Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Reducing the effects of metal artefact using high keV monoenergetic reconstruction of dual energy CT (DECT) in hip replacements

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to determine whether high keV monoenergetic reconstruction of dual energy computed tomography (DECT) could be used to overcome the effects of beam hardening artefact that arise from preferential deflection of low energy photons.

Materials and Methods

Two phantoms were used: a Charnley total hip replacement set in gelatine and a Catphan 500. DECT datasets were acquired at 100, 200 and 400 mA (Siemens Definition Flash, 100 and 140 kVp) and reconstructed using a standard combined algorithm (1:1) and then as monoenergetic reconstructions at 10 keV intervals from 40 to 190 keV. Semi-automated segmentation with threshold inpainting was used to obtain the attenuation values and standard deviation (SD) of the streak artefact. High contrast line pair resolution and background noise were assessed using the Catphan 500.

Results

Streak artefact is progressively reduced with increasing keV monoenergetic reconstructions. Reconstruction of a 400 mA acquisition at 150 keV results in reduction in the volume of streak artefact from 65 cm3 to 17 cm3 (74 %). There was a decrease in the contrast to noise ratio (CNR) at higher tube voltages, with the peak CNR seen at 70–80 keV. High contrast spatial resolution was maintained at high keV values.

Conclusion

Monoenergetic reconstruction of dual energy CT at increasing theoretical kilovoltages reduces the streak artefact produced by beam hardening from orthopaedic prostheses, accompanied by a modest increase in heterogeneity of background image attenuation, and decrease in contrast to noise ratio, but no deterioration in high contrast line pair resolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fayad LM, Patra A, Fishman EK. Value of 3D CT in defining skeletal complications of orthopedic hardware in the postoperative patient. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193(4):1155–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Buckwalter KA, Rydberg J, Kopecky KK, Crow K, Yang EL. Musculoskeletal imaging with multislice CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176(4):979–86.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Barrett JF, Keat N. Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. Radiographics. 2004;24(6):1679–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Moon SG, Hong SH, Choi J-Y, Jun WS, Kang H-G, Kim H-S, et al. Metal artifact reduction by the alteration of technical factors in multidetector computed tomography: a 3-dimensional quantitative assessment. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2008;32(4):630–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Perrella A, Lopes PML, Rocha RG, Fenyo-Pereira M, Cavalcanti MGP. Influence of dental metallic artifact from multislice CT in the assessment of simulated mandibular lesions. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010;18(2):149–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vande Berg B, Malghem J, Maldague B, Lecouvet F. Multi-detector CT imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient with metal hardware. Eur J Radiol. 2006;60(3):470–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Link TM, Berning W, Scherf S, Joosten U, Joist A, Engelke K, et al. CT of metal implants: reduction of artifacts using an extended CT scale technique. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2000;24(1):165–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fishman EK, Magid D, Robertson DD, Brooker AF, Weiss P, Siegelman SS. Metallic hip implants: CT with multiplanar reconstruction. Radiology. 1986;160(3):675–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stradiotti P, Curti A, Castellazzi G, Zerbi A. Metal-related artifacts in instrumented spine. Techniques for reducing artifacts in CT and MRI: state of the art. Eur Spine J. 2009;18 Suppl 1:102–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kalender WA, Hebel R, Ebersberger J. Reduction of CT artifacts caused by metallic implants. Radiology. 1987;164(2):576–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mahnken AH, Raupach R, Wildberger JE, Jung B, Heussen N, Flohr TG, et al. A new algorithm for metal artifact reduction in computed tomography: in vitro and in vivo evaluation after total hip replacement. Invest Radiol. 2003;38(12):769–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. De Cecco CN, Buffa V, Fedeli S, Luzietti M, Vallone A, Ruopoli R, et al. Dual energy CT (DECT) of the liver: conventional versus virtual unenhanced images. Eur Radiol. 2010;20(12):2870–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Graser A, Johnson TRC, Chandarana H, Macari M. Dual energy CT: preliminary observations and potential clinical applications in the abdomen. Eur Radiol. 2009;19(1):13–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brown CL, Hartman RP, Dzyubak OP, Takahashi N, Kawashima A, McCollough CH, et al. Dual-energy CT iodine overlay technique for characterization of renal masses as cyst or solid: a phantom feasibility study. Eur Radiol. 2009;19(5):1289–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Droege RT, Morin RL. A practical method to measure the MTF of CT scanners. Med Phys. 1982;9(5):758–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Verdun FR, Denys A, Valley J-F, Schnyder P, Meuli RA. Detection of Low-Contrast Objects: Experimental Comparison of Single– and Multi–Detector Row CT with a Phantom1. Radiology. 2002;223(2):426–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gupta AK, Nelson RC, Johnson GA, Paulson EK, Delong DM, Yoshizumi TT. Optimization of Eight-Element Multi–Detector Row Helical CT Technology for Evaluation of the Abdomen1. Radiology. 2003;227(3):739–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Farr RF, Allisy-Roberts PJ. Physics for medical imaging. London: Saunders; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wang G, Frei T, Vannier MW. Fast iterative algorithm for metal artifact reduction in X-ray CT. Acad Radiol. 2000;7(8):607–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee M-J, Kim S, Lee S-A, Song H-T, Huh Y-M, Kim D-H, et al. Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-field-strength MR imaging and multi-detector CT. Radiographics. 2007;27(3):791–803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Robertson DD, Weiss PJ, Fishman EK, Magid D, Walker PS. Evaluation of CT techniques for reducing artifacts in the presence of metallic orthopedic implants. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1988;12(2):236–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bamberg F, Dierks A, Nikolaou K, Reiser MF, Becker CR, Johnson TRC. Metal artifact reduction by dual energy computed tomography using monoenergetic extrapolation. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(7):1424–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Conflict of Interests

None.

Ethical approval

None required.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK

    Mark Lewis & Karen Reid

  2. Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital & University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK

    Andoni P. Toms

  3. Norwich Radiology Academy, Colney Lane, Norwich, NR4 7UB, UK

    Mark Lewis

Authors
  1. Mark Lewis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Karen Reid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andoni P. Toms
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Lewis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lewis, M., Reid, K. & Toms, A.P. Reducing the effects of metal artefact using high keV monoenergetic reconstruction of dual energy CT (DECT) in hip replacements. Skeletal Radiol 42, 275–282 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-012-1458-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-012-1458-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation