Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Multiple Features Target Cancellation (MFTC): an attentional visual conjunction search test. Normative values for the Italian population

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several studies, showing that attention disorders during encoding reduce later memory performance, have stressed the critical role of attention for the formation of durable memory traces. Accordingly, some studies suggest that attentive disturbances, together with declarative memory defects, can constitute the earliest cognitive disorders in Alzheimer’s disease. Therefore, the analysis of these disorders can contribute to identify different forms of dementia and to detect demented patients characterized by a faster cognitive decline. In this study, we report the normative data (gathered in a large Italian population) of a short test that assess the ability to detect stimuli characterized by a conjunction of features: the ‘Multiple Features Targets Cancellation’ task (MFTC). Our sample of 465 subjects was composed by urban and rural people. Multiple linear regression analyses revealed significant relation of false alarms with age and educational level, and of time of execution with age, educational level and gender. Regression analyses on accuracy scores did not show any significant correlation with demographics variables. Based on non-parametric techniques, cutoff scores were obtained on the corrected scores of the patients, and equivalent scores were derived for each measure. The MFTC task represents a useful tool that explores attentional disorders (and in particular conjunction search disturbances) and that could be helpful both in discriminating different forms of dementia and to detect mild cognitive impairment patients at risk of conversion to dementia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Perry RJ, Hodges JR (1999) Attention and executive deficits in Alzheimer’s disease. A critical review. Brain 122(Pt 3):383–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Porter G, Tales A, Troscianko T, Wilcock G, Haworth J, Leonards U (2010) New insights into feature and conjunction search: I. Evidence from pupil size, eye movements and ageing. Cortex 46(5):621–636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tales A, Haworth J, Nelson S, Snowden RJ, Wilcock G (2005) Abnormal visual search in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurocase 11(1):80–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Camicioli R, Howieson D, Lehman S, Kaye J (1997) Talking while walking: the effect of a dual task in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 48(4):955–958

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Perry RJ, Zeki S (2000) The neurology of saccades and covert shifts in spatial attention: an event-related fMRI study. Brain 123(Pt 11):2273–2288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Davis ET, Palmer J (2004) Visual search and attention: an overview. Spat Vis 17(4–5):249–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tales A, Butler SR, Fossey J, Gilchrist ID, Jones RW, Troscianko T (2002) Visual search in Alzheimer’s disease: a deficiency in processing conjunctions of features. Neuropsychologia 40(12):1849–1857

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Porter G, Leonards U, Wilcock G, Haworth J, Troscianko T, Tales A (2010) New insights into feature and conjunction search: II. Evidence from Alzheimer’s disease. Cortex 46(5):637–649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Foldi NS, Schaefer LA, White RE, Johnson R Jr, Berger JT, Carney MT, Macina LO (2005) Effects of graded levels of physical similarity and density on visual selective attention in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology 19(1):5–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sebastian MV, Menor J, Elosua MR (2006) Attentional dysfunction of the central executive in AD: evidence from dual task and perseveration errors. Cortex 42(7):1015–1020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gainotti G, Marra C, Villa G (2001) A double dissociation between accuracy and time of execution on attentional tasks in Alzheimer’s disease and multi-infarct dementia. Brain 124(Pt 4):731–738

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tabert MH, Manly JJ, Liu X, Pelton GH, Rosenblum S, Jacobs M, Zamora D, Goodkind M, Bell K, Stern Y, Devanand DP (2006) Neuropsychological prediction of conversion to Alzheimer disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Arch Gen Psychiatry 63(8):916–924

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Buccione I, Perri R, Carlesimo GA, Fadda L, Serra L, Scalmana S, Caltagirone C (2007) Cognitive and behavioural predictors of progression rates in Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Neurol 14(4):440–446

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fleisher AS, Sowell BB, Taylor C, Gamst AC, Petersen RC, Thal LJ (2007) Clinical predictors of progression to Alzheimer disease in amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Neurology 68(19):1588–1595

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Palmer K, Lupo F, Perri R, Salamone G, Fadda L, Caltagirone C, Musicco M, Cravello L (2011) Predicting disease progression in Alzheimer’s disease: the role of neuropsychiatric syndromes on functional and cognitive decline. J Alzheimers Dis 24(1):35–45

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Marra C, Silveri MC, Gainotti G (2000) Predictors of cognitive decline in the early stage of probable Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 11(4):212–218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Measso G, Caverzan F, Lebowitz BD, Crooke TH, Pirozzolo FJ, Amaducci LA, Massari D, Grigoletto F (1993) The mini-mental state examination. Normative study of an Italian random sample. Dev Neuropshychol 9:77–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Spinnler H, Tognoni G (1987) Standardizzazione e taratura di test neuropsicologici. Ital J Neurol Sci 8(Suppl 6):1–120

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rizzo M, Anderson SW, Dawson J, Myers R, Ball K (2000) Visual attention impairments in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 54(10):1954–1959

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Madden DJ, Whiting WL, Cabeza R, Huettel SA (2004) Age-related preservation of top-down attentional guidance during visual search. Psychol Aging 19(2):304–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Solbakk AK, Fuhrmann Alpert G, Furst AJ, Hale LA, Oga T, Chetty S, Pickard N, Knight RT (2008) Altered prefrontal function with aging: insights into age-associated performance decline. Brain Res 1232:30–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gomez-Perez E, Ostrosky-Solis F (2006) Attention and memory evaluation across the life span: heterogeneous effects of age and education. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 28(4):477–494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cerella J (1985) Information processing rates in the elderly. Psychol Bull 98(1):67–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Salthouse TA (1996) The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychol Rev 103(3):403–428

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rush MC, Panek PE, Russell JE (1987) Cautiousness and visual selective attention performance among older adults. J Genet Psychol 148(2):225–235

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Watson DG, Maylor EA, Bruce LA (2005) Search, enumeration, and aging: eye movement requirements cause age-equivalent performance in enumeration but not in search tasks. Psychol Aging 20(2):226–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Whiting WL, Madden DJ, Pierce TW, Allen PA (2005) Searching from the top down: ageing and attentional guidance during singleton detection. Q J Exp Psychol A 58(1):72–97

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bell EC, Willson MC, Wilman AH, Dave S, Silverstone PH (2006) Males and females differ in brain activation during cognitive tasks. Neuroimage 30(2):529–538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rubia K, Hyde Z, Halari R, Giampietro V, Smith A (2010) Effects of age and sex on developmental neural networks of visual-spatial attention allocation. Neuroimage 51(2):817–827

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neuroscience Policlinico Gemelli, Center for Neuropsychological Research, Catholic University, l.go A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy

    C. Marra, G. Gainotti, E. Scaricamazza, C. Piccininni, M. Ferraccioli & D. Quaranta

Authors
  1. C. Marra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. Gainotti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. E. Scaricamazza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. C. Piccininni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. Ferraccioli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. D. Quaranta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Marra.

Appendix

Appendix

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marra, C., Gainotti, G., Scaricamazza, E. et al. The Multiple Features Target Cancellation (MFTC): an attentional visual conjunction search test. Normative values for the Italian population. Neurol Sci 34, 173–180 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-012-0975-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-012-0975-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation