Skip to main content
Log in

What is the mole?

  • Published:
Foundations of Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mole is a difficult concept. Surveys have shown that even many teachers do not have a proper understanding of it. To help to meet this problem, the SI/IUPAC formulation of the mole is carefully presented and explained. New SI proposals are also briefly discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. From Greek stoicheion, element. Often spelt “stoichiometric”.

  2. IUPAC denote the relative mass of an atom by A r and of a molecule by M r.

  3. This is most easily seen by considering a simple example, e.g. 2H2 + O2 → 2H2O. In this reaction, the number of H2 molecules reacting is equal to twice the number of O2 molecules reacting, as given by Eq. 4.

  4. IUPAC denote the mass of an atom by m a and of a molecule or formula unit by m f.

  5. At the 2011 meeting of the IUPAC Commission on Isotopic Abundances and Atomic Weights (CIAAW), the Commission proposed that “amount of substance” be renamed “number of entities” and the mole be defined as a number. This confounds the two schemes.

References

  • Atkins, P.W., de Paula, J.: Physical Chemistry, 7th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, P., Bettin, H.: The Avogadro constant: determining the number of atoms in a single-crystal 28Si sphere. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 369, 3925–3935 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Censullo, A.C., Hill, T.P., Miller, J.: From the current “kilogram problem” to a proposed definition. Chem. Int. 33(5), 9–12 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E.R., et al.: Quantities, Units and Symbols in Physical Chemistry, 3rd edn. IUPAC, RSC, Cambridge (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • DeToma, R.P.: Symbolic algebra and stoichiometry. J. Chem. Educ. 71, 568–570 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furió, C., Azcona, R., Guisasola, J.: The learning and teaching of the concepts “amount of substance” and “mole”: a review of the literature. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 3, 277–292 (2002). www.uoi.gr/cerp

  • Gorin, G.: “Chemical amount” or “chemiance”: proposed names for the quantity measured in mole units. J. Chem. Educ. 59, 508 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, T.P.: Criticisms of the proposed “new SI”. Accred. Qual. Assur. 16, 471–472 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeannin, Y.: A fixed Avogadro constant or a fixed carbon-12 molar mass: which one to choose? Chem. Int. 32(1), 8–11 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, D.M.: Atoms and Elements. Hutchinson, London (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, B.P.: Comments on recent proposals for redefining the mole and kilogram. Metrologia 47, L5–L8 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGlashan, M.L.: Physico-chemical Quantities and Units. The Royal Institute of Chemistry, London (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • McGlashan, M.L.: The mole. Educ. Chem. 14, 189 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J., Hill, T.P., Censullo, A.: Unresolved concerns about the “new SI”. Accred. Qual. Assur. 16, 657–658 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, I.M., Mohr, P.J., Quinn, T.J., Taylor, B.N., Williams, E.R.: Adapting the International System of Units to the twenty-first century. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 369, 3907–3924 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, I.M., Milton, M.: Amount of substance and the mole. Chem. Int. 31(2), 3–7 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton, M.J.T.: A new definition of the mole based on the Avogadro constant: a journey from physics to chemistry. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 369, 3993–4003 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milton, M.J.T., Mills, I.M.: Amount of substance and the proposed redefinition of the mole. Metrologia 46, 332–338 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, P.G.: The elusive mole. Educ. Chem. 28, 103–104 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, P.G.: Teaching chemistry progressively: from substances, to atoms and molecules, to electrons and nuclei. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 3, 215–228 (2002). www.uoi.gr/cerp

  • Nelson, P.G.: The new SI. Chem. World, October p 43; December p 42 (2011)

  • Ostwald, W.: Hand-und Hilfsbuch zur Ausführung Physiko-Chemischer Messungen. Engelmann, Leipzig (1893)

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer, J.E.: Difficulties with stoichiometry. Educ. Chem. 25, 92–95 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavese, F.: Some reflections on the proposed redefinition of the unit for the amount of substance and of other SI units. Accred. Qual. Assur. 16, 161–165 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, G.: A skeptic’s review of the new SI. Accred. Qual. Assur. 16, 121–132 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B.N.: Molar mass and related quantities in the new SI. Metrologia 46, L16–L19 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, N.: On the dimensionality of the Avogadro constant and the definition of the mole. Metrologia 48, 71–82 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, L., Mester, Z., Sturgeon, R.E., Meija, J.: Determination of the atomic weight of 28Si-enriched silicon for a revised estimate of the Avogadro constant. Anal. Chem. 84, 2321–2327 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Dr. Chris Botton for encouraging me to write this paper and to Professor Brian P. Leonard for drawing my attention to the new SI proposals.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter G. Nelson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nelson, P.G. What is the mole?. Found Chem 15, 3–11 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-013-9185-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-013-9185-1

Keywords

Navigation