. “The Correlation Between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance.” Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 52(2): 399–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.A. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. London: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.A. 1935. “On the Selective Consequences of East’s (1927) Theory of Heterostylism in Lythrum.” Journal of Genetics 30(3): 369–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, I. and Lewontin, R.C. 1970. “Is the Gene the Unit of Selection?’ Genetics 65(4): 707–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gayon, J. 1995. “Sélection naturelle ou survie des plus aptes? Éléments pour une histoire du concept de fitness dans la théorie évolutionniste.” C. Blanckaert, J.-L. Fisher, and R. Rey (eds.), Nature Histoire, Société, Hommage à Jacques Roger. Paris: Klincksieck, pp. 263–287.

  • Geiringer, H. 1944. “On the Probability Theory of Linkage in Mendelian Heredity.” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 15(1): 25–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. and Lewontin, R.C. 1979. “The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 205(1161): 581–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P.H. 1989. “Patrick Alfred Pierce Moran 1917–1988.” Biometrics 45(2): 687–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W.D. 1964. “The Genetical Evolution of Social Behaviour.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 7: 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton W.D. 1996. Narrow Roads of Gene Land: the Collected papers of W.D. Hamilton, Vol. 1. Evolution of Social Behaviour. Oxford: W.H. Freeman/Spectrum.

  • Hodge, J. 2011. “Darwinism After Mendelism: The Case of Sewall Wright’s Intellectual Synthesis in His Shifting Balance Theory of Evolution (1931).” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42(1): 30–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, H.S. 1917. “The Numerical Results of Diverse Systems of Breeding, with Respect to Two Pairs of Characters, Linked or Independent, with Special Relation to the Effects of Linkage.” Genetics 2: 97–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, David. 2009. Drawing Theories Apart: The Dispersion of Feynman Diagrams in Postwar Physics. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlin, S. 1975. “General Two-Locus Selection Models: Some Objectives, Results and Interpretations.” Theoretical Population Biology 7(3): 364–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlin, S. and Feldman, M. 1970. “Linkage and Selection: Two Locus Symmetric Viability Model.” Theoretical Population Biology 1: 39–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, M. 1956. “A Model of a Genetic System Which Leads to Closer Linkage by Natural Selection.” Evolution 10(3): 278–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, M. 1958. “On the Change of Population Fitness by Natural Selection.” Heredity 12(2): 145–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, M. 1965. “Attainment of Quasi-Linkage Equilibrium when Gene Frequencies are Changing by Natural Selection.” Genetics 52: 875–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, M. 1981. “Possibility of Extensive Neutral Evolution Under Stabilizing Selection with Special Reference to Nonrandom Usage of Synonymous Codons.” Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of United States of America 78(9): 5773–5777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, Motoo. 1985. “Diffusion Models of Population Genetics in the Age of Molecular Biology.” D.G. Kendall and J. Gani (eds.), The Craft of Probabilistic Modelling: A Collection of Personal Accounts. New York: Springer, pp. 151–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingman, J.F.C. 1961. “A Mathematical Problem in Population Genetics.” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 57(3): 574–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kojima, K.I. 1959. “Role of Epistasis and Overdominance in Stability of Equilibria with Selection.” Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of United States of America 45(7): 984–989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kojima, K.I. and Kelleher, T.M. 1961. “Changes of Mean Fitness in Random Mating Populations when Epistasis and Linkage are Present.” Genetics 46(5): 527–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R. 1976. “Natural Selection and Random Genetic Drift in Phenotypic Evolution.” Evolution 30(2): 314–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R. 1979. “Quantitative Genetic Analysis of Multivariate Evolution, Applied to Brain: Body Size Allometry.” Evolution 33(1): 402–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R. and Arnold, S.J. 1983. “The Measurement of Selection on Correlated Characters.” Evolution 37(6): 1210–1226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, I.M. 1954. “The Genotype in Mendelian Populations.” G. Montalenti and A. Chiarugi (eds.), Proceedings of the IXth International Congress of Genetics. Firenze:The Congress, pp. 130–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, I.M. 1973. “The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics by William B. Provine.” Quarterly Review of Biology 48(2): 362–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. C. 1958. “A general method for investigating the equilibrium of gene frequency in a population.” Genetics 43(3): 419–434.

  • Lewontin, R. C. 1967a. “The genetics of complex systems.” L.M. Le Cam and J. Neyman (eds.), Proceedings of the Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Vol. 4. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 439–455.

  • Lewontin, R.C. 1967b. “Population Genetics.” Annual Review of Genetics 1(1): 37–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C. 1979. “Sociobiology as an Adaptationist Program.” Behavioral Science 24: 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C. 1982. “Keeping It Clean.” Nature 300: 113–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C. 1989. “This Week’s Citation Classic.” Current Contents 3: 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C. and Kojima, K.I. 1960. “The Evolutionary Dynamics of Complex Polymorphisms.” Evolution 14(4): 458–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C. and White, M.J.D. 1960. “Interaction Between Inversion Polymorphisms of Two Chromosome Pairs in the Grasshopper, Moraba scurra.” Evolution 14(1): 116–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C., Paul, D.B., Beatty, J. and Krimbas, C.B. 2001. “Interview of RC Lewontin.” R.S. Singh (ed.), Thinking About Evolution: Historical, Philosophical, and Political Perspectives. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, pp. 22–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, C.C. 1955a. Population Genetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, C.C. 1955b. “The Stability of an Equilibrium and the Average Fitness of a Population.” The American Naturalist 89(848): 281–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. 1994. “1992 Sewall Wright Award: Russell Lande.” The American Naturalist 144(1).

  • Mayr, E. 1959. “Where are We?’ Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 24: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. 1975. “Unity of Genotype.” Biologisches Zentralblatt 94: 377–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCandlish, D.M. and Stoltzfus, A. 2014. “Modeling Evolution Using the Probability of Fixation: History and Implications.” Quarterly Review of Biology 89(3): 225–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, P.A.P. 1962. The Statistical Processes of Evolutionary Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, P.A.P. 1963a. “On the Measurement of Natural Selection Dependent on Several Loci.” Evolution 17(2): 182–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, P.A.P. 1963b. “Balanced Polymorphisms with Unlinked Loci.” Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 16(1): 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, P.A.P. 1963c. “On the Nonexistence of Adaptive Topographies.” Annals of Human Genetics 27(4): 383–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukai, T., Watanabe, T.K. and Yamaguchi, O. 1974. “The Genetic Structure of Natural Populations of Drosophila melanogaster. XII. Linkage Disequilibrium in a Large Local Population.” Genetics 77(4): 771–793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagylaki, T. 1976. “The Evolution of One-and Two-Locus Systems.” Genetics 83(3): 583–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, J. R. 1994. “Molecular techniques in population genetics: A brief history.” B. Schierwater, B. Streit, G.P. Wagner and R. DeSalle (eds.), Molecular Ecology and Evolution: Approaches and Applications. Experientia Suppplementum 69. Basel: Springer Basel, AG, pp. 131–156.

  • Provine, W.B. 1989. Sewall Wright and Evolutionary Biology. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provine, W.B. 2001 [1971]. The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics: With a New Afterword. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Robbins, R.B. 1917. “Some Applications of Mathematics to Breeding Problems.” Genetics 2(5): 489–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, A. 1975. “Computer Simulation in Genetics by Jack. L. Crosby.” Heredity, 34(1): 139–141.

  • Schwartz, J. 2002. “Population Genetics and Sociobiology.” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 45(2): 224–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J. 2002. “Population Genetics and Sociobiology.” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 45(2): 224–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segerstrale, U. 2013. Nature's Oracle: A Life of W.D. Hamilton, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Turner, J.R.G. 1971. “Wright’s Adaptive Surface, and Some General Rules for Equilibria in Complex Polymorphisms.” The American Naturalist 105(943): 267–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G.C. 1966. Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought. Princeton:Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. 1930. “The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. A Review.” Journal of Heredity 21(8): 349–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. 1932. “The Roles of Mutation, Inbreeding, Crossbreeding and Selection in Evolution.” D.F. Jones (ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress on Genetics, Vol. 1(6). Ithaca, NY: Brooklyn Botanic Garden, pp. 356–366.

  • Wright, S. 1935a. “The Analysis of Variance and the Correlations Between Relatives with Respect to Deviations from an Optimum.” Journal of Genetics 30(2): 243–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. 1935b. “Evolution in Populations in Approximate Equilibrium.” Journal of Genetics 30(2): 257–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. 1937. “The Distribution of Gene Frequencies in Populations.” Genetics 23: 307–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. 1942. “Statistical Genetics and Evolution.” Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 48(4): 223–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. 1955. “Classification of the factors of evolution.” Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, Vol. 20. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, pp. 16–24.

  • Wright, S. 1962. “The Statistical Process of Evolutionary Theory by P.A.P. Moran.” American Scientist 50(4): 460A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. 1967. “‘Surfaces’ of Selective Values.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 58(1): 165–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright S. 1969. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations: A Treatise in Four Volumes. Vol. 2: The Theory of Genetic Frequencies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

  • Wright, S. 1978. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations: A Treatise in Four Volumes, 4 vols. Variability Within and Among Natural Populations. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Baptiste Grodwohl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grodwohl, JB. “The Theory was Beautiful Indeed”: Rise, Fall and Circulation of Maximizing Methods in Population Genetics (1930–1980). J Hist Biol 50, 571–608 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-016-9449-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-016-9449-4

Keywords

Navigation