Skip to main content
Log in

Enacting silence: Residual categories as a challenge for ethics, information systems, and communication

  • Published:
Ethics and Information Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Residual categories are those which cannot be formally represented within a given classification system. We examine the forms that residuality takes within our information systems today, and explore some silences which form around those inhabiting particular residual categories. We argue that there is significant ethical and political work to be done in exploring residuality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Gloria A. (1987) Borderlands = La Frontera: The New Mestiza. Spinsters/Aunt Lute, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • M.M. Bakhtin, Art and Answerability: Early Philosophical Essays. In Michael Holquist and Vadim Liapunov, editors, translated by V. Liapunov. University of Texas Press, Austin, 1990

  • Becker H.S. (1963) Outsiders. Free Press of Glencoe, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker G.C., Star S.L. (1999) Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford J., Marcus G. (editors) (1986) Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida J. (1988) Limited Inc. Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J. (1989) Experience and Nature. Open Court Press, La Salle, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Dewey, The Quest for Certainty: A Study of the Relation of Knowledge and Action. Minton, Balch, New York, 1929

  • Epstein S. (1996) Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Ferguson, G. Martha, Trinh T. Minh-Ha, and Cornel West, editors, Out there: Marginalization and Contemporary Cultures. New Museum of Contemporary Art, New␣York, and MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990

  • Golding W. (1960) Free Fall. Harcourt Brace, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking Ian. (1995) Rewriting the Soul: Multiple Personality and the Sciences of Memory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Jullien, The Propensity of Things: Toward a History of Efficacy in China, translated by J. Lloyd. Zone Books, New York, 1995

  • Kirk S.A., Kutchins H. (1992) The Selling of the DSM: The Rhetoric of Science in Psychiatry. Aldine de Gruyter, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Latour, Aramis or the Love of Technology, translated by Catherine Porter. Harvard University Press, 1996

  • Levins R., Lewontin R. (1985) The Dialectical Biologist. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Linde C. (1993) Life Stories: The Creation of Coherence. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarry E. (1985) The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle J.R. (1977) Reiterating the differences: A reply to Derrida. Glyph I: 198–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin S., Schaffer S. (1986) The Air Pump and the Leviathan. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Star S.L. (1991a) The Sociology of the Invisible: The Primacy of Work in the Writing of Anselm Strauss. In: David M. (ed) Social Organization and Social Process: Essays in Honor of Anselm Strauss. Aldine de Gruyter, Hawthorne, NY, pp. 265–283

    Google Scholar 

  • S.L. Star. Power, Technologies and the Phenomenology of Standards: on Being Allergic to Onions. In John Law, editor, A Sociology of Monsters? Power, Technology and the Modern World, pp. 27–57. Sociological Review Monograph. No. 38. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1991b

  • Star S.L. (1998) Experience: The Link Between Science, Sociology of Science and Science Education. In: Shelley G., James G. (eds) Thinking Practices. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 127–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Star S.L. (1999) The Ethnography of Infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43: 377–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geoffrey C. Bowker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Star, S.L., Bowker, G.C. Enacting silence: Residual categories as a challenge for ethics, information systems, and communication. Ethics Inf Technol 9, 273–280 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-007-9141-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-007-9141-7

Keywords

Navigation