Abstract
Background
Adnexal torsion is rare, and symptoms are nonspecific. Clinicians often rely on US examinations to evaluate girls with abdominal or pelvic pain.
Objective
To determine which sonographic findings can predict adnexal torsion by comparing pediatric and adolescent patients with surgically confirmed torsion (cases) to those without torsion (controls).
Materials and methods
Cases and controls were identified retrospectively by searching 7 years of medical record and radiology databases. An adnexal ratio was calculated as the volume of the affected adnexa divided by the volume of the unaffected adnexa.
Results
We identified 61 menarchal subjects: 33 cases and 28 controls. Adnexal volume was larger in cases than in controls (185 vs. 37.8 ml, P < 0.001). A volume of >75 ml was more common in cases than in controls (64 vs. 15%, P < 0.001). No cases had an adnexal volume of <20 ml (P < 0.001). The adnexal ratio was larger in cases than in controls (16.1 vs. 6.7, P < 0.001). An adnexal ratio of >15 was seen in 40% of cases and in no controls (P = 0.08). Doppler US results were not predictive of torsion.
Conclusion
An adnexal volume of <20 ml is strong evidence against adnexal torsion in menarchal females. In this age group, the diagnosis of torsion cannot be established by US examination alone.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Siegel MJ, Carel C, Surratt S (1991) Ultrasonography of acute abdominal pain in children. JAMA 266:1987–1989
Rosado WM Jr, Trambert MA, Gosink BB et al (1992) Adnexal torsion: diagnosis by using Doppler sonography. AJR 159:1251–1253
Hurh PJ, Meyer JS, Shaaban A (2002) Ultrasound of a torsed ovary: characteristic gray-scale appearance despite normal arterial and venous flow on Doppler. Pediatr Radiol 32:586–588
Ben-Ami M, Perlitz Y, Haddad S (2002) The effectiveness of spectral and color Doppler in predicting ovarian torsion. A prospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 104:64–66
Lee EJ, Kwon HC, Joo HJ et al (1998) Diagnosis of ovarian torsion with color Doppler sonography: depiction of twisted vascular pedicle. J Ultrasound Med 17:83–89
Vijayaraghavan SB (2004) Sonographic whirlpool sign in ovarian torsion. J Ultrasound Med 23:1643–1649, quiz 1650–1651
Graif M, Itzchak Y (1988) Sonographic evaluation of ovarian torsion in childhood and adolescence. AJR 150:647–649
Graif M, Shalev J, Strauss S et al (1984) Torsion of the ovary: sonographic features. AJR 143:1331–1334
Kiechl-Kohlendorfer U, Maurer K, Unsinn KM et al (2006) Fluid-debris level in follicular cysts: a pathognomonic sign of ovarian torsion. Pediatr Radiol 36:421–425
Stark JE, Siegel MJ (1994) Ovarian torsion in prepubertal and pubertal girls: sonographic findings. AJR 163:1479–1482
Servaes S, Zurakowski D, Laufer MR et al (2007) Sonographic findings of ovarian torsion in children. Pediatr Radiol 37:446–451
Orsini LF, Salardi S, Pilu G et al (1984) Pelvic organs in premenarchal girls: real-time ultrasonography. Radiology 153:113–116
Rody A, Jackisch C, Klockenbusch W et al (2002) The conservative management of adnexal torsion – a case-report and review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 101:83–86
Cil AP, Akgul MA, Tulunay G et al (2006) Recovery of ovarian function after detorsion: Doppler findings. Acta Radiol 47:618–620
Bellah RD, Rosenberg HK (1991) Transvaginal ultrasound in a children’s hospital: is it worthwhile? Pediatr Radiol 21:570–574
Bulas DI, Ahlstrom PA, Sivit CJ et al (1992) Pelvic inflammatory disease in the adolescent: comparison of transabdominal and transvaginal sonographic evaluation. Radiology 183:435–439
Leibman AJ, Kruse B, McSweeney MB (1988) Transvaginal sonography: comparison with transabdominal sonography in the diagnosis of pelvic masses. AJR 151:89–92
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Linam, L.E., Darolia, R., Naffaa, L.N. et al. US findings of adnexal torsion in children and adolescents: size really does matter. Pediatr Radiol 37, 1013–1019 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-007-0599-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-007-0599-6