Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Institutional Environment, Managerial Attitudes and Environmental Sustainability Orientation of Small Firms

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the direct impact of three dimensions of the institutional environment on managerial attitudes toward the natural environment and the direct influence of the latter on the environmental sustainability orientation (ESO) of small firms. We contend that when the institutional environment is perceived by owner–managers as supportive of sound natural environment management practices, they are more likely to develop a positive attitude toward natural environment issues and concerns. Such owner–manager attitudes are likely to lead to a positive and proactive orientation of their firms toward environmental sustainability. The study uses survey data from 166 small manufacturing firms located in three Philippine cities. First, the study develops and tests the measurement models to examine the validity of the constructs representing the firm’s institutional environment, managerial attitudes toward the natural environment and the ESO of firms. Second, the study develops and tests the structural models examining the institutional environment–managerial attitudes–ESO linkages. Multi-sample invariance structural model analysis shows the mediating role of managerial attitudes in the institutional environment–ESO nexus. The findings show that ESO is a construct comprising three dimensions: knowledge of environmental issues, sustainable practices and commitment toward environmental sustainability. The cognitive, regulatory and normative elements of the institutional environment are strongly linked to positive managerial attitudes toward environmental sustainability, which in turn, positively influences the firm’s overall ESO. Managerial attitudes play a mediating role in the institutional environment–ESO linkages. The managerial, practical, research and policy implications of the research findings are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 27–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albareda, L., Lozano, J., & Ysa, T. (2007). Public policies on corporate social responsibility: The role of governments in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 391–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modelling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andres, E., Salinas, E., & Vallejo, J. (2009). Factors affecting corporate environmental strategy in Spanish industrial firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18, 500–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J., & Overton, T. (1977). Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babbie, E. (2007). The practice of social research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organisational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 421–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, S. B. (2002). Corporate environmentalism: The construct and its measurement. Journal of Business Research, 55(3), 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr, S. (2007). Factors influencing environmental attitudes and behaviours: A U.K. case study of household waste management. Environment and Behaviour, 39(4), 435–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baughn, C., Bodie, N., & McIntosh, J. (2007). Corporate social and environmental responsibility in Asian countries and other geographical regions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 14, 189–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belal, A., & Cooper, S. (2011). The absence of corporate social responsibility reporting in Bangladesh. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22, 654–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beliveau, B., Cottril, M., & O’Neill, H. (1994). Predicting corporate social responsiveness: A model drawn from three perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 731–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bello, D., Lohtia, R., & Sangtani, V. (2004). An institutional analysis of supply chain innovations in global marketing channels. Industrial Marketing Management, 33, 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benito, J., & Benito, O. (2006). A review of determinant factors of environmental proactivity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15, 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biemer, P. (2001). Nonresponse bias and measurement bias in a comparison of face to face and telephone interviewing. Journal of Official Statistics, 17(2), 295–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, L., & Härtel, C. (2004). The five capabilities of socially responsible companies. Journal of Public Affairs, 4(2), 125–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branzei, O., & Vertinsky, I. (2002). Eco-sustainability orientation in China and Japan: Differences between proactive and reactive firms. In S. Sharma & M. Starik (Eds.), Research in corporate sustainability: The evolving theory and practice of organizations in the natural environment (pp. 85–122). Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bravante, M., & Holden, W. (2009). Going through the motions: The environmental impact assessment of nonferrous metals mining projects in the Philippines. The Pacific Review, 22(4), 523–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. London: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G., Ahlstrom, D., & Li, H. (2010). Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: Where are we now and where do we need to move in the future? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 421–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busenitz, L., Gomez, C., & Spencer, J. (2000). Country institutional profiles: Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 994–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An Institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M., & Fredrickson, J. (2001). Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 533–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organisational stakeholders. Business Horizons, July/August, 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., & Roberts, R. (2010). Toward a more coherent understanding of the organisation-society relationship: A theoretical consideration for social and environmental accounting research. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 651–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua, F., & Rahman, A. (2011). Institutional pressures and ethical reckoning by business corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 307–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, L. (2008). Managerial attitudes toward environmental management within Australia, the People’s Republic of China and Indonesia. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18, 16–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dashwood, H. (2011). CSR norms and organizational learning in the mining sector. Corporate Governance 12(1), in press.

  • Delmas, M., & Toffel, M. (2004). Stakeholders and environmental management practices: An institutional framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13, 209–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dibrell, C., & Craig, J. (2006). The natural environment, innovation, and firm performance: A comparative study. Family Business Review, 19(4), 275–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dibrell, C., Craig, J., & Hansen, E. (2011). How managerial attitudes toward the natural environment affect market orientation and innovation. Journal of Business Research, 64(4), 401–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DTI. (2005). Micro, small and medium enterprises. Department of Trade and Industry, Philippines. Retrieved July 3, 2011, from http://www.dti.gov.ph/dti/index.php?p=532.

  • Duarte, F. (2010). Working with corporate social responsibility in Brazilian companies: The role of managers’ values in the maintenance of CSR cultures. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(3), 355–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1998). Attitude structure and function. In D. T. Gilbert & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 269–322). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, F. D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grewal, R., & Dharwadkar, R. (2002). The role of institutional environment in marketing channels. Journal of Marketing, 66, 82–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groves, R. M. (2006). Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70(5), 646–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. (2007). Upper Echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper Echelons: The organisation as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(1), 193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, H. (1976). Modern factor analysis. Chicago IL: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, C., & Giering, A. (2001). Personal characteristics as moderators of the relationship between customer satisfaction and loyalty—An empirical analysis. Psychology and Marketing, 18, 43–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, G., & Apostolakou, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in Western Europe: An institutional mirror or substitute? Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 371–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, L. R., & Brett, J. (1984). Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(2), 307–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. (1999). The institutional determinants of social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 20, 163–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelloway, E. (1998). Using LISREL for structural equation modeling: A researcher’s guide. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T. (1997). Country institutional profile: Concept and measurement. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, 180–189.

  • Kuckertz, A., & Wagner, M. (2010). The influence of sustainability orientation on entrepreneurial intentions—Investigating the role of business experience. Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 524–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusku, F. (2007). From necessity to responsibility: Evidence for corporate environmental citizenship activities from a developing country perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 14, 74–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lankford, S. V., Buxton, B. P., Hetzler, R., & Little, J. (1995). Response bias and wave analysis of mailed questionnaires in tourism impact assessments. Journal of Travel Research, 33(1), 8–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindell, M. L., & Whitney, D. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnenluecke, M., & Griffiths, A. (2010). Corporate sustainability and organisational culture. Journal of World Business, 45(4), 357–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masurel, E. (2007). Why SMEs invest in environmental measures: Sustainability evidence from small and medium-sized printing firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 16, 190–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. P., & Munilla, L. S. (1993). Eco-orientation: An emerging business philosophy? Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 1(2), 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milfont, T., & Duckitt, J. (2004). The structure of environmental attitudes: A first and second-order confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(3), 289–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffat, A., & Auer, A. (2006). Corporate environmental innovation (CEI): A government initiative to support corporate sustainability leadership. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 589–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthuri, J., & Gilbert, V. (2011). An institutional analysis of corporate social responsibility in Kenya. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 467–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • NSO. (2010). Manufacturing Sector. 2008 Annual Survey Of Philippines Business And Industry. National Statistics Office. Philippines. Accessed August 26, 2010. http://www.census.gov.ph/data/aspbi2008/factsheets/D%2008%20ASPBI%20FactsheetREV(mftg).pdf.

  • Owen, A., & Videras, J. (2006). Civic cooperation, pro-environment attitudes, and behavioral intentions. Ecological Economics, 58, 814–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozen, S., & Kusku, F. (2009). Corporate environmental citizenship variation in developing countries: An institutional framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 297–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parboteeah, K., Hoegl, M., & Cullen, J. (2008). Managers’ gender role attitudes: A country institutional profile approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 39, 795–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedhazur, E. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioural research: Explanation and prediction. Forth Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petts, J., Herd, A., Gerrard, S., & Horne, C. (1999). The climate and culture of environmental compliance within SMEs. Business Strategy and the Environment, 8, 14–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. (2003). Common method biases in behavioural research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. (1997). Personal ethics and business ethics: The ethical attitudes of owner/managers of small business. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 119–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rettab, B., Brik, A., & Melahi, K. (2009). A study of management perceptions of the impact of corporate social responsibility on organisational performance in emerging economies: The case of Dubai. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 371–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogelberg, S., & Stanton, J. (2007). Understanding and dealing with organisational survey nonresponse. Organisational Research Methods, 10(2), 195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, R., Blackburn, R., & Spence, L. (2000). Environmental management and the small firm: An international comparison. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 6(6), 301–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, R. (2008). Public policy and corporate environmental behaviour: A broader view. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15, 281–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, P. W., Shriver, C., Tabanico, J., & Khazian, A. (2004). Implicit connections with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. (1995). Institutions and organisations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., & Nguan, O. (1999). The biotechnology industry and biodiversity conservation strategies: The influence of managerial interpretations and risk propensity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 8, 46–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, P., & Akoorie, M. (2010). Sustainable environmental practices in the New Zealand wind industry: An analysis of perceived institutional pressures and the role of exports. Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 11(1), 50–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behaviour. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, G., Joseph, M., & Blodgett, J. (2004). Toward the creation of an eco-oriented corporate culture: A proposed model of internal and external antecedents leading to industrial firm eco-orientation. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 19(1), 68–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, F. (1999). The gap between the environmental attitudes and the environmental behaviour of small firms. Business Strategy and the Environment Business, 8, 238–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, J., & Newcomb, M. (1998). Eager, reluctant, and nonresponders to a mailed longitudinal survey: Attitudinal and substance use characteristics differentiate respondents. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(4), 357–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Marrewijk, M., & Werre, M. (2003). Multiple levels of corporate sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 107–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1991). Comparative economic organisations: the analysis of discrete structural alternative. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 269–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, D., Lynch-Wood, G., & Ramsay, J. (2006). Drivers of environmental behaviour in manufacturing SMEs and the implications for CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 317–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwetsloot, G., & van Marrewijk, M. (2004). From quality to sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 55(2), 79–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Doren Chadee of Deakin University for the useful comments on the initial versions of the paper. We thank the two anonymous reviewers and the section editor, Thomas Clarke for their comments which contributed to the improvement of the quality of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management and Marketing, Deakin University, Burwood Highway, Melbourne, Australia

    Banjo Roxas

  2. School of Management, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia

    Alan Coetzer

Authors
  1. Banjo Roxas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alan Coetzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Banjo Roxas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roxas, B., Coetzer, A. Institutional Environment, Managerial Attitudes and Environmental Sustainability Orientation of Small Firms. J Bus Ethics 111, 461–476 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1211-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1211-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation