Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How is the trachea at risk of injury from pedicle screw insertion in proximal thoracic curve of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The rotation or translation of vertebrae in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients could cause the relative migrations of surrounding vital structures and lead to smaller safe zones for pedicle screw insertion. This study aimed to determine the changed relative position of trachea to spine in the proximal thoracic curve (T1–T4) and to analyze the potential risks of tracheal injuries from pedicle screw insertions in AIS patients.

Methods

Twenty-three patients with complete proximal thoracic curve (CPT group), 25 patients with fractional proximal thoracic curve (FPT group) and 19 normal subjects with a straight spine (normal group) were included. Axial computed tomography images from T1 to T4 level were obtained to evaluate trachea–vertebral distance (TVD, the closest distance between trachea and vertebral body) and trachea–vertebral angle (TVA, defined as 0° when the trachea was located directly laterally to the left and 180° when directly laterally to the right). The extension line of pedicle axis could cross the anterior wall of vertebra and the posterior wall of the trachea at two points when the trachea was located in the trajectory of the screw passage. If the distance between the two points was less than 5 mm, the trachea was considered to be at a potential risk of injury. The percentages of vulnerable trachea were calculated at each level.

Results

The TVA in the CPT group was significantly larger than that in the FPT group and in the normal group, while the TVA in the FPT group was significantly larger than that in the normal group at the T2–T4 level. The TVD in the FPT group was significantly smaller than that in the CPT group and in the normal group at each level, while the TVD in the CPT group was significantly smaller than that in the normal group at the T2 and T3 levels. No trachea was found to be at risk from screw insertion on both sides in both the CPT group and the normal group. However, it was at a high risk of injury from anterior cortex penetration during right screw insertion in the FPT group. The percentage of trachea at risk from right screw insertion was 40 % at T1 level, 92 % at T2 level, 100 % at both T3 and T4 levels.

Conclusions

This CT-based study demonstrates that the FPT curve has a smaller safe zone with respect to tracheal injury during screw insertion. Spine surgeons should choose the appropriate screw length to avoid anterior wall perforation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cardoso MJ, Helgeson MD, Paik H, Dmitriev AE, Lehman RA Jr, Rosner MK (2010) Structures at risk from pedicle screws in the proximal thoracic spine: computed tomography evaluation. Spine J 10:905–909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Di Silvestre M, Bakaloudis G, Lolli F, Vommaro F, Martikos K, Parisini P (2008) Posterior fusion only for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis of more than 80 degrees: pedicle screws versus hybrid instrumentation. Eur Spine J 17:1336–1349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ebraheim NA, Jabaly G, Xu R, Yeasting RA (1997) Anatomic relations of the thoracic pedicle to the adjacent neural structures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:1553–1556 (discussion 1557)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Guo X, Chau WW, Chan YL, Cheng JC (2003) Relative anterior spinal overgrowth in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Results of disproportionate endochondral-membranous bone growth. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:1026–1031

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hicks JM, Singla A, Shen FH, Arlet V (2010) Complications of pedicle screw fixation in scoliosis surgery: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:E465–E470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ilharreborde B, Even J, Lefevre Y, Fitoussi F, Presedo A, Souchet P, Pennecot GF, Mazda K (2008) How to determine the upper level of instrumentation in Lenke types 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective study of 132 patients. J Pediatr Orthop 28:733–739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jiang J, Mao S, Zhao Q, Liu Z, Qian B, Zhu F, Qiu Y (2012) Different proximal thoracic curve patterns have different relative positions of esophagus to spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a computed tomography study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:193–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Krismer M, Bauer R, Sterzinger W (1992) Scoliosis correction by Cotrel–Dubousset instrumentation. The effect of derotation and three dimensional correction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 17:S263–S269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuklo TR, Lehman RA Jr, Lenke LG (2005) Structures at risk following anterior instrumented spinal fusion for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(Suppl):S58–S64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuklo TR, Lenke LG, Graham EJ, Won DS, Sweet FA, Blanke KM, Bridwell KH (2002) Correlation of radiographic, clinical, and patient assessment of shoulder balance following fusion versus nonfusion of the proximal thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:2013–2020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuklo TR, Lenke LG, O’Brien MF, Lehman RA Jr, Polly DW Jr, Schroeder TM (2005) Accuracy and efficacy of thoracic pedicle screws in curves more than 90 degrees. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:222–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuklo TR, Potter BK, Schroeder TM, O’Brien MF (2006) Comparison of manual and digital measurements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:1240–1246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lamartina C, Petruzzi M, Macchia M, Stradiotti P, Zerbi A (2011) Role of rod diameter in comparison between only screws versus hooks and screws in posterior instrumentation of thoracic curve in idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 1):S85–S89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Li G, Lv G, Passias P, Kozanek M, Metkar US, Liu Z, Wood KB, Rehak L, Deng Y (2010) Complications associated with thoracic pedicle screws in spinal deformity. Eur Spine J 19:1576–1584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rose PS, Lenke LG (2007) Classification of operative adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: treatment guidelines. Orthop Clin North Am 38:521–529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Samdani AF, Ranade A, Sciubba DM, Cahill PJ, Antonacci MD, Clements DH, Betz RR (2010) Accuracy of free-hand placement of thoracic pedicle screws in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: how much of a difference does surgeon experience make? Eur Spine J 19:91–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sarlak AY, Buluc L, Sarisoy HT, Memisoglu K, Tosun B (2008) Placement of pedicle screws in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis: a magnetic resonance imaging analysis of screw placement relative to structures at risk. Eur Spine J 17:657–662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sarlak AY, Tosun B, Atmaca H, Sarisoy HT, Buluc L (2009) Evaluation of thoracic pedicle screw placement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 18:1892–1897

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Upasani VV, Tis J, Bastrom T, Pawelek J, Marks M, Lonner B, Crawford A, Newton PO (2007) Analysis of sagittal alignment in thoracic and thoracolumbar curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: how do these two curve types differ? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:1355–1359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vaccaro AR, Rizzolo SJ, Balderston RA, Allardyce TJ, Garfin SR, Dolinskas C, An HS (1995) Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part II: an anatomical and radiographic assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1200–1206

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to acknowledge the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China (BK2011092).

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Spine Surgery, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Zhongshan Road 321, Nanjing, 210008, China

    Bangping Qian, Jun Jiang, Feng Zhu, Zezhang Zhu, Zhen Liu & Yong Qiu

Authors
  1. Bangping Qian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jun Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Feng Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zezhang Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhen Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yong Qiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Qiu.

Additional information

B. Qian and J. Jiang contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Qian, B., Jiang, J., Zhu, F. et al. How is the trachea at risk of injury from pedicle screw insertion in proximal thoracic curve of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients?. Eur Spine J 22, 338–344 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2520-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2520-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation