Skip to main content
Log in

Vibratory communication in the soil: pupal signals deter larval intrusion in a group-living beetle Trypoxylus dichotoma

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pupae of several insect species are known to generate air-borne sounds and/or substrate-borne vibrations, but the functions of the sounds/vibrations are not well understood. Here, we present the first evidence of vibratory communication between pupae and larvae of a group-living Japanese rhinoceros beetle Trypoxylus dichotoma which inhabits humus soil. The last-instar larvae of this beetle construct their own pupal cells to ensure normal pupation and eclosion. These cells are fragile and subject to damage from burrowing larvae because pupae and larvae co-inhabit the same patches of humus. In laboratory experiments, we demonstrated that pupal cells harboring live pupae were less likely to be broken by larvae than those harboring dead pupae. It was also demonstrated that pupae produced vibrations in response to larvae approaching the pupal cells. High-speed video and vibration analyses showed that pupae emitted 3–7 pulses at 1.3-s intervals by beating their pronotum against the inner wall of the pupal cell. The pupal vibration was of low frequency with a maximum energy at ≈ 100 Hz. The drumming behavior was more frequently observed in the presence of an approaching larva than in its absence. When pupal vibrations were played back near to vacant artificial pupal cells, these cells were rarely disturbed by the larvae. These results provide evidence that pupae generate vibrations to deter conspecific larvae, thereby preventing damage to the cells. This larval response to pupal vibrations may have evolved through preexisting anti-predator and/or sib-killing-avoidance behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barbero F, Thomas JA, Bonelli S, Belletto E, Schönrogge K (2009) Queen ants make distinctive sounds that are mimicked by a butterfly social parasite. Science 323:782–785

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cocroft RB (1999) Parent-offspring communication in response to predators in a subsocial treehopper (Hemiptera: Membracidae: Umbonia crassicornis). Ethology 105:553–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocroft RB (2005) Vibrational communication facilitates cooperative foraging in a phloem-feeding insect. Proc R Soc B 272:1023–1029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cocroft RB, Hamel JA (2010) Vibrational communication in the “other” social insects: a diversity of ecology, signals, and signal function. In: O’Connell-Rodwell C (ed) The use of vibrations in communication: properties, mechanisms and function across taxa. Research Signposts, India, pp 47–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocroft RB, Rodríguez RL (2005) The behavioral ecology of insect vibrational communication. BioScience 55:323–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Čokl A, Virant-Doberlet M (2003) Communication with substrate-borne signals in small plant-dwelling insects. Annu Rev Entomol 48:29–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards DP, Yu DW (2007) The roles of sensory traps in the origin, maintenance, and breakdown of mutualism. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1321–1327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisner T, Eisner M (1992) Operation and defensive role of “gin traps” in a coccinellid pupa (Cycloneda sanguinea). Psyche 99:265–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field LH, Matheson T (1998) Chordotonal organs in insects. Adv Insect Physiol 27:1–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher LE (2007) Vibrational signals in a gregarious sawfly larva (Perga affinis): group coordination or competitive signaling? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1809–1821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner A, Griffin AS, West SA (2010) Altruism and cooperation. In: Westneat DF, Fox CW (eds) Evolutionary behavioural ecology. Oxford Univ Press, New York, pp 308–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1964a) The genetical evolution of social behaviour I. J Theor Biol 7:1–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1964b) The genetical evolution of social behaviour II. J Theor Biol 7:17–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hill PSM (2009) How do animals use substrate-borne vibrations as an information source? Naturwissenschaften 96:1355–1371

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hinton HE (1946) The “gin-traps” of some beetle pupae; a protective device which appears to be unknown. Trans R Entomol Soc Lond 97:473–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinton HE (1948) Sound production in Lepidopterous pupae. Entomologist 81:254–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Ichikawa T, Kurauchi T (2009) Larval cannibalism and pupal defence against cannibalism in two species of tenebrionid beetles. Zool Sci 26:525–529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laird NM, Ware JH (1982) Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 38:963–974

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert D (1992) Zero-inflated Poisson regression with an application to defects in manufacturing. Technometrics 31:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mankin RW, Brandhorst-Hubbard J, Flanders KL, Zhang M, Crocker RL, Lapointe SL, McCoy CW, Fisher JR, Weaver DK (2000) Eavesdropping on insects hidden in soil and interior structures of plants. J Econ Entomol 93:1173–1182

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McIver SB (1985) Mechanoreception. In: Kerkut GA, Gilbert LI (eds) Comprehensive insect physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology VI. Pergamon, New York, pp 71–132

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez RL, Ramaswamy K, Cocroft RB (2006) Evidence that female preferences have shaped male signal evolution in a clade of specialized plant-feeding insects. Proc R Soc B 273:2585–2593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stumpner A, von Helversen D (2001) Evolution and function of auditory systems in insects. Naturwissenschaften 88:159–170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan-Beckers L, Cocroft RB (2009) The importance of female choice, male-male competition, and signal transmission as causes of selection on male mating signals. Evolution 64:3158–3171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travassos MA, Pierce NE (2000) Acoustics, context and function of vibrational signalling in a lycaenid butterfly-ant mutualism. Anim Behav 60:13–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tsurumaki H (1987) Collecting and breeding of the Japanese rhinoceros beetle. Saishu To Shiiku 49:254–257 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Virant-Doberlet M, Čokl A (2004) Vibrational communication in insects. Neotrop Entomol 33:121–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yack JE, Smith ML, Weatherhead PJ (2001) Caterpillar talk: acoustically mediated territoriality in larval Lepidoptera. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:11371–11375

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Surlykke, H. Nishino, R. Nakano, and the two anonymous referees for invaluable comments on the manuscript, W. Ohmura and M. Jinkawa for the loan of the highspeed video and the vibration excitor, and R. Nakano for preliminary vibration recordings. This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (T.T., Y.I.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takuma Takanashi.

Additional information

Communicated by J. Choe

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 3.86 mb)

ESM 2

(WMV 1.16 mb)

(WMV 1.38 mb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kojima, W., Takanashi, T. & Ishikawa, Y. Vibratory communication in the soil: pupal signals deter larval intrusion in a group-living beetle Trypoxylus dichotoma . Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66, 171–179 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1264-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1264-5

Keywords

Navigation