Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Eradication of cross-contaminated cell lines: A call for action

  • Published:
Cell Biology and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This “white paper” was prepared and widely disseminated in an attempt to sound an alarm about the long-term existence of a grave, unresolved and growing problem that affects a significant portion of biomedical research, namely, the use of misidentified and cross-contaminated cell cultures. The “white paper” shows how bold action could bring about a profession-wide change in practice that would prevent further erosion. Misidentification and inter- and intra-specific cross-contamination of mammalian cell cultures used in research continues as a widespread problem despite an awareness that dates back more than 45 years. Awareness of the problem has led to a good understanding of the causes of cross-contamination and appropriate preventive measures. It has also led to the application of robust methods for the authentication of cell lines. Yet the problem continues unabated. Estimates of the incidence of research papers flawed by the use of misidentified and cross-contaminated cell cultures approximate 15–20%. The gravity of the situation calls for a strategy that would deliver a remedial message of authentication to virtually all cell culture researchers and also ensure compliance with the message. At the core of the strategy proposed herein is having cell line authentication as a condition for the award of research grants and for the publication of research findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bar W, Brinkmann B, Budowle B, et al. DNA recommendations. Further report of the DNA Commission of the ISFH regarding the use of short tandem repeat systems. International Society for Forensic Haemogenetics. Int J Legal Med 1997;110:175–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brand K, Syverton JT. Results of species-specific hemagglutination tests on transformed, non-transformed, and primary cell cultures. J Natl Cancer Inst 1962;25:147–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buehring GC, Eby EA, Eby MJ. Cell line cross-contamination: how aware are mammalian cell culturists of the problem and how to monitor it? In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 2004; 40(7):211–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee R. Cases of mistaken identity. Science 2007;315:928–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coble MD, Just RS, O’Callaghan JE, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphisms over the entire mtDNA genome that increase the power of forensic testing in Caucasians. Int. J Legal Med 2004;118:137–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Culliton BJ. HeLa cells contaminating cultures around the world. Science 1974;184:1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defendi V, Billingham RE, Silvers WK, Moorhead P. Immunological and karyological criteria for identification of cell lines. J Natl Cancer Inst 1960;25:359–85.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson D. Contaminated cell cultures. Nature 1981;289:227.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dirks WG, Drexler HG. Authentication of cancer cell lines by DNA fingerprinting. Methods Mol Med 2004;88:43–55.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drexler HG, Dirks WG, MacLeod RA. False human hematopoietic cell lines: cross-contaminations and misinterpretations. Leukemia 1999;13(10):1601–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drexler HG, Dirks WG, Matsuo Y, MacLeod RA. False leukemia-lymphoma cell lines: an update on over 500 cell lines. Leukemia 2003;17:416–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gartler SM. Genetic markers as tracers in cell culture. NCI Monograph 26: Second Decennial Review Conference on Cell, Tissue, and Organ Culture. NCI; 1967.

  • Gartler SM. Apparent HeLa cell contamination of human heteroploid cell lines. Nature 1968;217:750–1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gey GO. Some aspects of the constitution and behavior of normal and malignant cells maintained in continuous culture. The Harvey Lectures: Series L (1954–1955). New York: The Harvey Society; 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert DA, Reid YA, Gail MH, et al. Application of DNA fingerprints for cell-line individualization. Am J Hum Genet 1990;47:499–514.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gill P, Brinkmann B, d’Aloja E, et al. Considerations from the European DNA profiling group (EDNAP) concerning STR nomenclature. Forensic Sci Int 1997;87:185–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harris N, Gang D, Quay S, et al. Contamination of Hodgkin’s disease cell cultures. Nature 1981;289:228–230.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kniss DA, Xie Y, Li Y, et al. ED(27) trophoblast-like cells isolated from first-trimester chorionic villi are genetically identical to HeLa cells yet exhibit a distinct phenotype. Placenta 2002;23(1):32–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lavappa KS. Survey of ATCC stocks of human cell lines for HeLa contamination. In Vitro. 1978;14(5):469–75.

  • Lee JY, Lee CH, Shim SH, et al. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of the monoblastic cell line U937. Karyotype clarification by G-banding, whole chromosome painting, microdissection and reverse painting, and comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2002; 137:124–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liscovitch M, Ravid D. A case study in misidentification of cancer cell lines: MCF-7/AdrR cells (re-designated NCI/ADR/RES) are derived from OVCAR-8 human ovarian carcinoma cells. Cancer Lett 2006 Feb. 24.

  • MacLeod RA, Dirks WG, Matsuo Y, Kaufmann M, Milch H, Drexler HG. Widespread intraspecies cross-contamination of human tumor cell lines arising at source. Int J Cancer 1999;83(4):555–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Masters JR. HeLa cells 50 years on: the good, the bad and the ugly. Nat Rev Cancer 2002;2:315–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Masters JR. DNA profiling and the authentication of cell lines. In Vitro Cell Develop Biol 2005;41:6A. [Abstract].

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Masters JRW, Bedford P, Kearney A, Povey S, Franks LM. Bladder cancer cell-line cross-contamination: identification using a specific locus-specific minisatellite probe. Br J Cancer 1988;57:284–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Masters JR, Thomson JA, Daly-Burns B, et al. Short tandem repeat profiling provides an international reference standard for human cell lines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:8012–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Melcher R, Maisch K, Koehler S, et al. SKY and genetic fingerprinting reveal a cross-contamination of the putative normal colon epithelial cell line NCOL-1. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2005;151(1):84–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Milanesi E, Ajmone-Marsan Bignotti Losio MN, Bernardi Jo Chegdani F, Sorcini M, Ferrari M. Molecular detection of cell line cross-contaminations using amplified fragment length polymorphism DNA fingerprinting technology. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2003;39:124–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muller S, Eder V, Wienberg J. A nonredundant multicolor bar code as a screening tool for rearrangements in neoplasia. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2004;39:59–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson-Rees W, Flandermeyer R. Inter-and intra-species contamination of human breast tumor cell lines HBC and Br Ca5 and other cell cultures. Science. 1977;195:1343–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson-Rees W, Flandermeyer R, Hawthorne P. Banded marker chromosomes as indicators of intraspecies cellular contamination. Science 1974;184:1093–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson-Rees WA, Daniels DW, Flandermeyer RR. Cross-contamination of cells in culture [Review]. Science 1981;212(4493):446–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien SJ. Cell culture forensics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:7656–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien SJ, Kleiner G, Olson R, Shannon JE. Enzyme polymorphisms as genetic signatures in human cell cultures. Science 1977;195:1345–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ogura H, Fujii R, Hamano M, et al. Detection of HeLa cell contamination-presence of human papillomavirus 18 DNA as HeLa marker in JTC-3, OG and OE cell lines. Jpn J Med Sci Biol 1997;50(4–5):161–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parson W, Kirchebner R, Muhlmann R, et al. Cancer cell line identification by short tandem repeat profiling: power and limitations. The FASEB Journal. 2005. Express article 10.1096/fj.04–3062fje.

  • Rothfels KK, Axelrod A, Siminovitch L, McCullogh E, Parker RC. The origin of altered cell lines from mouse, monkey, and man, as indidcated by chromosome and transplantation studies. In: Berg RW, editor. Proc. 3rd Canadian cancer research conference, 1959. New York: Academic Press; 1959. p. 89–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satoh M, Takeuchi M. Cross-contamination of cell lines as revealed by DNA fingerprinting in the IFO animal cell bank. Res Commun Inst Ferment 1993;16:18–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey GN, Bolton BJ, Doyle A. DNA fingerprinting transforms the art of cell authentication. Nature (Lond.) 1992;357:261–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steube KG, Meyer C, Uphoff CC, Drexler HG. A simple method using beta-globin polymerase chain reaction for the species identification of animal cell lines-a progress report. InVitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 2003;39(10):468–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Helden PD, Wiid IJ, Abrecht CF, Theron E, Thornley AL, Hoal-van Helden EG. Cross-contamination of human esophageal squamous carcinoma cell lines detected by DNA fingerprint analysis. Cancer Res 1988;48(20):5660–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biology Department, Catholic University of America, McCort Ward Hall, Washington, DC, 20064, USA

    Roland M. Nardone

Authors
  1. Roland M. Nardone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roland M. Nardone.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nardone, R.M. Eradication of cross-contaminated cell lines: A call for action. Cell Biol Toxicol 23, 367–372 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10565-007-9019-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10565-007-9019-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation