Skip to main content
Log in

Specificity, rank preference, and the colonization of a non-native host plant by the Melissa blue butterfly

  • Plant-animal interactions - Original research
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Animals often express behavioral preferences for different types of food or other resources, and these preferences can evolve or shift following association with novel food types. Shifts in preference can involve at least two phenomena: a change in rank preference or a change in specificity. The former corresponds to a change in the order in which hosts are preferred, while a shift in specificity can be an increase in the tendency to utilize multiple hosts. These possibilities have been examined in relatively few systems that include extensive population-level replication. The Melissa blue butterfly, Lycaeides melissa, has colonized exotic alfalfa, Medicago sativa, throughout western North America. We assayed the host preferences of 229 females from ten populations associated with novel and native hosts. In four out of five native-associated populations, a native host was preferred over the exotic host, while preference for a native host characterized only two out of five of the alfalfa-associated populations. Across all individuals from alfalfa-associated populations, there appears to have been a decrease in specificity: females from these populations lay fewer eggs on the native host and more eggs on the exotic relative to females from native-host populations. However, females from alfalfa-associated populations did not lay more eggs on a third plant species, which suggests that preferences for specific hosts in this system can potentially be gained and lost independently. Geographic variation in oviposition preference in L. melissa highlights the value of surveying a large number of populations when studying the evolution of a complex behavioral trait.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barron AB (2001) The life and death of Hopkins’ host-selection principle. J Insect Behav 14:725–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll SP, Dingle H (1996) The biology of post-invasion events. Biol Conserv 78:207–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conover WJ (1999) Practical nonparametric statistics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtney SP, Chen GK, Gardner A (1989) A general model for individual host selection. Oikos: 55:55–65

  • Davis JM (2008) Patterns of variation in the influence of natal experience on habitat choice. Q Rev Biol 83:363–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Egan SP, Funk DJ (2006) Individual advantages to ecological specialization: insights on cognitive constraints from three conspecific taxa. Proc R Soc B 273:843–848

    Google Scholar 

  • Fordyce JA (2010) Host shifts and evolutionary radiations of butterflies. Proc R Soc B 277:3735–3743

    Google Scholar 

  • Fordyce JA, Nice CC (2003) Variation in butterfly egg adhesion: adaptation to local host plant senescence characteristics? Ecol Lett 6:23–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fordyce JA, Gompert Z, Forister ML, Nice CC (2011) A hierarchical approach to ecological count data: a flexible tool for ecologists. PLoS ONE 6:e26785

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forister ML (2008) Experimental design and the outcome of preference-performance assays, with examples from Mitoura butterflies (lycaenidae). J Lepid Soc 62:99–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Forister ML, Ehmer AG, Futuyma DJ (2007) The genetic architecture of a niche: variation and covariation in host use traits in the Colorado potato beetle. J Evol Biol 20:985–996

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forister ML, Nice CC, Fordyce JA, Gompert Z (2009) Host range evolution is not driven by the optimization of larval performance: the case of Lycaeides melissa (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) and the colonization of alfalfa. Oecologia 160:551–561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forister ML, Gompert A, Nice CC, Forister ML, Fordyce JA (2011) Ant association facilitates the evolution of diet breadth in a lycaenid butterfly. Proc R Soc B 278:1539–1547

    Google Scholar 

  • Gompert Z, Fordyce JA, Forister ML, Shapiro AM, Nice CC (2006) Homoploid hybrid speciation in an extreme habitat. Science 314:1923–1925

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gompert Z, Lucas LK, Fordyce JA, Forister ML, Nice CC (2010) Secondary contact between Lycaeides idas and L. melissa in the Rocky Mountains: extensive admixture and a patchy hybrid zone. Mol Ecol 19:3171–3192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gripenberg S, Mayhew PJ, Parnell M, Roslin T (2010) A meta-analysis of preference-performance relationships in phytophagous insects. Ecol Lett 13:383–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorne DJ, Via S (2001) Genetic linkage of ecological specialization and reproductive isolation in pea aphids. Nature 412:904–907

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaenike J (1990) Host specialization in phytophagous insects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 21:243–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahner JP, Bonilla MM, Badik KJ, Shapiro AM, Forister ML (2011) Use of exotic hosts by Lepidoptera: widespread species colonize more novel hosts. Evolution 65:2719–2724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janz N (2011) Ehrlich and Raven revisited: mechanisms underlying codiversification of plants and enemies. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 42:71–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janz N, Nylin S (2008) The oscillation hypothesis of host-plant range and speciation. In: Tilmon KJ (ed) Specialization, speciation and radiation: the evolutionary biology of herbivorous insects. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 203–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Janz N, Soderlind L, Nylin S (2009) No effect of larval experience on adult host preferences in Polygonia c-album (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): on the persistence of Hopkins’ host selection principle. Ecol Entomol 34:50–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeler MS, Chew FS (2008) Escaping an evolutionary trap: preference and performance of a native insect on an exotic invasive host. Oecologia 156:559–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linn C, Feder JL, Nojima S, Dambroski HR, Berlocher SH, Roelofs W (2003) Fruit odor discrimination and sympatric host race formation in Rhagoletis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:11490–11493

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas LK, Fordyce JA, Nice CC (2008) Patterns of genitalic morphology around suture zones in North American Lycaeides (Lepidoptera : Lycaenidae): Implications for taxonomy and historical biogeography. Ann Entomol Soc Am 101:172–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride CS (2007) Rapid evolution of smell and taste receptor genes during host specialization in Drosophila sechellia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:4996–5001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mercader R, Scriber J (2007) Diversification of host use in two polyphagous butterflies: differences in oviposition specificity or host rank hierarchy? Entomol Exp Appl 125:89–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercader RJ, Aardema ML, Scriber JM (2009) Hybridization leads to host-use divergence in a polyphagous butterfly sibling species pair. Oecologia 158:651–662

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Michaud R, Lehman WF, Rumbaugh MD (1988) World distribution and historical developments. In: Hanson AA, Barnes DK, Hill RR (eds) Alfalfa and alfalfa improvement, vol 29. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 25–56

  • Nice CC, Fordyce JA, Shapiro AM, Ffrench-Constant R (2002) Lack of evidence for reproductive isolation among ecologically specialised lycaenid butterflies. Ecol Entomol 27:702–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nylin S, Bergstrom A, Janz N (2000) Butterfly host plant choice in the face of possible confusion. J Insect Behav 13:469–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholl CF, Nice CC, Fordyce JA, Gompert Z, Forister ML (2012) Larval performance in the context of ecological diversification and speciation in Lycaeides butterflies. Int J Ecol. doi:10.1155/2012/242154

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer MC (1982) Quantification of host preference by manipulation of oviposition behavior in the butterfly Euphydryas editha. Oecologia 52:224–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer MC, Vasco D, Parmesan C, Thomas CD, Ng D (1992a) Distinguishing between preference and motivation in food choice: an example from insect oviposition. Anim Behav 44:463–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer MC, Ng D, Vasco D, Thomas CD (1992b) Rapidly evolving associations among oviposition preferences fail to constrain evolution of insect diet. Am Nat 139:9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer MC, Thomas CD, Parmesan C (1993) Rapid human-induced evolution of insect diet. Nature 366:681–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer MC, Thomas CD, Billington HL, Parmesan C (1994) Correlates of speed of evolution of host preference in a set of twelve populations of the butterfly Euphydryas editha. Ecoscience 1:107–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer MC, Stefanescu C, Pen I (2002) When random sampling does not work: standard design falsely indicates maladaptive host preferences in a butterfly. Ecol Lett 5:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer MC, Wee B, Hawkins S, Butcher M (2008) Rapid natural and anthropogenic diet evolution: three examples from checkerspot butterflies. In: Tilmon KJ (ed) Specialization, speciation, and radiation: the evolutionary biology of herbivorous insects. The University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 311–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, Van Der Linde A (2002) Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Method) 64:583–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabashnik BE (1983) Host range evolution: the shift from native legume hosts to alfalfa by the butterfly, Colias philodice eriphyle. Evolution 37:150–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JN (1998) The evolution of diet breadth: monophagy and polyphagy in swallowtail butterflies. J Evol Biol 11:563–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JN, Pellmyr O (1991) Evolution of oviposition behavior and host preference in Lepidoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 36:65–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tosh CR, Krause J, Ruxton GD (2009) Theoretical predictions strongly support decision accuracy as a major driver of ecological specialization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:5698–5702

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang PJ, Liu SS, Wang H, Zalucki MP (2007) The influence of early adult experience and larval food restriction on responses toward nonhost plants in moths. J Chem Ecol 33:1528–1541

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation: DEB-1020509 and DEB-1050726 to MLF; IOS-1021873 and DEB-1050355 to CCN; DEB-0614223 and DEB-1050947 to JAF; and DEB-1011173 to ZG. JPJ was supported by the graduate group in Ecology, Evolution and Conservation Biology at the University of Nevada, Reno. Thanks to Mike C. Singer for discussion and comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. L. Forister.

Additional information

Communicated by Konrad Fiedler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forister, M.L., Scholl, C.F., Jahner, J.P. et al. Specificity, rank preference, and the colonization of a non-native host plant by the Melissa blue butterfly. Oecologia 172, 177–188 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2476-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2476-8

Keywords

Navigation