Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A new pathway to classification of complex hand injuries: a clinical pilot testing using a new method of assessment

  • Handsurgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

All existing classifications, which are based on the severity of hand injuries, are being referred to facets of variety of hand injuries in general. A clear picture of all consequences of hand injuries would be apparent, if any kind of injury mechanism and occurrence of an injury would be identified and academically captured. Predictions regarding return to the former occupation and rehabilitation time would be possible with further study; 102 patients with different hand injuries were engaged in a pilot project using a specifically designed assessment sheet to achieve this purpose in the framework of a retrospective clinical testing within 1 year. Data were summarized and demonstrated graphically. Each category showed a picture of prior localization of the injury and its morphology. All categories show specific injury patterns. The choice of categories reflects the mechanisms of injury emphasized in literature. Furthermore, the mean DASH equivalents of one category were compared to the mean Hand Injury Severity Scoring (HISS) scores in order to get an initial idea of information on the degree of severity. A first impression of the potential of this assessment sheet has been obtained with regard to the above. With further study, we could evaluate the assessment sheet and try to create a classification of the grade of severity as well as prognostic values like return to the former occupation and rehabilitation time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Angermann P, Lohmann M (1993) Injuries to the hand and wrist. A study of 50,272 injuries. J Hand Surg Br 18:642–644

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Atroshi I, Rosberg HE (2001) Epidemiology of amputations and severe injuries of the hand. Hand Clin 17:343–350

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Campbell DA, Kay SP (1996) The hand injury severity scoring system. J Hand Surg Br 21:295–298

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Clark DP, Scott RN, Anderson IW (1985) Hand problems in an accident and emergency department. J Hand Surg Br 10:297–299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Germann G, Harth A, Wind G, Demir E (2003) Standardisation and validation of the German version 2.0 of the disability of arm, shoulder, hand (DASH) questionnaire. Unfallchirurg 106:13–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Germann G, Wind G, Harth A (1999) The DASH (Disability of Arm-Shoulder-Hand) Questionnaire: a new instrument for evaluating upper extremity treatment outcome. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 31:149–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hankiss J, Holdenried M (2011) Möglichkeiten und Ergebnisse der (freien) vaskularisierten Knochentransplantation im Ober- und Unterarmbereich. Obere Extremität 6:177–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hierner R, Wolf K (2011) Vaskularisierte Knochentransplantate—Eine Übersicht. Obere Extremität 6:159–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hill C, Riaz M, Mozzam A, Brennen MD (1998) A regional audit of hand and wrist injuries. A study of 4,873 injuries. J Hand Surg Br 23:196–200

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoxie SC, Capo JA, Dennison DG, Shin AY (2009) The economic impact of electric saw injuries to the hand. J Hand Surg Am 34:886–889

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jester A, Harth A, Wind G, Germann G (2003) The “Shoulder, Arms and Hand Disability Questionnaire” as a scale for identification of the diagnosis-specific activity profile. Unfallchirurg 106:834–838

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lindqvist A, Hialmarsson M, Nilsson O (2011) DASH and Sollerman test scores after hand injury from powered wood splitters. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 36(1):57–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lindqvist A, Gerdin B (2008) Hand injury from powered wood splitters. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 42:246–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lukash FN, Greenberg BM, Gallico GG 3rd, Panda M, May JW Jr (1992) A socioeconomic analysis of digital replantations resulting from home use of power tools. J Hand Surg Am 17:1042–1044

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Martini AK (2007) Begutachtung von Handverletzungen—Fallbeispiel. Obere Extremität 2:112–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mink van der Molen AB, Ettema AM, Hovius SER (2003) Outcome of hand trauma: the Hand Injury Severity Scoring System (HISS) and subsequent impairment and disability. J Hand Surg Br 28(4):295–299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mink van der Molen AB, Matloub HS, Dzwierzynski W et al (1999) The Hand Injury Severity Scoring System amd worker’s compensation cases in Wisconsin, USA. J Hand Surg Br 24(2):184–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Offenbacher M, Ewert T, Sangha O, Stucki G (2003) Validation of a German version of the ‘Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand’ questionnaire (DASH-G). Z Rheumatol 62:168–177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sollerman C, Ejeskär A (1995) Sollerman hand function test. A standardised method and its use in tetraplegic patients. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 29:167–176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Trybus M, Lorkowski J, Brongel L, Hladki W (2006) Causes and consequences of hand injuries. Am J Surg 192:52–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Weinzweig J, Weinzweig N (1997) The “Tic-Tac-Toe” classification system for mutilating injuries of the hand. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:1200–1211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Weinzweig N, Weinzweig J (2005) The mutilated hand. Elsevier Mosby, Philadelphia, pp 31–48

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Abteilung für Hand-, Replantations- und Mikrochirurgie, Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin, Warener Str. 7, 12683, Berlin, Germany

    A. Eisenschenk & J.-H. Farwick

  2. Klinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin, Warener Str. 7, 12683, Berlin, Germany

    A. Ekkernkamp & D. Stengel

  3. Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Zentrum für Handchirurgie, Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Orthopädische Chirurgie, Abt. für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, F.-Sauerbruch-Straße, Klinikumsneubau, 17475, Greifswald, Germany

    A. Zach

Authors
  1. A. Eisenschenk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Ekkernkamp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. Stengel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Zach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J.-H. Farwick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J.-H. Farwick.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eisenschenk, A., Ekkernkamp, A., Stengel, D. et al. A new pathway to classification of complex hand injuries: a clinical pilot testing using a new method of assessment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132, 1343–1351 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-012-1549-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-012-1549-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation