Skip to main content
Log in

Tirofiban versus abciximab: tirofiban is administered at suboptimal dosages when evaluated in an arterial thrombosis model in non-human primates

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical and Experimental Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To prevent thrombosis in high-risk acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for re-vascularisation, concomitant administration of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, such as abciximab, tirofiban or eptifibatide, is recommended. Abciximab and eptifibatide are mostly preferred over tirofiban, which is less effective in preventing ischaemic events. We compared the efficacy and bleeding potential of escalating doses of tirofiban and abciximab in non-human primates. The efficacy of tirofiban and abciximab in inhibiting cyclic flow reductions (CFRs) was tested in a high shear arterial thrombosis model. Bleeding was evaluated with the template bleeding time and an incision bleeding model. Abciximab completely inhibited arterial thrombosis after injection of its therapeutic bolus dose. With tirofiban, a dose three times higher than the recommended therapeutic dose caused weak inhibition characterised by a return of CFRs after re-injury. At nine times the recommended therapeutic dose, complete inhibition was observed, and the efficacy of tirofiban was comparable to abciximab at its therapeutic bolus dose. Blood loss was less than with abciximab at its effective dose. In this model, tirofiban compared favourably with abciximab, although only at a dose of 3–9 times the therapeutic dose, and caused less bleeding than abciximab.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Achar SA, Kundu S, Norcross WA (2005) Diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome. Am Fam Physician 72:119–126

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Grech ED, Ramsdale DR (2003) Acute coronary syndrome: unstable angina and non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. BMJ 326:1259–1261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Falk E (2006) Pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 47(Suppl 8):C7–C12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, Bridges CR, Califf RM, Casey DE Jr et al (2007) ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction—executive summary. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:652–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. EPIC Investigators (1994) Use of a monoclonal antibody directed against the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor in high-risk coronary angioplasty. The EPIC Investigation. N Engl J Med 330:956–961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. EPILOG Investigators (1997) Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade and low-dose heparin during percutaneous coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med 336:1689–1696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. CAPTURE Investigators (1997) Randomised placebo-controlled trial of abciximab before, during coronary intervention in refractory unstable angina: the CAPTURE study. Lancet 349:1429–1435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. IMPACT-II Investigators (1997) Randomised placebo-controlled trial of effect of eptifibatide on complications of percutaneous coronary intervention: IMPACT-II. Integrilin to minimise platelet aggregation and coronary thrombosis-II. Lancet 349:1422–1428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. The RESTORE Investigators (1997) Effects of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade with tirofiban on adverse cardiac events in patients with unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction undergoing coronary angioplasty. Randomized efficacy study of tirofiban for outcomes and restenosis. Circulation 96:1445–1453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. EPISTENT Investigators (1998) Randomised placebo-controlled and balloon-angioplasty-controlled trial to assess safety of coronary stenting with use of platelet glycoprotein-IIb/IIIa blockade. Evaluation of Platelet IIb/IIIa Inhibitor for Stenting. Lancet 352:87–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. ESPRIT Investigators (2000) Novel dosing regimen of eptifibatide in planned coronary stent implantation (ESPRIT): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 356:2037–2044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Batchelor WB, Tolleson TR, Huang Y, Larsen RL, Mantell RM, Dillard P et al (2002) Randomized comparison of platelet inhibition with abciximab, tirofiban and eptifibatide during percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes: the COMPARE trial. Comparison of measurements of platelet aggregation with Aggrastat, Reopro, and eptifibatide. Circulation 106:1470–1476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Herrmann HC, Swierkosz TA, Kapoor S, Tardiff DC, DiBattiste PM, Hirshfeld JW et al (2002) Comparison of degree of platelet inhibition by abciximab versus tirofiban in patients with unstable angina pectoris and non-Q wave myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 89:1293–1297

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Topol EJ, Moliterno DJ, Herrmann HC, Powers ER, Grines CL, Cohen DJ et al (2001) Comparison of two platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, tirofiban and abciximab, for the prevention of ischemic events with percutaneous coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med 334:1888–1894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schneider DJ, Herrmann HC, Lakkis N, Aguirre F, Wan Y, Aggarwal A et al (2002) Enhanced early inhibition of platelet aggregation with an increased bolus of tirofiban. Am J Cardiol 90:1421–1423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schneider DJ, Herrmann HC, Lakkis N, Aguirre F, Lo M, Yin K et al (2003) Increased concentrations of tirofiban in blood and their correlation with inhibition of platelet aggregation after greater bolus doses of tirofiban. Am J Cardiol 91:334–336

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Valgimigli M, Campo G, Percoco G, Bolognese L, Vassanelli C, Colangelo S et al (2008) Comparison of angioplasty with infusion of tirofiban or abciximab and with implantation of sirolimus-eluting or uncoated stents for acute myocardial infarction: the MULTISTRATEGY randomized trial. JAMA 299:1788–1799

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Marzocchi A, Manari A, Piovaccari G, Marrozzini C, Marra S, Magnavacchi P et al (2008) Randomized comparison between tirofiban and abciximab to promote complete ST-resolution in primary angioplasty: results of the facilitated angioplasty with tirofiban or abciximab (FATA) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction trial. Eur Heart J 29:2972–2980

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Valgimigli M, Biondi-Zoccai G, Tebaldi M, Van’t Hof AWJ, Campo G, Hamm C et al (2010) Tirofiban as adjunctive therapy for acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized trial. Eur Heart J 31:35–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fontayne A, Meiring M, Lamprecht S, Roodt J, Demarsin E, Barbeaux P et al (2008) The humanized anti-glycoprotein Ib monoclonal antibody h6B4-Fab is a potent and safe antithrombotic in a high shear rate arterial thrombosis model in baboons. Thromb Haemost 100:670–677

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ulrichts H, Silence K, Schoolmeester A, De Jaegere P, Rossenu S, Roodt J et al (2011) Antithrombotic drug candidate ALX-0081 shows superior preclinical efficacy and safety compared to currently marketed antiplatelet drugs. Blood Prepublished online 16 May, 2011. doi:10.1182/blood-2010-11-317859

  22. Kralisz P, Dobrzycki S, Nowak K, Kochman W, Gajewska-Bachórzewska H, Gugala K et al (2004) Platelet inhibition by increased tirofiban dosing during primary coronary angioplasty for ST elevation myocardial infarction. Kardiologia Polska 60:464–467

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lind SE (1991) The bleeding time does not predict surgical bleeding. Blood 77:2547–2552

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Peterson P, Hayes TE, Arkin CF, Bovill EG, Fairweather RB, Rock WA Jr et al (1998) The preoperative bleeding time test lacks clinical benefit. Arch Surg 133:134–139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Benedict CR, Ryan J, Wolitzky B, Ramos R, Gerlach M, Tijburg P et al (1991) Active site-blocked factor IXa prevents intravascular thrombus formation in the coronary vasculature without inhibiting extravascular coagulation in a canine thrombosis model. J Clin Invest 88:1760–1765

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Thiagarajan P, Benedict CR (1997) Inhibition of arterial thrombosis by recombinant annexin V in a rabbit carotid artery injury model. Circulation 96:2339–2347

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fenton DE (2009) Acute coronary syndrome. (eMedicine online). Updated August 6, 2009. Available at http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/756979-overview. Accessed 8 Feb 2010

  28. Falk E, Shah PK, Fuster V (1995) Coronary plaque disruption. Circulation 92:657–671

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lynch JJ Jr, Cook JJ, Sitko GR, Holahan MA, Ramjit DR, Mellott MJ et al (1995) Nonpeptide glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. 5. Antithrombotic effects of MK-0383. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 272:20–32

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kereiakes DJ, Kleiman NS, Ambrose J, Cohen M, Rodriguez S, Palabrica T et al (1996) Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-ranging study of tirofiban (MK-383) platelet IIb/IIIa blockade in high risk patients undergoing coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 27:536–542

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Moliterno DJ, Topol EJ (2002) The TARGET trial: hit or miss? Eur Heart J 23:835–837

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Soffer D, Moussa I, Karatepe M, Harjai KJ, Boura J, Dixon SR et al (2003) Suboptimal inhibition of platelet aggregation following tirofiban bolus in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for unstable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 91:872–875

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Daleen Struwig, medical writer, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, for assistance with technical and editorial preparation of the manuscript. The research was funded by departmental funds provided by the Department of Haematology and Cell Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walter J. Janse van Rensburg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Rensburg, W.J.J., Roodt, J.P., Lamprecht, S. et al. Tirofiban versus abciximab: tirofiban is administered at suboptimal dosages when evaluated in an arterial thrombosis model in non-human primates. Clin Exp Med 12, 257–263 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-011-0171-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-011-0171-4

Keywords

Navigation