Abstract
Bowles and Gintis argue that recent work in behavioural economics shows that humans have other-regarding preferences, i.e., are not purely self-interested. They seek to explain how these preferences may have evolved using a multi-level version of gene-culture coevolutionary theory. In this review essay I critically examine their main arguments.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Frank SA (2013) Natural selection. VII. History and interpretation of kin selection theory. J Evol Biol 26:1151–1184
Lehmann L, Keller L, West S, Roze D (2007) Group selection and kin selection: two concepts but one process. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(16):6736–6739
Marshall J (2011) Group selection and kin selection: formally equivalent approaches. Trends Ecol Evol 26(7):325–332
Okasha S (forthcoming) On the ‘equivalence’ of inclusive fitness and multi-level selection: an approach using causal graphs
Robson AJ, Samuelson L (2010) The evolutionary foundation of preferences. In: Benhabib J, Bisin A, Jackson M (eds) Handbook of social economics, vol 1A. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 221–310
Samuleson L, Swinkels JM (2006) Information, evolution and utility. Theor Econ 1:119–142
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Okasha, S. The origins of human cooperation. Biol Philos 28, 873–878 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-013-9392-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-013-9392-0