Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A controlled trial of sputum induction and routine collection methods for TB diagnosis in a South African community

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The diagnostic yield of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) by sputum induction (SI) at the first point of contact with health services, conducted in all patients with suspected TB regardless of the ability to expectorate spontaneously, has not been evaluated. We compared the diagnostic yield of SI to routine sputum collection in a South African community setting. Ambulatory patients with suspected TB provided a ‘spot’ expectorated sputum sample, an SI sample by hypertonic (5 %) saline nebulization, and early morning expectorated sputum sample. The diagnostic yield of sputum smear microscopy and liquid culture (denominator all subjects with any positive Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture), and time-to-positivity of culture were compared between SI and expectorated samples. A total of 555 subjects completed the SI procedure, of whom 132 (24 %) were human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected. One hundred and twenty-nine samples (129, 23 %) were M. tuberculosis culture-positive. The time-to-positivity of Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) culture was shorter for SI (median difference 2 days, p = 0.63) and for early morning expectorated sputum (median difference 2 days, p = 0.02) compared to spot expectorated sputum. However, there was no difference in the culture-positive diagnostic yield between SI and spot expectorated sputum [difference +0.7 %; confidence interval (CI) −7.0 to +8.5 %, p = 0.82] or SI and early morning expectorated sputum (difference +4.7 %; CI −3.2 to +12.5 %, p = 0.20) for all subjects or for HIV-infected subjects. SI reduces the time to positive M. tuberculosis culture, but does not increase the rate of positive culture compared to routine expectorated sputum collection. SI cannot be recommended as the routine collection method at first contact among ambulatory patients with suspected TB in high-burden communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mase SR, Ramsay A, Ng V et al (2007) Yield of serial sputum specimen examinations in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 11(5):485–495

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Harries AD, Mphasa NB, Mundy C, Banerjee A, Kwanjana JH, Salaniponi FM (2000) Screening tuberculosis suspects using two sputum smears. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 4(1):36–40

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boehme CC, Nabeta P, Hillemann D et al (2010) Rapid molecular detection of tuberculosis and rifampin resistance. N Engl J Med 363(11):1005–1015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Peter JG, Cashmore TJ, Meldau R, Theron G, van Zyl-Smit R, Dheda K (2012) Diagnostic accuracy of induced sputum LAM ELISA for tuberculosis diagnosis in sputum-scarce patients. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 16(8):1108–1112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Parry CM, Kamoto O, Harries AD et al (1995) The use of sputum induction for establishing a diagnosis in patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis in Malawi. Tuber Lung Dis 76(1):72–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Menzies D (2003) Sputum induction: simpler, cheaper, and safer—but is it better? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 167(5):676–677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gonzalez-Angulo Y, Wiysonge CS, Geldenhuys H et al (2012) Sputum induction for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 31(7):1619–1630

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Paggiaro PL, Chanez P, Holz O et al (2002) Sputum induction. Eur Respir J Suppl 37:3s–8s

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schoch OD, Rieder P, Tueller C et al (2007) Diagnostic yield of sputum, induced sputum, and bronchoscopy after radiologic tuberculosis screening. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 175(1):80–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Saglam L, Akgun M, Aktas E (2005) Usefulness of induced sputum and fibreoptic bronchoscopy specimens in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. J Int Med Res 33(2):260–265

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McWilliams T, Wells AU, Harrison AC, Lindstrom S, Cameron RJ, Foskin E (2002) Induced sputum and bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. Thorax 57(12):1010–1014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Peter JG, Theron G, Pooran A, Thomas J, Pascoe M, Dheda K (2013) Comparison of two methods for acquisition of sputum samples for diagnosis of suspected tuberculosis in smear-negative or sputum-scarce people: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med 1(6):471–478

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Zar HJ, Hanslo D, Apolles P, Swingler G, Hussey G (2005) Induced sputum versus gastric lavage for microbiological confirmation of pulmonary tuberculosis in infants and young children: a prospective study. Lancet 365(9454):130–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hatherill M, Hawkridge T, Zar HJ et al (2009) Induced sputum or gastric lavage for community-based diagnosis of childhood pulmonary tuberculosis? Arch Dis Child 94(3):195–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Geldenhuys HD, Kleynhans W, Buckerfield N et al (2012) Safety and tolerability of sputum induction in adolescents and adults with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 31(4):529–537

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. English R (2008) Boland/Overberg region annual health status report 2007/08. Department of Health, Worcester

  17. Hesseling AC, Walzl G, Enarson DA et al (2010) Baseline sputum time to detection predicts month two culture conversion and relapse in non-HIV-infected patients. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 14(5):560–570

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bark CM, Thiel BA, Johnson JL (2012) Pretreatment time to detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in liquid culture is associated with relapse after therapy. J Clin Microbiol 50(2):538

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the following for the collection of data: 1,2Manshil Misra, 1,2William Kleynhans, 1,2Norma Buckerfield, 1,2Susan Rossouw, 1,2Elizabeth Filander, and the 1,2SATVI Induced Sputum team.

1South African Tuberculosis Vaccine Initiative (SATVI), Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine (IDM), and 2School of Child and Adolescent Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Contributions of authors

HDG and MH contributed towards the study planning, study conduct, and drafted the early versions of the manuscript. All other authors were involved in planning the study, implementation, and commenting on the draft manuscript. All authors approved the final version.

The study was approved by the University of Cape Town Human Research Ethics Committee (Human Subjects Assurance number 00001637) and written informed consent was obtained for participation. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), USA (grant number R01 AI75603-02).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to H. D. Geldenhuys or M. Hatherill.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Geldenhuys, H.D., Whitelaw, A., Tameris, M.D. et al. A controlled trial of sputum induction and routine collection methods for TB diagnosis in a South African community. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 33, 2259–2266 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-014-2198-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-014-2198-4

Keywords

Navigation