Skip to main content
Log in

Reducing Child-Related Negative Attitudes, Attributions of Hostile Intent, Anger, Harsh Parenting Behaviors, and Punishment Through Evaluative Conditioning

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Six studies explored the extent to which evaluative conditioning (EC) can change adults’ child-related attitudes and expectations. A subset of studies also investigated the extent to which EC can change child-related attributions of hostile intent, anger, use of harsh discipline, and use of punishment. An initial study demonstrated that a brief EC procedure increased positive attitudes, decreased negative attitudes, and decreased expected need for future child discipline; findings that were replicated in five additional studies. A randomized controlled trial demonstrated these findings were present in the EC condition, but not in a control condition. Increases in positive child attitudes and decreases in the expected need for future child discipline (but not decreases in negative child attitudes) were maintained at a follow-up assessment. EC increases in positive attitudes generalized to child stimuli similar to those used in the EC procedure (exemplars), but no other EC-induced changes were found for exemplars. EC reduced child-related attributions of hostile intent, anger, use of harsh verbal discipline, use of harsh physical discipline, and use of punishment for ambiguous child behaviors. There was no evidence that EC effects were due to demand characteristics and little evidence that EC effects were moderated by demographic characteristics. It is yet to be determined whether the observed EC changes can be produced when a parent’s own child is used in the EC procedure and whether EC can produce changes in negative parenting behaviors that are maintained across time. The possible use of EC as an adjunct to existing parenting programs is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baeyens, F., Díaz, E., & Ruiz, G. (2005). Resistance to extinction of human evaluative conditioning using a between-subjects design. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 245–268. doi:10.1080/02699930441000300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baeyens, F., Eelen, P., Van den Bergh, O., & Crombez, G. (1992). The content of learning in human evaluative conditioning: Acquired valence is sensitive to US-revaluation. Learning and Motivation, 23, 200–224. doi:10.1016/0023-9690(92)90018-H.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, W. D., & Twentyman, C. T. (1985). Abusing, neglectful and comparison mothers’ responses to child-related and non-child-related stressors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 335–343. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.53.3.335.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370. doi:10.1037//1089-2680.5.4.323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, L. (1990). On the formation and regulation of anger and aggression: A cognitive- neoassociationistic analysis. American Psychologist, 45, 494–503. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.45.4.494.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, L. (2012). A different view of anger: The cognitive-neoassociation conception of the relation of anger to aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 28, 222–333. doi:10.1002/ab.21432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohr, Y., Dhayanandhan, B., Armour, L., Sockett DiMarco, N., Holigrocki, R. J., & Baumgartner, E. (2008). Mapping parent-infant interactions: A brief cognitive approach to the prevention of relationship ruptures and infant maltreatment (The MAP method). Infant Mental Health Promotion: IMPrint, 51, 2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugental, D. B., Ellerson, P. C., Lin, E. K., Rainey, B., Kokotovic, A., & O’Hara, N. (2002). A cognitive approach to child abuse prevention. Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 243–258. doi:10.1037//0893-3200.16.3.243.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bugental, D. B., Johnston, C., New, M., & Silvester, J. (1998). Measuring parental attributions: Conceptual and methodological issues. Journal of Family Psychology, 12, 459–480. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.12.4.459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1997). Beyond bipolar conceptualization and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 3–25. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, H., & Gu, H. (2009). A mixed model approach for intent-to-treat analysis in longitudinal clinical trials with missing values. RTI Press publication No. MR-0009- 0903. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International. doi:10.3768/rtipress.2009.mr.0009.0903.

  • Chen, P., Coccaro, E. F., & Jacobson, K. C. (2012). Hostile attributional bias, negative emotional responding, and aggression in adults: Moderating effects of gender and impulsivity. Aggressive Behavior, 38, 47–63. doi:10.1002/ab.21407.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Clerkin, E. M., & Teachman, B. (2010). Training implicit social anxiety associations: An experimental intervention. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 24, 300–308. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.01.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cone, J., & Ferguson, M. J. (2015). He did what? The role of diagnosticity in revising implicit evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 37–57. doi:10.1037/pspa0000014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, J. L., Milner, J. S., Skowronski, J. J., Farc, M. M., Irwin, L. M., & Neese, A. (2010). Automatic encoding of ambiguous child behavior in high and low risk for child physical abuse parents. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 73–80. doi:10.1007/s10896-009-9271-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Castro, B. O., Veerman, J. W., Koops, W., Bosch, J. D., & Monshouwer, H. J. (2002). Hostile attributions of intent and aggressive behavior: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 73, 916–934. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Houwer, J., Thomas, S., & Baeyens, F. (2001). Associative learning of likes and dislikes: A review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 853–869. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.6.853.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dix, T., Ruble, D. N., & Zambarano, R. J. (1989). Mothers’ implicit theories of discipline: Child effects, parent effects, and the attribution process. Child Development, 60, 1373–1391. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1989.tb04010.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epps, J., & Kendall, P. C. (1995). Hostile attributional bias in adults. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 19, 159–178. doi:10.1007/BF02229692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farc, M. F., Crouch, J. L., Skowronski, J. J., & Milner, J. S. (2008). Hostile ratings by parents at risk for child abuse: Impact of chronic and temporary schema activation. Child Abuse and Neglect, 32, 177–193. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.06.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692–731. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gawronski, B., & Mitchell, D. G. V. (2014). Simultaneous conditioning of valence and arousal. Cognition and Emotion, 28, 577–595. doi:10.1080/02699931.2013.843506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gawronski, B., Rydell, R. J., Vervliet, B., & De Houwer, J. (2010). Generalization versus contextualization in automatic evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 683–701. doi:10.1037/a0020315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng, L., Liu, L., Xu, J., Zhou, K., & Fang, Y. (2013). Can evaluative conditioning change implicit attitudes towards recycling? Social Behavior and Personality, 41, 947–956. doi:10.2224/sbp.2013.41.6.947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, B. (2008). Can evaluative conditioning change attitudes toward mature brands? New evidence from the implicit association test. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 178–188. doi:10.1086/527341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halligan, S. L., Cooper, P. J., Healy, S. J., & Murray, L. (2007). The attribution of hostile intent in mothers, fathers and their children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 594–604. doi:10.1007/s10802-007-9115-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haskett, M. E., Scott, S. S., Willoughby, M., Ahem, L., & Nears, K. (2006). The parent opinion questionnaire and child vignettes for use with abusive parents: Assessment of psychometric properties. Journal of Family Violence, 21, 137–151. doi:10.1007/s10896-005-9010-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, W., De Houwer, J., Perugini, M., Baeyens, F., & Crombez, G. (2010). Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 390–421. doi:10.1037/a0018916.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hollands, G. J., Prestwich, A., & Marteau, T. M. (2011). Using aversive images to enhance healthy food choices and implicit attitudes: An experimental test of evaluative conditioning. Health Psychology, 30, 195–203. doi:10.1037/a0022261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Houben, K., Havermans, R. C., & Wiers, R. W. (2010). Learning to dislike alcohol: Conditioning negative implicit attitudes toward alcohol and its effect on drinking behavior. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 211, 79–86. doi:10.1007/s00213-010-1872-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Katsurada, E., & Sugawara, A. I. (1998). The relationship between hostile attribution bias and aggression in preschoolers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 13, 623–636. doi:10.1016/S0885-2006(99)80064-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerkhof, I., Vansteenwegen, D., Baeyens, F., & Hermans, D. (2011). Counterconditioning: An effective technique for changing conditioned preferences. Experimental Psychology, 58, 31–38. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000063.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, R. J., Crouch, J. L., Basham, A., Milner, J. S., & Skowronski, J. J. (2016). Validating the voodoo doll task as a proxy for aggressive parenting behaviors. Psychology of Violence, 6, 135–144. doi:10.1037/a0038456.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milner, J. S. (2000). Social information processing and child physical abuse: Theory and research. In D. J. Hansen (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Vol. 45. Motivation and child maltreatment (pp. 39–84). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nix, R. L., Pinderhughes, E. E., Dodge, K. A., Bates, J. E., Pettit, G. S., & McFadyen-Ketchum, S. A. (1999). The relation between mothers’ hostile attribution tendencies and children’s externalizing behavior problems: The mediating role of mothers’ harsh discipline practices. Child Development, 70, 896–909. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00065.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. A., & Fazio, H. (2006). Reducing automatically activated racial prejudice through implicit evaluative conditioning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 421–433. doi:10.1177/0146167205284004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raes, A. K., & De Raedt, R. (2012). The effect of counterconditioning on evaluative responses and harm expectancy in a fear conditioning paradigm. Behavior Therapy, 43, 757–767. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2012.03.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rozin, R., Berman, L., & Royzman, E. (2010). Biases in use of positive and negative words across twenty natural languages. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 536–548. doi:10.1080/02699930902793462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, M. (2014). Perceived awareness of the research hypothesis (PARH) scale. Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/site/markrubinsocialpsychresearch/a-measure-of-the-influence-of-demand-characteristics.

  • Rubin, M., Paolini, S., & Crisp, R. J. (2010). A processing fluency explanation of bias against migrants. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 21–28. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.09.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slep, A. M. S., & O’Leary, S. G. (1998). The effects of maternal attributions on parenting: An experimental analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 12, 234–243. doi:10.1037//0893-3200.12.2.234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprague, J., Verona, E., Kalkhoff, W., & Kilmer, A. (2011). Moderators and mediators of the stress-aggression relationship: Executive function and state anger. Emotion, 11, 61–73. doi:10.1037/a0021788.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Staats, C. K., & Staats, A. W. (1957). Meaning established by classical conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 74–80. doi:10.1037/h0048859.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M. M., Zanna, M. P., & Griffin, D. W. (1995). Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 361–386). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkowski, B. M., & Robinson, M. D. (2010). The anatomy of anger: An integrative cognitive model of trait anger and reactive aggression. Journal of Personality, 78, 9–38. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00607.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joel S. Milner.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Joel S. Milner, Michael F. Wagner, and Julie L. Crouch declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (national and institutional). Informed consent was obtained from all individual subjects participating in the study.

Animal Rights

No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Milner, J.S., Wagner, M.F. & Crouch, J.L. Reducing Child-Related Negative Attitudes, Attributions of Hostile Intent, Anger, Harsh Parenting Behaviors, and Punishment Through Evaluative Conditioning. Cogn Ther Res 41, 43–61 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-016-9800-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-016-9800-2

Keywords

Navigation