Skip to main content
Log in

An industrial application of symbolic model checking

The TWIN elevator case study

  • Reguläre Beiträge
  • Published:
Informatik - Forschung und Entwicklung

Abstract

Model checking techniques are recognized to provide reliable and copious results. Instead of examining a few cases only – as it is done in testing – model checking includes the whole state space in mathematical proofs of correctness. Yet, this completeness is seen as a drawback as the state explosion problem is hard to handle. In our industrial case study, we apply automated model checking techniques to an innovative elevator system, the TWIN by ThyssenKrupp. By means of abstraction and nondeterminism, we cope with runtime behaviour and achieve to efficiently prove our specification’s validity. The elevator’s safety requirements are exhaustively expressed in temporal logic along with real-world and algorithmic prerequisites, consistency properties, and fairness constraints. Beyond verifying system safety for an actual installation, our case study demonstrates the rewarding applicability of model checking at an industrial scale.

Zusammenfassung

Model-Checking-Techniken liefern anerkanntermaßen zuverlässige und umfassende Ergebnisse. Im Gegensatz zu Testverfahren werden nicht nur Einzelfälle untersucht, sondern der gesamte Zustandsraum fließt in die mathematische Korrektheitsprüfung ein, was jedoch aufgrund schwer handhabbarer Zustandsexplosion als Nachteil angesehen wird. In unserer Industrie-Fallstudie, der Anwendung automatisierter Model Checking Techniken auf das innovative TWIN Aufzugssystem von ThyssenKrupp, beweisen wir die Gültigkeit der Spezifikation bezüglich der Anforderungen; Effizienz wird durch Abstraktion und Nichtdeterminismus erreicht. Die Sicherheitsanforderungen an den Aufzug sind vollständig in Temporallogik ausgedrückt, ebenso wie algorithmische und technische Voraussetzungen, Konsistenzbedingungen und Fairness-Eigenschaften. Unser Fallbeispiel weist nicht nur die Betriebssicherheit eines Produktivsystems nach, sondern unterstreicht die lohnende Anwendbarkeit von Model Checking Techniken im industriellen Maßstab.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bäumler S, Balser M, Dunets A, Reif W, Schmitt J (2006) Verification of Medical Guidelines by Model Checking – A Case Study http://spinroot.com/spin/Workshops/ws06/027.pdf

  2. Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationsgesellschaft (BSI) (2005) Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation, Part 3. http://www.bsi.de/cc/ccpart3v2_3.pdf

  3. Burch JR, Clarke EM, Long DE (1994) Symbolic Model Checking for Sequential Circuit Verification. IEEE Trans Comp Aided Design Integr Circ Syst 13:401–424

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chan W, Anderson RJ, Beame P, Burns S, Modugno F, Notkin D, Reese JD (1998) Model checking large software specifications. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 24(7):498–520

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cimatti A, Clarke EM, Giunchiglia F, Roveri M (2000) NuSMV: a new symbolic model verifier. In: Halbwachs N, Peled D (eds) International Conference on Computer-Aided Verification (CAV’99), LNCS, vol 1633, pp 495–499, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg

  6. Cimatti A (2000). Industrial Applications of Model Checking. In: Cassez F, Jard C, Rozoy B, Ryan MD (eds.) Modeling and Verification of Parallel Processes (MOVEP’00), LNCS, vol. 2067, pp 153–167, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg

  7. Clarke EM, Grumberg O, Peled DA (1999) Model Checking. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA

  8. Helke S, Kammüller F (2005) Property Preserving Abstraction for Statecharts. In: 25th IFIP WG 6.1 International Conference on Formal Techniques for Networked and Distributed Systems, FORTE 2005, LNCS, vol. 3731, pp 305–319, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg

  9. Holzmann GJ (1991) Design and Verification of Computer Protocols. Prentice Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  10. Janssen W, Mateescu R, Mauw S, Fennema P, van der Stappen P (1999) Model checking for managers. In: Proceedings Theoretical and Practical Aspects of SPIN Model Checking, LNCS, vol 1680, pp 92–107, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg

  11. Lamport L (1994) The temporal logic of actions. ACM Trans Prog Lang Syst 16:872–923 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/177492.177726

    Google Scholar 

  12. Larsen K G, Steffen B, Weise C (1997) Continuous Modelling of Real Time and Hybrid Systems: From Concepts to Tools. Int J Softw Tools Technol Transf 1:64–85

  13. Manna Z, Pnueli A (1991) The Temporal Logic of Reactive and Concurrent Systems: Specification. Springer-Verlag, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. McMillan KL (1992) Symbolic Model Checking – an Approach to the State Explosion Problem. School of Computer Science, Pittsburgh PA, Carnegie Mellon University

  15. McMillan KL (1995) Symbolic Model Checking. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  16. nuSMV (1999) NuSMV examples: the collection. http://nusmv.irst.itc.it/examples/examples.html

  17. Preibusch S (2006) http://preibusch.de/projects/TWIN/

  18. ThyssenKrupp (2005) Safe distance – Four-level safety concept. http://twin-elevator.com/Safe_distance.353.0.html?L=1

  19. ThyssenKrupp (2005) Higher performance. http://twin-elevator.com/New_buildings.368.0.html?L=1

  20. Uppsala University, Department of Information Technology (2006) UPPAAL. http://www.uppaal.com/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florian Kammüller.

Additional information

CR subject classification

D.2.4; F.3.1; J.7 ; C.3

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kammüller, F., Preibusch, S. An industrial application of symbolic model checking . Informatik Forsch. Entw. 22, 95–108 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00450-007-0032-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00450-007-0032-2

Keywords

Schlagworte

Navigation