Abstract
This commentary on Nescolarde-Selva and Usó-Doménech (Found Sci, 2013) raises questions about the dynamic versus static nature of the model proposed, and in addition asks whether the model might be used to explain ethical flexibility and rigidity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gash, H. (2009). Attitude change, stereotypes and tolerance. In G. E. Lasker & K. Hiwaki (Eds.), Personal and spiritual development in the world of cultural diversity (Vol. VI, pp. 13–20). Tecumseh: International Institute for Advanced Studies in Systems Research and Cybernetics.
Gopnik, A., Glymour, C., Sobel, D., Schulz, L., Kushnir, T., & Danks, D. (2004). A theory of causal learning in children: Causal maps and Bayes nets. Psychological Review, 111(1), 1–31.
Nescolarde-Selva, J. A., & Usó-Doménech, J. (2013). Semiotic vision of ideologies. Foundations of Science. doi:10.1007/s10699-013-9329-8.
Welzel, C. (2010). How selfish are self-expression values: A civicness test. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41, 152–174.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gash, H. Fixed or Probable Ideas?. Found Sci 19, 283–284 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-013-9330-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-013-9330-2