Abstract
There is a growing interest in copy number variation (CNV) and the recognition of its importance in phenotype, disease, adaptation and speciation. CNV data is usually ascertained by array-CGH within-species, but similar inter-species comparisons have also been made in primates, mice and domestic mammals. Here, we conducted a broad appraisal of putative cross-species CNVs in birds, 16 species in all, using the standard array-CGH approach. Using a chicken oligonucleotide microarray, we detected 790 apparent CNVs within 135 unique regions and developed a bioinformatic tool ‘CNV Analyser’ for analysing and visualising cross-species data sets. We successfully addressed four hypotheses as follows: (a) Cross-species CNVs (compared to chicken) are, as suggested from preliminary evidence, smaller and fewer in number than in mammals; this ‘dogma’ was rejected in the light of the new evidence. (b) CNVs in birds are likely to have a functional effect through an association with genes; a large proportion of detected regions (70 %) were indeed associated with genes (suggesting functional significance), however, not necessarily more so than in mammals. (c) There are more CNVs in birds with more rearranged karyotypes; this hypothesis was rejected. Indeed, Falco species contained fewer than most with relatively standard (chicken-like) karyotypes. (d) There are more CNVs per megabase on micro-chromosomes than macrochromosomes; this hypothesis was accepted. Indeed, in species with rearranged karyotypes characterised by chromosomal fusions, the fused former microchromosomes still ‘behaved’ as though they were their microchromosomal ancestors. Gene ontology analysis of CNVRs revealed enrichment in immune response and antigen presentation genes and five CNVRs were perfectly correlated with the unique loss of sexual dichromatism in one Galliformes species.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CNV:
-
copy number variation
- CNVs:
-
copy number variants
- CNVR:
-
copy number variable regions
- CGH:
-
comparative genomic hybridization
- NAHR:
-
non allelic homologous recombination
- qPCR:
-
quantitative polymerase chain reaction
- FISH:
-
fluorescence in-situ hybridization
- GGA:
-
Gallus gallus (chicken)
- MHC:
-
major histocompatability complex
References
Bailey JA, Eichler EE (2006) Primate segmental duplications: crucibles of evolution, diversity and disease. Nat Rev Genet 7(7):552–564
Bed’Hom B, Coullin P, Guillier-Gencik Z, Moulin S, Bernheim A, Volobouev V (2003) Characterization of the atypical karyotype of the black-winged kite Elanus caeruleus (Falconiformes: Accipitridae) by means of classical and molecular cytogenetic techniques. Chromosom Res 11(4):335–343
Bonilla AJ, Braun EL, Kimball RT (2010) Comparative molecular evolution and phylogenetic utility of 3′-UTRs and introns in Galliformes. Mol Phylogenet Evol 56(2):536–542
Borisov AB, Raeker MO, Kontrogianni-Konstantopoulos A, Yang K, Kurnit DM, Bloch RJ, Russell MW (2003) Rapid response of cardiac obscurin gene cluster to aortic stenosis: differential activation of Rho-GEF and MLCK and involvement in hypertrophic growth. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 310(3):910–918
Burt DW (2005) Chicken genome: current status and future opportunities. Genome Res 15(12):1692–1698
Burt DW, Bruley C, Dunn IC, Jones CT, Ramage A, Law AS, Morrice DR, Paton IR, Smith J, Windsor D (1999) The dynamics of chromosome evolution in birds and mammals. Nature 402(6760):411–413
Chen W-K, Swartz JD, Rush LJ, Alvarez CE (2009) Mapping DNA structural variation in dogs. Genome Res 19(3):500–509
Colobran R, Pedrosa E, Carretero–Iglesia L, Juan M (2010) Copy number variation in chemokine superfamily: the complex scene of CCL3L–CCL4L genes in health and disease. Clin Exp Immunol 162(1):41–52
Crooijmans RPMA, Fife MS, Fitzgerald T, Strickland S, Cheng HH, Kaiser P, Redon R, Groenen MAM (2013) Large scale variation in DNA copy number in chicken breeds. BMC Genomics 14:398
Da Wei Huang BTS, Lempicki RA (2008) Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 4(1):44–57
Dalloul RA, Long JA, Zimin AV, Aslam L, Beal K, Bouffard P, Burt DW, Crasta O, Crooijmans RP, Cooper K (2010) Multi-platform next-generation sequencing of the domestic turkey (Meleagris gallopavo): genome assembly and analysis. PLoS Biol 8(9):e1000475
Dumas L, Kim YH, Karimpour-Fard A, Cox M, Hopkins J, Pollack JR, Sikela JM (2007) Gene copy number variation spanning 60 million years of human and primate evolution. Genome Res 17(9):1266–1277
Emanuel BS, Saitta SC (2007) From microscopes to microarrays: dissecting recurrent chromosomal rearrangements. Nat Rev Genet 8(11):869–883
Ewald S, Livant E (2004) Distinctive polymorphism of chicken B-FI (major histocompatibility complex class I) molecules. Poult Sci 83(4):600–605
Fadista J, Nygaard M, Holm L-E, Thomsen B, Bendixen C (2008) A snapshot of CNVs in the pig genome. PLoS One 3(12):e3916
Fadista J, Thomsen B, Holm L-E, Bendixen C (2010) Copy number variation in the bovine genome. BMC Genomics 11(1):284
Feuk L, Carson AR, Scherer SW (2006) Structural variation in the human genome. Nat Rev Genet 7(2):85–97
Fontanesi L, Martelli P, Beretti F, Riggio V, Dall’Olio S, Colombo M, Casadio R, Russo V, Portolano B (2010) An initial comparative map of copy number variations in the goat (Capra hircus) genome. BMC Genomics 11(1):639
Fontanesi L, Beretti F, Martelli P, Colombo M, Dall’Olio S, Occidente M, Portolano B, Casadio R, Matassino D, Russo V (2011) A first comparative map of copy number variations in the sheep genome. Genomics 97(3):158–165
Fortna A, Kim Y, MacLaren E, Marshall K, Hahn G, Meltesen L, Brenton M, Hink R, Burgers S, Hernandez-Boussard T (2004) Lineage-specific gene duplication and loss in human and great ape evolution. PLoS Biology 2(7):e207
Freeman JL, Perry GH, Feuk L, Redon R, McCarroll SA, Altshuler DM, Aburatani H, Jones KW, Tyler-Smith C, Hurles ME (2006) Copy number variation: new insights in genome diversity. Genome Res 16(8):949–961
Frey N, Olson EN (2002) Calsarcin-3, a novel skeletal muscle-specific member of the calsarcin family, interacts with multiple Z-disc proteins. J Biol Chem 277(16):13998–14004
Graubert TA, Cahan P, Edwin D, Selzer RR, Richmond TA, Eis PS, Shannon WD, Li X, McLeod HL, Cheverud JM (2007) A high-resolution map of segmental DNA copy number variation in the mouse genome. PLoS Genet 3(1):e3
Gregory TR (2005) The evolution of the genome. Academic Press
Griffin D, Robertson L, Tempest H, Skinner B (2007) The evolution of the avian genome as revealed by comparative molecular cytogenetics. Cytogenetic Genome Res 117(1–4):64–77
Griffin DK, Robertson LB, Tempest HG, Vignal A, Fillon V, Crooijmans RP, Groenen MA, Deryusheva S, Gaginskaya E, Carré W (2008) Whole genome comparative studies between chicken and turkey and their implications for avian genome evolution. BMC genomics 9(1):168
Hillier LW, Miller W, Birney E, Warren W, Hardison RC, Ponting CP, Bork P, Burt DW, Groenen MA, Delany ME (2004) Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature 432(7018):695–716
Iskow RC, Gokcumen O, Lee C (2012) Exploring the role of copy number variants in human adaptation. Trends in Genetics
Jurata LW, Gill GN (1997) Functional analysis of the nuclear LIM domain interactor NLI. Mol Cell Biol 17(10):5688–5698
Kehrer-Sawatzki H, Cooper DN (2008) Molecular mechanisms of chromosomal rearrangement during primate evolution. Chromosom Res 16(1):41–56
Kimball RT, Braun EL (2008) A multigene phylogeny of Galliformes supports a single origin of erectile ability in non–feathered facial traits. J Avian Biol 39(4):438–445
Kimball RT, Mary CMS, Braun EL (2011) A macroevolutionary perspective on multiple sexual traits in the Phasianidae (Galliformes). International, journal of evolutionary biology 2011
Lander ES, Linton LM, Birren B, Nusbaum C, Zody MC, Baldwin J, Devon K, Dewar K, Doyle M, FitzHugh W (2001) Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409(6822):860–921
Lee CW, Hwang I, Park C-S, Lee H, Park D-W, Kang S-J, Lee S-W, Kim Y-H, Park S-W, Park S-J (2012) Expression of ADAMTS-2,-3,-13, and-14 in culprit coronary lesions in patients with acute myocardial infarction or stable angina. J Thromb Thrombolysis 33(4):362–370
Liu GE, Hou Y, Zhu B, Cardone MF, Jiang L, Cellamare A, Mitra A, Alexander LJ, Coutinho LL, Dell’Aquila ME (2010) Analysis of copy number variations among diverse cattle breeds. Genome Res 20(5):693–703
Locke DP, Segraves R, Carbone L, Archidiacono N, Albertson DG, Pinkel D, Eichler EE (2003) Large-scale variation among human and great ape genomes determined by array comparative genomic hybridization. Genome Res 13(3):347–357
Lupski JR (1998) Genomic disorders: structural features of the genome can lead to DNA rearrangements and human disease traits. Trends Genet: TIG 14(10):417
Mah W, Ko J, Nam J, Han K, Chung WS, Kim E (2010) Selected SALM (synaptic adhesion-like molecule) family proteins regulate synapse formation. J Neurosci 30(16):5559–5568
Nanda I, Karl E, Volobouev V, Griffin D, Schartl M, Schmid M (2006) Extensive gross genomic rearrangements between chicken and Old World vultures (Falconiformes: Accipitridae). Cytogenetic Genome Res 112(3–4):286–295
Newman TL, Tuzun E, Morrison VA, Hayden KE, Ventura M, McGrath SD, Rocchi M, Eichler EE (2005) A genome-wide survey of structural variation between human and chimpanzee. Genome Res 15(10):1344–1356
Nishida C, Ishijima J, Kosaka A, Tanabe H, Habermann FA, Griffin DK, Matsuda Y (2008) Characterization of chromosome structures of Falconinae (Falconidae, Falconiformes, Aves) by chromosome painting and delineation of chromosome rearrangements during their differentiation. Chromosom Res 16(1):171–181
Ohno S (1970) Evolution by gene duplication. London: George Alien & Unwin Ltd. Berlin, Heidelberg and New York: Springer-Verlag
Olshen AB, Venkatraman E, Lucito R, Wigler M (2004) Circular binary segmentation for the analysis of array–based DNA copy number data. Biostatistics 5(4):557–572
Perry GH, Tchinda J, McGrath SD, Zhang J, Picker SR, Cáceres AM, Iafrate AJ, Tyler-Smith C, Scherer SW, Eichler EE (2006) Hotspots for copy number variation in chimpanzees and humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103(21):8006–8011
Perry GH, Dominy NJ, Claw KG, Lee AS, Fiegler H, Redon R, Werner J, Villanea FA, Mountain JL, Misra R (2007) Diet and the evolution of human amylase gene copy number variation. Nature genetics 39(10):1256–1260
Redon R, Ishikawa S, Fitch KR, Feuk L, Perry GH, Andrews TD, Fiegler H, Shapero MH, Carson AR, Chen W (2006) Global variation in copy number in the human genome. Nature 444(7118):444–454
Repping S, van Daalen SK, Brown LG, Korver CM, Lange J, Marszalek JD, Pyntikova T, van der Veen F, Skaletsky H, Page DC (2006) High mutation rates have driven extensive structural polymorphism among human Y chromosomes. Nat Genet 38(4):463–467
Samonte RV, Eichler EE (2002) Segmental duplications and the evolution of the primate genome. Nat Rev Genet 3(1):65–72
Schmid M, Nanda I, Burt DW (2005) Second report on chicken genes and chromosomes 2005. Cytogenetic and Genome Res 109(4):415–479
Skinner B, Griffin D (2011) Intrachromosomal rearrangements in avian genome evolution: evidence for regions prone to breakpoints. Heredity 108(1):37–41
Skinner B, Robertson L, Tempest H, Langley E, Ioannou D, Fowler K, Crooijmans R, Hall A, Griffin D, Völker M (2009) Comparative genomics in chicken and Pekin duck using FISH mapping and microarray analysis. BMC genomics 10(1):357
St Clair D (2009) Copy number variation and schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 35(1):9–12
Stankiewicz P, Lupski JR (2002) Genome architecture, rearrangements and genomic disorders. Trends Genet: TIG 18(2):74
Stefansson H, Rujescu D, Cichon S, Pietiläinen OP, Ingason A, Steinberg S, Fossdal R, Sigurdsson E, Sigmundsson T, Buizer-Voskamp JE (2008) Large recurrent microdeletions associated with schizophrenia. Nature 455(7210):232–236
Szmola R, Kukor Z, Sahin-Tóth M (2003) Human mesotrypsin is a unique digestive protease specialized for the degradation of trypsin inhibitors. J Biol Chem 278(49):48580–48589
Völker M, Backström N, Skinner BM, Langley EJ, Bunzey SK, Ellegren H, Griffin DK (2010) Copy number variation, chromosome rearrangement, and their association with recombination during avian evolution. Genome Res 20(4):503–511
Wang X, Nahashon S, Feaster TK, Bohannon-Stewart A, Adefope N (2010) An initial map of chromosomal segmental copy number variations in the chicken. BMC Genomics 11(1):351
Wang J, Jiang J, Fu W, Jiang L, Ding X, Liu J-F, Zhang Q (2012) A genome-wide detection of copy number variations using SNP genotyping arrays in swine. BMC Genomics 13(1):273
Warren WC, Clayton DF, Ellegren H, Arnold AP, Hillier LW, Künstner A, Searle S, White S, Vilella AJ, Fairley S (2010) The genome of a songbird. Nature 464(7289):757–762
Watson KL, Justice RW, Bryant PJ (1994) Drosophila in cancer research: the first fifty tumor suppressor genes. J Cell Sci Suppl 18:19
Workman C, Jensen LJ, Jarmer H, Berka R, Gautier L, Nielser HB, Saxild H-H, Nielsen C, Brunak S, Knudsen S (2002) A new non-linear normalization method for reducing variability in DNA microarray experiments. Genome Biol 3(9):1–16
Acknowledgements
We thank Wingham Wildlife Park, Kent, Cherry Valley Farms, British United Turkeys, and the Central Veterinary Research Laboratory in Dubai, and the Falcon Hospital Dubai for providing feathers and blood samples from which the DNA samples were extracted.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editors: Darren K. Griffin and Beth A. Sullivan.
Benjamin M. Skinner, Abdullah Al Mutery, and Deborah Smith are joint first authors for this article.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(XLS 311 kb)
ESM 2
Numbers of CNVRs containing genes in each species, and the proportion of genes that are protein-coding (EPS 2389 kb)
ESM 3
Heatmap in which gains are shown in green, losses in red, with the brightness proportional to the log2 ratio of the CNV. The animals and CNVs have been clustered, revealing patterns of lineage-specific CNVRs, and demonstrating that losses are more frequently shared across multiple species than gains (EPS 5090 kb)
ESM 4
The number of CNVRs which are unique to one species, or which are shared between two or more species. Gains are shared between at most four species; losses are shared with up to 18 species. Shared losses are likely attributable to sequence divergence rather than true copy number change (EPS 1300 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Skinner, B.M., Al Mutery, A., Smith, D. et al. Global patterns of apparent copy number variation in birds revealed by cross-species comparative genomic hybridization. Chromosome Res 22, 59–70 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-014-9405-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-014-9405-0