Skip to main content
Log in

Risk factors of residual or recurrent tumor in patients with a tumor-positive resection margin after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In cases with a tumor-positive resection margin after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer (EGC), not all patients are found to have residual or recurrent tumor. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors associated with residual/recurrent tumor in patients with incomplete endoscopic resection of EGC.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic resection of EGC at a single institution in South Korea. Patients with a tumor-positive resection margin in the specimen were divided into two groups, with and without residual/recurrent tumor, and the clinicopathologic characteristics were compared.

Results

A total of 102 patients with a tumor-positive lateral or vertical resection margin after endoscopic mucosal resection (n = 10) or submucosal dissection (n = 92) were enrolled. Overall, the rate of residual/recurrent tumor was 33.3 % (34/102): 17 residual tumors in 46 patients who immediately underwent additional endoscopic or surgical resection, and 17 recurrent tumors in 56 patients who were initially followed up with regular endoscopy during a median period of 17 (range = 2–70) months. Univariate analysis showed that the presence of ulcer, the direction of the tumor-positive resection margin, and length of lateral resection margin involvement by the tumor were associated with the incidence of residual/recurrent tumor. In multivariate analysis, total length (cm) of lateral resection margin involvement was the only independent risk factor for residual/recurrent tumor (OR 2.05; 95 % CI 1.22–3.44, p = 0.006).

Conclusions

Patients with extensive tumor involvement of a lateral resection margin after endoscopic resection of EGC should consider additional endoscopic or surgical resection due to a high risk of residual/recurrent tumor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Takenaka R, Kawahara Y, Okada H, Hori K, Inoue M, Kawano S, Tanioka D, Tsuzuki T, Yagi S, Kato J, Uemura M, Ohara N, Yoshino T, Imagawa A, Fujiki S, Takata R, Yamamoto K (2008) Risk factors associated with local recurrence of early gastric cancers after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 68:887–894

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jang JS, Choi SR, Qureshi W, Kim MC, Kim SJ, Jeung JS, Han SY, Noh MH, Lee JH, Lee SW, Baek YH, Kim SH, Choi PJ (2009) Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection in gastric neoplastic lesions at a single institution in South Korea. Scand J Gastroenterol 44:1315–1322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Isomoto H, Shikuwa S, Yamaguchi N, Fukuda E, Ikeda K, Nishiyama H, Ohnita K, Mizuta Y, Shiozawa J, Kohno S (2009) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a large-scale feasibility study. Gut 58:331–336

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Isomoto H, Ohnita K, Yamaguchi N, Fukuda E, Ikeda K, Nishiyama H, Akiyama M, Ozawa E, Nakao K, Kohno S, Shikuwa S (2010) Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection in elderly patients with early gastric cancer. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 22:311–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ryu KW, Choi IJ, Doh YW, Kook MC, Kim CG, Park HJ, Lee JH, Lee JS, Lee JY, Kim YW, Bae JM (2007) Surgical indication for non-curative endoscopic resection in early gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14:3428–3434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jung H, Bae JM, Choi MG, Noh JH, Sohn TS, Kim S (2011) Surgical outcome after incomplete endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric cancer. Br J Surg 98:73–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bae SY, Jang TH, Min BH, Lee JH, Rhee PL, Rhee JC, Kim JJ (2012) Early additional endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with positive lateral resection margins after initial endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 75:432–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Song KY, Hyung WJ, Kim HH, Han SU, Cho GS, Ryu SW, Lee HJ, Kim MC (2008) Is gastrectomy mandatory for all residual or recurrent gastric cancer following endoscopic resection? A large-scale Korean multi-center study. J Surg Oncol 98:6–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ono H, Kondo H, Gotoda T, Shirao K, Yamaguchi H, Saito D, Hosokawa K, Shimoda T, Yoshida S (2001) Endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of early gastric cancer. Gut 48:225–229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kojima T, Parra-Blanco A, Takahashi H, Fujita R (1998) Outcome of endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer: review of the Japanese literature. Gastrointest Endosc 48:550–554 discussion 554–555

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Inoue H, Takeshita K, Hori H, Muraoka Y, Yoneshima H, Endo M (1993) Endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap-fitted panendoscope for esophagus, stomach, and colon mucosal lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 39:58–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kang HY, Kim SG, Kim JS, Jung HC, Song IS (2010) Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for undifferentiated early gastric cancer. Surgical Endosc 24:509–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (1998) Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma - 2nd English Edition. Gastric Cancer 1:10–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nakamura Y, Yasuoka H, Tsujimoto M, Kurozumi K, Nakahara M, Nakao K, Kakudo K (2006) Importance of lymph vessels in gastric cancer: a prognostic indicator in general and a predictor for lymph node metastasis in early stage cancer. J Clin Pathol 59:77–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Soetikno R, Kaltenbach T, Yeh R, Gotoda T (2005) Endoscopic mucosal resection for early cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract. J Clin Oncol 23:4490–4498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Choi J, Kim SG, Im JP, Kim JS, Jung HC, Song IS (2011) Endoscopic prediction of tumor invasion depth in early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 73:917–927

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Choi J, Kim SG, Im JP, Kim JS, Jung HC, Song IS (2010) Is endoscopic ultrasonography indispensable in patients with early gastric cancer prior to endoscopic resection? Surg Endosc 24:3177–3185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gotoda T, Yamamoto H, Soetikno RM (2006) Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer. J Gastroenterol 41:929–942

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yamaguchi N, Isomoto H, Fukuda E, Ikeda K, Nishiyama H, Akiyama M, Ozawa E, Ohnita K, Hayashi T, Nakao K, Kohno S, Shikuwa S (2009) Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer by indication criteria. Digestion 80:173–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Park JC, Lee SK, Seo JH, Kim YJ, Chung H, Shin SK, Lee YC (2010) Predictive factors for local recurrence after endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer: long-term clinical outcome in a single-center experience. Surgical Endosc 24:2842–2849

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Drs. H. Yoon, S. G. Kim, J. Choi, J. P. Im, J. S. Kim, W. H. Kim, and H. C. Jung have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sang Gyun Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yoon, H., Kim, S.G., Choi, J. et al. Risk factors of residual or recurrent tumor in patients with a tumor-positive resection margin after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 27, 1561–1568 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2627-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2627-3

Keywords

Navigation