Abstract
It is common practice to base investment decisions on price projections which are gained from simulations using price processes. The choice of the underlying process is crucial for the simulation outcome. For power plants the core question is the existence of stable long-term cointegration relations. Therefore we investigate the impacts of different ways to model price movements in a portfolio selection model for the German electricity market. Three different approaches of modelling fuel prices are compared: initially, all prices are modelled as correlated random walks. Thereafter the coal price is modelled as random walk. The gas price follows the coal price through a mean-reversion process. Lastly, all prices are modelled as mean reversion processes with correlated residuals. The prices of electricity base and peak futures are simulated using historical correlations with gas and coal prices. Yearly base and peak prices are transformed into an estimated price duration curve followed by the steps power plant dispatch, operational margin and net present value calculation and finally the portfolio selection. The analysis shows that the chosen price process assumptions have significant impacts on the resulting portfolio structure and the weights of individual technologies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Awerbuch S (1995) Market-based irp: it’s easy!. Electr J 8(3): 50–67
Awerbuch S (2000) Investing in photovoltaics: risk, accounting and the value of new technology. Energy Policy (28):1023–1035
Awerbuch S (2004) Towards a finance-oriented valuation of conventional and renewable energy sources in ireland. Report, Sustainable Energy Ireland
Awerbuch S, Berger M (2003) Applying portfolio theory to EU electricity planning and policy-making. Report number EET/2003/03, IEA
Awerbuch S, Stirling A, Jansen J, Beurskens L (2006) Full-spectrum portfolio and diversity analysis of energy technologies. In: Leggio K, Bodde D, Taylor M (eds) Managing enterprise risk, elsevier global energy policy and economics series. Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford, pp 202–222
Bar-Lev D, Katz S (1976) A portfolio approach to fossil fuel procurement in the electric utility industry. J Finance 31(3): 933–947
Beltran H (2009) Modern portfolio theory applied to electricity resource planning. Master of sciences dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Black F, Scholes MS (1973) The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J Political Econ 81(3): 637–654
Blyth W, Bradley R, Bunn D, Clarke C, Wilson T, Yang M (2007) Investment risks under uncertain climate change policy. Energy Policy 35(11): 5766–5773
Deng SJ (2005) Valuation of investment and opportunity-to-invest in power generation assets with spikes in electricity price. Manage Finance 31(6): 95–115. doi:10.1108/03074350510769712
Dixit AK, Pindyck RS (1994) Investment under uncertainty. Princeton University Press, Princeton
EEX: Phelix baseload/peakload year future price data (2009). http://www.eex.com/de/Downloads
EEX: Eex product brochure power (2011). http://cdn.eex.com/document/89877/20110414_EEX_Produktbrosch%C3%BCre_Strom_englisch.pdf
Fleten SE, Näsäkkälä E (2010) Gas-fired power plants: investment timing, operating flexibility and CO2 capture. Energy Econ 32(4): 805–816
Geman H, Shih YF (2009) Modeling commodity prices under the cev model. J Altern Invest 11(3): 65–84. doi:10.3905/JAI.2009.11.3.065
Haldrup N, Nielsen MØ (2006) A regime switching long memory model for eelectricity prices. J Econom. 135(1–2): 349–376
IEA (2008) World energy outlook 2008. International Energy Association (IEA) (2008)
Irwin SH, Zulauf CR, Jackson TE (1996) Monte carlo analysis of mean reversion in commodity futures prices. Am J Agric Econom 78(2): 387–399
Jansen JC, Beurskens LW, van Tilburg X (2006) Application of portfolio analysis to the Dutch generating mix: reference case and two renewables cases: year 2030, SE and GE scenario
Johnson B, Barz G (1999) Selecting stochastic processes for modelling electricity prices. In: Jameson R (ed) Energy modelling and the management of uncertainty. Risk Books, London, pp 3–22
Keles D, Hartel R, Möst D, Fichtner W (2012) Caes power plant investments under uncertain electricity prices. J Energy Markets 5(1): 53–84
Kholodnyi VA (2005) Modeling power forward prices for power with spikes: a non-markovian approach. Nonlinear Anal Theory Methods Appl 63(5-7): 958–965
Konstantin P (2009) Praxisbuch Energiewirtschaft: Energieumwandlung, -transport und -beschaffung im liberalisierten Markt, 2 edn. Springer, Berlin
Krey B, Zweifel P (2008) Efficient electricity portfolios for the united states and switzerland: an investor view. http://www.zora.uzh.ch/52399/
Lucia JJ, Schwartz ES (2002) Electricity prices and power derivatives : evidence from the nordic power exchange. In: Review of derivatives research
Madlener R, Wenk C (2008) Efficient investment portfolios for the swiss electricity supply sector. SSRN eLibrary
Markowitz HM (1952) Portfolio selection. J Finance 7(1): 77–91
Meade N (2010) Oil prices: brownian motion or mean reversion? a study using a one year ahead density forecast criterion. Energy Econ 32(6): 1485–1498
Merton RC (1973) Theory of rational option pricing. Bell J Econ 4(1): 141–183
Muche T (2009) A real option-based simulation model to evaluate investments in pump storage plants. Energy Policy 37(11): 4851–4862
Roques F, Newbery D, Nuttall W (2008) Fuel mix diversification incentives in liberalized electricity markets: A mean-variance portfolio theory approach. Energy Econ 30(4): 1831–1849
Roques F, Nuttall W, Newbery D (2006) Using probabilistic analysis to value power generation investments under uncertainty. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0650, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge. http://ideas.repec.org/p/cam/camdae/0650.html
Rothwell G (2006) A real options approach to evaluating new nuclear power plants. Energy J 27: 37–53
Sachverständigenrat: Die finanzkrise meistern—wachstumskräfte stärken. Jahresgutachten, Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung (German Council of Economic Experts (2008) http://www.sachverstaendigenrat-wirtschaft.de/fileadmin/dateiablage/download/gutachten/ga08_ges.pdf
Schwartz ES (1997) The stochastic behavior of commodity prices: implications for valuation and hedging. J Finance 52(3): 923–973
Seifert J, Uhrig-Homburg M, Wagner M (2008) Dynamic behavior of CO 2 spot prices. J Environ Econ Manag 56(2): 180–194. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2008.03.003
Weber C (2005) Uncertainty in the electric power industry: methods and models for decision support. Springer, Berlin
Weber C (2007) Plants as real options: the importance of price models. In: Ostertag K, Llerena P, Richard A (eds) Option valuation for energy issues. ISI Schriftenreihe, Karlsruhe, pp 116–131
Westner G, Madlener R (2010) The benefit of regional diversification of cogeneration investments in europe: a mean-variance portfolio analysis. Energy Policy 38(12): 7911–7920. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.09.011
Westner G, Madlener R (2011) Development of cogeneration in germany: a mean-variance portfolio analysis of individual technology’s prospects in view of the new regulatory framework. Energy 36(8): 5301–5313. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2011.06.038
Westner G, Madlener R (2011) Investment in new power generation under uncertainty: benefits of chp versus condensing plants in a copula-based analysis. Energy Econ 34: 1–380
White B (2007) A mean-variance portfolio optimization of california’s generation mix to 2020
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ziegler, D., Schmitz, K. & Weber, C. Optimal electricity generation portfolios. Comput Manag Sci 9, 381–399 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10287-012-0150-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10287-012-0150-6