Skip to main content
Log in

Possibility Theoretic Clustering and its Preliminary Application to Large Image Segmentation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rooted at the exponential possibility model recently developed by Tanaka and his colleagues, a new clustering criterion or concept is introduced and a possibility theoretic clustering algorithm is proposed. The new algorithm is characterized by a novel formulation and is distinctive in determining an appropriate number of clusters for a given dataset while obtaining a quality clustering result. The proposed algorithm can be easily implemented using an alternative minimization iterative procedure and its parameters can be effectively initialized by the Parzen window technique and Yager’s probability–possibility transformation. Our experimental results demonstrate its success in artificial datasets and large image segmentation. In order to reduce the complexity of large image segmentation, we propose to integrate the new clustering algorithm with a biased sampling procedure based on Epanechnikov kernel functions. As demonstrated by the preliminary experimental results, the possibility theoretic clustering is effective in image segmentation and its integration with a biased sampling procedure offers an attractive framework of large image processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aggrawal R, Gehrke J, Gunopulos D, Raghavan P (1998) Automatic subspace clustering of high dimensional data for data mining applications. In: Proceedings of 1998 ACM SIGMOD International Conference Management of Data, Seattle, Washington, pp 94–105

  2. Bezdek JC. (1981) Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithm. Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chung FL, Lee T (1994) Fuzzy competitive learning. Neural Netw 7(3):539–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cressie N (1993) Statistics for spatial data. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ester M, Kriegel HP, Sander J, Xu X. (1996) A density based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. Proceedings of International Conference Knowledge Discovery and Databases, pp 226–231

  6. Gentile C (2003) The robustness of the p-norm algorithms. Mach Learn 53:265–299

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Gokcay E, Principe JC (2002) Information theoretic clustering. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 24(2):158–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guo P (2001) Exponential possibilistic data analysis for operations research. Ph.D. thesis (Osaka Prefecture University)

  9. Guo P, Tanaka H (2001) Fuzzy DEA: A perceptual evaluation method. Fuzzy Sets Syst 119(1):149–160

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Jacas J, Recasons J The group of isometries of an indistinguishability operator. Fuzzy Sets Syst (to appear)

  11. Kollios G, Gunopulos D, Koudas N, et al. (2003) Efficient biased sampling for approximate clustering and outlier detection in large data sets. IEEE Trans Knowledge Data Eng 15(5):1170–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Krishnapuram R, Keller J (1993) A possibilistic approach to clustering. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 1(2):98–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Krishnapuram R, Keller J (1996) The possibilistic c-means algorithm: Insights and recommendations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 4(3):385–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Krishnapuram R, Frigui H, Nasraoui O (1995) Fuzzy and possibilistic shell clustering algorithms and their application to boundary detection and surface approximation–Part I. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 3(1):29–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Krishnapuram R, Frigui H, Nasraoui O (1995) Fuzzy and possibilistic shell clustering algorithms and their application to boundary detection and surface approximation–Part II. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 3(1):44–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Masulli F, Rovetta S (2002) Soft transition from probabilistic to possibilistic fuzzy clustering. DISI Technical Report No. DISI-TR-02–03, Italy

  17. Medasani S, Krishnapuram R (1994) Image thresholding via possibilistic clustering. Proceedings of NAFIPS/IFIS/NASA’94, pp.423–426,

  18. Pal NR, Bezdek JC (2002) Complexity reduction for “large image” processing. IEEE Trans on Systems, Man and Cybernetics–Part B. Cybernetics, 32(5):598–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rosenfeld A, Kak AC (1982) Digital picture processing. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Scott D (1992) Multivariate density estimation: theory, practice and visualization. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Sugihara K, Tanaka H (2001) Interval evaluations in the analytic hierarchy process by possibility analysis. Comput Intell 17(3):567–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tanaka H, Guo P (1999) Possibilistic data analysis for operations research. Physica-Verlag, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Tanaka H, Ishibuchi H (1993) Evidence theory of exponential possibility distributions. Int J Approximate Reasoning 8:123–140

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang ST (1998) Fuzzy systems, fuzzy neural networks and their programming. Press of Shanghai Sci and Tech.

  25. Wand MP, Jones MC (1995) Kernel smoothing. Chapman and Hall, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang ST, Jiang H, Lu HJ (2002) A new integrated clustering algorithm GFC and switching regressions. Pattern Recognit Artif Intell 16(4):433–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang ST et al (2004) Gene selection for cancer classification using the new classification algorithm. Chinese J Bioinformatics 4(3):65–77

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wang ST et al (2004) Robust maximum entropy clustering algorithm RMEC and its labeling for outliers. Eng Sci China 6(3):70–83

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wang ST, Chung FL, Shen HB, Zhu RQ (2004) Note on the relationship between probabilistic and fuzzy clustering. Int J Soft Comput 8(5):366–369

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yager RR (2002) On the instantiation of possibility distributions. Fuzzy Sets Syst 128:261–266

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Yan P et al. (2001) Neurocomputation and evolutionary strategies. Press of Tsinghua University

  32. Zadeh LA (1978) Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1:3–28

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shitong Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chung, Fl., Wang, S., Xu, M. et al. Possibility Theoretic Clustering and its Preliminary Application to Large Image Segmentation. Soft Comput 11, 103–113 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-006-0056-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-006-0056-8

Keywords

Navigation