Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Salt River Indian Reservation: land use conflicts and aspects of socioeconomic change on the outskirts of Metro-Phoenix, Arizona

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several North American metropolitan areas including Albuquerque, El Paso and Seattle in the U.S., and the Canadian urban areas of Montreal and Vancouver, are characterized by Indian reservations situated either within or on the outskirts of these cities. This type of Indian reservation or reserve within metropolitan areas has been the subject of limited geographical research, and is nowhere as manifest as in Metro-Phoenix. Three reservations obstruct the otherwise unlimited growth of Arizona’s capital. This phenomenon is most striking in the eastern regions of Phoenix where, until the end of the 1980s, the almost exclusively rural, agrarian Salt River Indian Reservation formed a physical and cultural barrier to urban development, preventing metropolitan sprawl beyond a clearly marked boundary. Continued urban pressures have led to changing land uses, effectively hollowing out this embankment or barrier, which has caused a profound change in the reservation. Both the Salt River and Gila River Indian reservations maintain large tracts of irrigated agricultural land, but the transformation that converted farms to suburbs off the reservation is now changing the reservation itself. In fact, this change actually began more than a hundred years ago with the Anglo-American colonization of what is today Arizona’s central region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Comeaux, M. (1991). Creating Indian lands: The boundary of the Salt River Indian community. Journal of Historical Geography, 17, 241–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezell, P. (1983). History of the Pima (Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 10) (pp. 149–160)Washington, DC.

  • Frantz, K. (1998). Die Indianerreservationen im Gila und Salt River Valley (Arizona). Landnutzungskonflikte und Aspekte des sozioökonomischen Wandels am Rande einer Großstadt. Österreich in Geschichte und Literatur (mit Geographie), 42, 217–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frantz, K. (1999). Indian reservations in the United States, territory, sovereignty, and socioeconomic change. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, M. (1896). Address given to the lake Mohonk conference of friends of the Indian. (Proceedings of the 14th annual meeting), Washington, DC.

  • Gregory, D., & McGuire, Th. (1980). Research design for the testing of interstate 10 corridor prehistoric and historic archaeological remains between interstate 17 and 30th drive. Tucson, Arizona. Arizona State Museum: Cultural Resource Management Section.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossmann, F. (1870). Report of the Agent of the Pima Agency. Annual Report of the Commissioner of Indian Affairs to the Secretary of the Interior. Washington, DC.

  • Hackenberg, R. (1983). Pima and Papago Ecological Adaptions (Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 10) (161–177) Washington, DC.

  • Hallock, D. (1987). The Pima road syndrom: Cultural perception as a factor in regional planning. Papers and Proceedings of Applied Geography Conferences, 10, 173–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmeister, B. (1980). Die Grenze von Indianerreservationen in den USA: Landschaftselement, rechtlicher Status, ökonomische Bedeutung, Veränderlichkeit. In H. Kishimoto (Ed.), Geographie und ihre Grenzen (pp. 69–80). Bern: Kümmerly and Frey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, T. (1988). Transportation in the phoenix metropolitan area. In Ch. Sargent (Ed.), Metro arizona. (p. 156f) Scottsdale.

  • Pablo, S. (1983). Contemporary Pima. (Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 10) (212–221) Washington, DC.

  • Presnell Association Inc. (1988). Salt river Pima–Maricopa Indian community, AZ–transportation plan. Arizona: Phoenix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salt River Pima–Maricopa Indian Community. (1988). General development plan. Arizona: Scottsdale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spier, L. (1933). Yuman tribes of the Gila river. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout, J. (1872). Report to General O.O. Howard of a Council Held by the chiefs and head-men of the Pima and Maricopa Indians at the U.S. Indian Agency, Gila bend reservation. Washington, DC: Annual Report of the Commissioner of Indian Affairs to the Secretary of the Interior.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of the Census (= USBC) (1962). Census 1960, Population (United States). Washington, DC.

  • U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs (1985). Annual Report of Indian Lands. Washington, DC.

  • U.S. House of Representatives (1988). Modifying a Portion of the South Boundary of the Salt River Pima–Maricopa Indian Reservation in Arizona, and for other Purposes. 100th Congress, 2nd Session (Report 100–921), Washington, DC.

  • USBC (1993a). Census 1990, Population (American Indian and Alaska Native Areas)—Social and Economic Characteristics (Sect. 1 and 2). Washington, DC.

  • USBC (1993b). Census 1990, Population (United States)—Social and Economic Characteristics (Sect. 1 and 2). Washington, DC.

  • USBC (1993c). Census 1990, Population (United States)—Selected Housing Characteristics (Sect. 1 and 2). Washington, DC.

  • USBC (2003). Census 2000, Population (United States). Washington, DC.

  • USBC–American FactFinder (2008a). Census 2000, Summary File 4, Table 3. United States—American Indian and Alaska Native Area, and Alaska Native Regional Corporation. Income and Poverty in 1999. Washington, DC.

  • USBC–American FactFinder (2008b). Census 2000, Summary File 4, Table 4. United States—Places and County Subdivisions with 50,000 or More Population. Income and Poverty in 1999. Washington, DC.

  • USBC–American FactFinder (2008c). Census 2000, Summary File 4, Table 1. United States—American Indian and Alaska Native Area, and Alaska Native Regional Corporation. Employment Status and Commuting to Work in 2000. Washington, DC.

  • USBC–American FactFinder (2008d). Census 2000, Summary File 4, Table 2. United States—Places and County Subdivisions with 50,000 or More Population. Employment Status and Commuting to Work in 2000. Washington, DC.

  • USBC–American FactFinder (2008e). Census 2000, Summary File 4, Table 6. United States—Places and County Subdivisions with 50,000 or More Population. Language, School Enrollment, and Educational Attainment in 2000. Washington, DC.

  • USBC–American FactFinder (2008f). Census 2000, Summary File 4, Table 5. United States—American Indian and Alaska Native Area, and Alaska Native Regional Corporation. Language, School Enrollment, and Educational Attainment in 2000. Washington, DC.

  • USBC–American FactFinder (2008g). Census 2000, Summary File 4, Table 9. United States—Places and County Subdivisions with 50,000 or More Population. Occupancy, Equipment, and Utilization Characteristics of Occupied Housing Units in 2000. Washington, DC.

  • USBC–American FactFinder (2008h). Census 2000, Summary File 4, Table 8. American Indian and Alaska Native Area, and Alaska Native Regional Corporation. Occupancy, Equipment, and Utilization Characteristics of Occupied Housing Units in 2000. Washington, DC.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, University of Innsbruck, Innrain 52, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria

    Klaus Frantz

Authors
  1. Klaus Frantz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaus Frantz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frantz, K. The Salt River Indian Reservation: land use conflicts and aspects of socioeconomic change on the outskirts of Metro-Phoenix, Arizona. GeoJournal 77, 777–790 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-010-9375-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-010-9375-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation