Skip to main content
Log in

Percutaneous versus open repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Controversy exists regarding the optimal treatment for acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Conservative and surgical treatments have been reported with variable results and complications rates. The purpose of this study is to compare the postoperative clinical and functional results of percutaneous versus open repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures.

Materials and methods

We present 34 patients with acute Achilles tendon ruptures treated with open and percutaneous surgical repair. There were 15 patients who had open surgical repair and 19 patients who had percutaneous repair. The mean follow-up was 22 months (range 10–24 months) for the open repair group and 20 months (range 9–24 months) for the percutaneous repair group; no patient was lost to follow-up. Postoperative rehabilitation was the same for both groups. Wound healing, complications, ankle range of motion, and patients’ return to work, activity level, weight-bearing, and subjective assessment of their treatment were recorded.

Results

No significant difference was observed with respect to any of the examined variables between the open and percutaneous repair groups. Tendon healing was observed in all patients of both groups by 7–9 weeks. The mean time of patients’ return to work was 7 weeks for the open repair group and 9 weeks for the percutaneous repair group. All patients were capable of full weight bearing by the 8th postoperative week time; the time to return to previous activities including non-contact sports was 5 months for both groups. All patients expressed satisfaction and graded their treatment as good. As expected, cosmetic appearance was significantly better in the percutaneous repair group. One patient who had open repair experienced skin incision pain and dysesthesia and graded his operation as fair. No patient experienced other complications such as re-rupture, infection, sural neuroma, or Achilles tendinitis within the period of this study.

Conclusions

The present study showed similarly successful clinical and functional results after both open and percutaneous repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures are similar. Cosmetic appearance is superior in the group of patients who had a percutaneous treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Raikin SM, Garras DN, Krapchev PV (2013) Achilles tendon injuries in a United States population. Foot Ankle Int 34(4):475–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Deangelis JP, Wilson KM, Cox CL, Diamond AB, Thomson AB (2009) Achilles tendon rupture in athletes. J Surg Orthop Adv 18(3):115–121

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Azar FM (2008) Rupture of muscles and tendons. Achilles tendon injuries. In: Canale ST, Beaty JH (eds) Campbell’s operative orthopaedics, vol 3, 11th edn. Mosby Elsevier, China, pp 2748–2753

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cretnik A, Kosanovic M, Smrkolj V (2004) Percutaneous suturing of the ruptured Achilles tendon under local anesthesia. J Foot Ankle Surg 43(2):72–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Garras DN, Raikin SM, Bhat SB, Taweel N, Karanjia H (2012) MRI is unnecessary for diagnosing acute Achilles tendon ruptures: clinical diagnostic criteria. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(8):2268–2273

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Feldbrin Z, Hendel D, Lipkin A, Zin D, Schorr L (2010) Achilles tendon rupture and our experience with the Achillon device. Isr Med Assoc J 12(10):609–612

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Davies MS, Solan M (2009) Minimal incision techniques for acute Achilles repair. Foot Ankle Clin 14(4):685–697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jiang N, Wang B, Chen A, Dong F, Yu B (2012) Operative versus nonoperative treatment for acute Achilles tendon rupture: a meta-analysis based on current evidence. Int Orthop 36(4):765–773

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wilkins R, Bisson LJ (2012) Operative versus nonoperative management of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Am J Sports Med 40(9):2154–2160

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chiodo CP, Glazebrook M, Bluman EM, Cohen BE, Femino JE, Giza E, Watters WC 3rd, Goldberg MJ, Keith M, Haralson RH III, Turkelson CM, Wies JL, Raymond L, Anderson S, Boyer K, Sluka P (2010) Diagnosis and treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 18(8):503–510

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Olsson N, Nilsson-Helander K, Karlsson J, Eriksson BI, Thomee R, Faxen E, Silbernagel KG (2011) Major functional deficits persist 2 years after acute Achilles tendon rupture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(8):1385–1393

    Google Scholar 

  12. Horstmann T, Lukas C, Merk J, Brauner T, Mundermann A (2012) Deficits 10-years after Achilles tendon repair. Int J Sports Med 33(6):474–479

    Google Scholar 

  13. Khan RJ, Fick D, Keogh A, Crawford J, Brammar T, Parker M (2005) Treatment of acute achilles tendon ruptures. A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(10):2202–2210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cetti R, Christensen SE, Ejsted R, Jensen NM, Jorgensen U (1993) Operative versus nonoperative treatment of Achilles tendon rupture. A prospective randomized study and review of the literature. Am J Sports Med 21(6):791–799

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McMahon SE, Smith TO, Hing CB. A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing conventional to minimally invasive approaches for repair of an Achilles tendon rupture. Foot Ankle Surg 17(4):211–217

  16. Saxena A, Maffulli N, Nguyen A, Li A (2008) Wound complications from surgeries pertaining to the Achilles tendon: an analysis of 219 surgeries. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 98(2):95–101

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Webb JM, Bannister GC (1999) Percutaneous repair of the ruptured tendo Achillis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81(5):877–880

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Maes R, Copin G, Averous C (2006) Is percutaneous repair of the Achilles tendon a safe technique? A study of 124 cases. Acta Orthop Belg 72(2):179–183

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Thompson TC (1962) A test for rupture of the tendo achillis. Acta Orthop Scand 32:461–465

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Krackow KA, Thomas SC, Jones LC (1986) A new stitch for ligament-tendon fixation. Brief note. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68(5):764–766

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ma GW, Griffith TG (1977) Percutaneous repair of acute closed ruptured Achilles tendon: a new technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 128:247–255

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Talbot JC, Williams GT, Bismil Q, Shaw DL, Schilders E (2012) Results of accelerated postoperative rehabilitation using novel “suture frame” repair of Achilles tendon rupture. J Foot Ankle Surg 51(2):147–151

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M (1994) Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 15(7):349–353

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Maffulli N, Longo UG, Ronga M, Khanna A, Denaro V (2010) Favorable outcome of percutaneous repair of Achilles tendon ruptures in the elderly. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(4):1039–1046

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Movin T, Ryberg A, McBride DJ, Maffulli N (2005) Acute rupture of the Achilles tendon. Foot Ankle Clin 10(2):331–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Carmont MR, Heaver C, Pradhan A, Mei-Dan O, Gravare Silbernagel K (2013) Surgical repair of the ruptured Achilles tendon: the cost-effectiveness of open versus percutaneous repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(6):1361–1368

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kolodziej L, Bohatyrewicz A, Kromuszczynska J, Jezierski J, Biedron M (2013) Efficacy and complications of open and minimally invasive surgery in acute Achilles tendon rupture: a prospective randomised clinical study—preliminary report. Int Orthop 37(4):625–629

    Google Scholar 

  28. Guillo S, Del Buono A, Dias M, Denaro V, Maffulli N (2013) Percutaneous repair of acute ruptures of the tendo Achillis. Surgeon 11(1):14–19

    Google Scholar 

  29. Blankstein A, Israeli A, Dudkiewicz I, Chechik A, Ganel A (2007) Percutaneous Achilles tendon repair combined with real-time sonography. Isr Med Assoc J 9(2):83–85

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Delponte P, Potier L, de Poulpiquet P, Buisson P (1992) Treatment of subcutaneous ruptures of the Achilles tendon by percutaneous tenorrhaphy. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 78(6):404–407

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Soubeyrand M, Serra-Tosio G, Campagna R, Molina V, Sitbon P, Biau DJ (2010) Intraoperative ultrasonography during percutaneous Achilles tendon repair. Foot Ankle Int 31(12):1069–1074

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Goren D, Ayalon M, Nyska M (2005) Isokinetic strength and endurance after percutaneous and open surgical repair of Achilles tendon ruptures. Foot Ankle Int 26(4):286–290

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rosso C, Vavken P, Polzer C, Buckland DM, Studler U, Weisskopf L, Lottenbach M, Muller AM, Valderrabano V (2013) Long-term outcomes of muscle volume and Achilles tendon length after Achilles tendon ruptures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(6):1369–1377

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lim J, Dalal R, Waseem M (2001) Percutaneous vs. open repair of the ruptured Achilles tendon—a prospective randomized controlled study. Foot Ankle Int 22(7):559–568

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ceccarelli F, Berti L, Giuriati L, Romagnoli M, Giannini S (2007) Percutaneous and minimally invasive techniques of Achilles tendon repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 458:188–193

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Carmont MR, Maffulli N (2008) Modified percutaneous repair of ruptured Achilles tendon. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16(2):199–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wong J, Barrass V, Maffulli N (2002) Quantitative review of operative and nonoperative management of Achilles tendon ruptures. Am J Sports Med 30(4):565–575

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Guillo S, Del Buono A, Dias M, Denaro V, Maffulli N (2013) Percutaneous repair of acute ruptures of the tendo Achillis. Surgeon 11(1):14–19

    Google Scholar 

  39. Nestorson J, Movin T, Moller M, Karlsson J (2000) Function after Achilles tendon rupture in the elderly: 25 patients older than 65 years followed for 3 years. Acta Orthop Scand 71(1):64–68

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have any financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence (bias) their work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas F. Mavrogenis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karabinas, P.K., Benetos, I.S., Lampropoulou-Adamidou, K. et al. Percutaneous versus open repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24, 607–613 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1350-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1350-7

Keywords

Navigation