Skip to main content
Log in

The total costs of a displaced femoral neck fracture: comparison of internal fixation and total hip replacement

A randomised study of 146 hips

  • Review Article
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We randomised 143 patients –age 75 years or older–with displaced femoral neck fracture to either internal fixation or total hip replacement (THR) and compared the socio-economic consequences. In the internal fixation group, 34 of 78 hips underwent secondary surgery. In the THR group, 12 of 68 hips dislocated, the majority in mentally impaired patients. We calculated the total hospital costs for two years after operation. When secondary surgery was included, there was no difference in costs between the internal fixation and THR groups, or between the mentally impaired and lucid subgroups. The costs to the community were calculated comparing the baseline cost before surgery with the average cost per month during the first postoperative year. No difference was found between the treatment groups. The Harris hip scores were higher in the THR group, and pain was more common in the internal fixation group. In lucid patients, THR gives a better clinical result at the same cost.

Résumé

Nous avons randomisé 143 malades-âgés de 75 ans ou plus– avec une fracture du col fémoral déplacée traitée par fixation interne ou remplacement totale de la hanche et avons comparé les conséquences socio-économiques. Dans le groupe de la fixation interne, 34/78 hanches ont subi une chirurgie secondaire. Dans le groupe PTH, 12/68 hanches se sont luxées, la majorité chez des malades mentalement affaiblis. Nous avons calculé les coûts totaux d’hospitalisation jusqu’à deux années postopératoires. Quand la chirurgie secondaire a été incluse, il n’y avait aucune différence dans les coûts entre la fixation interne et le groupe PTH, ou entre les sous-groupes mentalement affaibli et lucides. Les coûts municipaux ont été calculés en comparant le coût de base avant chirurgie avec le coût moyen par mois pendant la première année postopératoire. Aucune différence n’a été trouvée entre les groupes de traitement. Le score de hanche de Harris étaient supérieur dans le groupe PTH et la douleur était plus fréquente dans le groupe de la fixation interne. Chez les malades lucides, la PTH donne un meilleur résultat clinique au même coût.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bachrach-Lindstrom M, Johansson T, Unosson M, Ek AC, Wahlstrom O (2000) Nutritional status and functional capacity after femoral neck fractures: a prospective randomized one-year follow-up study. Aging (Milano) 12(5):366–374

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brainsky A, Glick H, Lydick E, Epstein R, Fox KM, Hawkes W, Kashner TM, Zimmerman SI, Magaziner J (1997) The economic cost of hip fractures in community-dwelling older adults: a prospective study. J Am Geriatr Soc 45(3):281–287

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Drummond M, O’Brien B, Stoddart GL et al (1997) Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  4. Iorio R, Healy WL, Lemos DW, Appleby D, Lucchesi CA, Saleh KJ (2001) Displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: outcomes and cost effectiveness. Clin Ortop 383:229–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Johansson T, Jacobsson SA, Ivarsson I, Knutsson A, Wahlström O (2000) Internal fixation versus total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 71(6):597–602

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jonsson B, Sernbo I, Carlsson A, Fredin H, Johnell O (1996) Social function after cervical hip fracture. A comparison of hook-pins and total hip replacement in 47 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 67(5):431–434

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee BP, Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Sim FH (1988) Total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of an acute fracture of the femoral neck: long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 80:70–75

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lu-Yao GL, Keller RB, Littenberg B, Wennberg JE (1994) Outcomes after displaced fractures of the femoral neck. A meta-analysis of one hundred and six published reports. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 76:15–25

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Neander G (2000) Displaced femoral neck fractures. Studies on osteosynthesis and total hip arthroplasty. Thesis, Karolinska Institutet; http://www.diss.kib.ki.se/2000/91-628-4167-X

  10. Papandrea RF, Froimson MI (1996) Total hip arthroplasty after acute displaced femoral neck fractures. Am J Orthop 85–88

  11. Reinhardt UE (1997) Spending more through “cost control”: our obsessive quest to gut the hospital. Nurs Outlook 45(4):156–160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Roden M, Schon M, Fredin H (2003) Treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures: a randomized minimum 5-year follow-up study of screws and bipolar hemiprostheses in 100 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 74(1):42–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rogmark C, Carlsson A, Johnell O, Sernbo I (2002) A prospective randomised trial of internal fixation versus arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the neck of the femur. Functional outcome for 450 patients at two years. J Bone Jt Surg (Br) 84(2):183–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rogmark C, Carlsson A, Johnell O, Sembo I (2003) Costs of internal fixation and arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: a randomized study of 68 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 74:293–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Söreide O, Alho A, Rietti D (1980) Internal fixation versus endoprosthesis in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly. A prospective analysis of the comparative costs and the consumption of hospital resources. Acta Orthop Scand 51:827–831

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tidermark J, Ponzer S, Svensson O, Soderqvist A, Tornkvist H (2003) Internal fixation compared with total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. A randomised, controlled trial. J Bone Jt Surg (Br) 85(3):380–388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Weinstein MC, Siegel JE, Gold MR, Kamlet MS, Russell LB (1996) Recommendations of the Panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA 276(15):1253–1258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Vickrey W (1987) Marginal and average-cost pricing. In: Eatwell et al (eds) The new Palgrave, vol. II. . Macmillan, London

  19. Zelen M (1979) A new design for randomized clinical trials. N Engl J Med 300:1242–1245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zethraeus N, Strömberg L, Jönsson B, Svensson O, Öhlén G (1997) The cost of a hip fracture. Estimates for 1,709 patients in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 68(1):13–17

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Torsten Johansson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johansson, T., Bachrach-Lindström, M., Aspenberg, P. et al. The total costs of a displaced femoral neck fracture: comparison of internal fixation and total hip replacement. International Orthopaedics (SICO 30, 1–6 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-005-0037-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-005-0037-z

Keywords

Navigation