Skip to main content
Log in

Passive and electro-assisted delivery of hydrogel nanoparticles in solid tumors, visualized by optical and magnetic resonance imaging in vivo

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study describes a development of nanohydrogel, loaded with QD705 and manganese (QD705@Nanogel and QD705@Mn@Nanogel), and its passive and electro-assisted delivery in solid tumors, visualized by fluorescence imaging and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on colon cancer-grafted mice as a model. QD705@Nanogel was delivered passively predominantly into the tumor, which was visualized in vivo and ex vivo using fluorescent imaging. The fluorescence intensity increased gradually within 30 min after injection, reached a plateau between 30 min and 2 h, and decreased gradually to the baseline within 24 h. The fluorescence intensity in the tumor area was about 2.5 times higher than the background fluorescence. A very weak fluorescent signal was detected in the liver area, but not in the areas of the kidneys or bladder. This result was in contrast with our previous study, indicating that FITC@Mn@Nanogel did not enter into the tumor and was detected rapidly in the kidney and bladder after i.v. injection [J. Mater. Chem. B 2013, 1, 4932–4938]. We found that the embedding of a hard material (as QD) in nanohydrogel changes the physical properties of the soft material (decreases the size and negative charge and changes the shape) and alters its pharmacodynamics. Electroporation facilitated the delivery of the nanohydrogel in the tumor tissue, visualized by fluorescent imaging and MRI. Strong signal intensity was recorded in the tumor area shortly after the combined treatment (QD@Mn@Nanogel + electroporation), and it was observed even 48 h after the electroporation. The data demonstrate more effective penetration of the nanoparticles in the tumor due to the increased permeability of blood vessels at the electroporated area. There was no rupture of blood vessels after electroporation, and there were no artifacts in the images due to a bleeding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bakalova R, Zhelev Z, Aoki I, Kano I (2007) Designing quantum dot probes. Nat Photonics 1:487–489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Janib JA, Moses SM, MacKey AS (2010) Imaging and drug delivery using theranostic nanoparticles. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 62:11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kokuryo D, Nakashima S, Ozaki F, Yuba E, Chuang KH, Aoshima S, Ishizaka Y, Saga T, Aoki I (2015) Evaluation of thermo-triggered drug release in intramuscular-transplanted tumors using thermosensitive polymer-modified liposomes and MRI. Nanomedicine 11:229–238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Christian DA, Cai S, Bowen DM, Kim Y, Pajerowski JD, Discher DE (2009) Polymersome carriers: from self-assembly to siRNA and protein therapeutics. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 71:463–474

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lrvine DH, Ghoroghchian PP, Freudenberg J, Zhang G, Therien MJ, Greene MI, Hammer DA, Mirali R (2008) Polymersomes: a new multi-functional tool for cancer diagnosis and therapy. Methods 46:25032

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baeza A, Colilla M, Vallet-Regi M (2015) Advances in mesoporous silica nanoparticles for targeted stimuli-responsive drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 12:319–337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Murayama S, Nishiyama T, Takagi K, Ishizuka F, Santa T, Kato M (2012) Devilevry, stabilization, and spatiotemporal activation of cargo molecules in cells with positively charged nanoparticles. Chem Commun (Camb) 48:11461–11463

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Murayama S, Su B, Okabe K, Kishimura A, Osada K, Miura M, Funatsu T, Kataoka K, Kato K (2012) NanoPARCEL: a method for controlling cellular behaviour with external light. Chem Commun (Camb) 48:8380–8382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Murayama S, Jo J, Shibata Y, Liang K, Santa T, Saga T, Aoki I, Kato M (2013) The simple preparation of polyethilene glykol-based soft nanoparticles containing dual imaging probes. J Mater Chem B 1:4932–4938

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Neumann E, Shaeffer-Rider M, Wang Y, Hofschnaider P (1982) Gene transfer into mouse lyoma cells by electroporation in high electric fields. EMBO J 1:841–845

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tsoneva I, Iordanov I, Berger A, Nikolova B, Tomov T, Mudrov N, Berger MR (2010) Electrodelivery of drugs into cancer cells in the presence of poloxamer 188. J Biomed Biotechnol

  12. Rodriguez-Devora JI, Ambure S, Shi Z-D, Yuan Y, Sun W, Xu T (2012) Physically facilitating drug-delivery systems. Ther Deliv 3:125–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dotsinski I, Nikolova B, Peycheva E, Tsoneva I (2010) New modality for electrochemotherapy of surface tumors. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 26:3402–3406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yarmush ML, Golberg A, Sersa G, Kotnik T, Miklavcic D (2014) Electroporation-based technologies for medicine: principles, applications, and challenges. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 16:295–320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sapsford KE, Algar WR, Berti L, Gemmill KB, Casey BJ, Oh E, Stewart MH, Medintz IL (2013) Functionalizing nanoparticles with biological molecules: developing chemistries that facilitate nanotechnology. Chem Rev 113:1904–2074

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cai W, Chen K, Li ZB, Gambhir SS, Chen X (2007) Dual-function probe for PET and near-infrared fluorescence imaging of tumor vasculature. J Nucl Med 48:1862–1870

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Langereis S, Geelen T, Grull H, Strijkers GJ, Nicolay K (2013) Paramagnetic liposomes for molecular MRI and MRI guided drug delivery. NMR Biomed 26:728–744

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bakalova R, Lazarova D, Nikolova B, Atanasova S, Zlateva G, Zhelev Z, Aoki I (2015) Delivery of size-controlled long-circulating polymerzomes in solid tumors, vizualized by quantum dots and optical imaging in vivo. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 29:175–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Erickson HP (2009) Size and shape of protein molecules and the mamometer level determined by sedimentation, gel filtration, and electron microscopy. In: “Biological Procedures Online” (Shullin Li, ed.), Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 32-51

  20. Sersa G, Krzic M, Sentjurc M, Ivanusa T, Beravs K, Kotnik V, Coer A, Swartz HM, Cemazar M (2002) Reduced blood flow and oxygenation in SA-1 tumours after electrochemotherapy with cisplatin. Br J Cancer 87:1047–1054

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gehl J, Skovsgaar T, Mir L (2002) Vascular reaction to in vivo electroporation: characterization and consequences for drug and gene delivery. Biochem Biophys Acta 1569:51–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Peycheva E, Daskalov I, Tsoneva I (2007) Electrochemotherapy of Mycosis fungoides by interferon-α. Bioelectrochemistry 70:283–286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Murayama S, Kato M (2010) Photocontrol of biological activities of protein by means of a hydrogel. Anal Chem 82:2186–2191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Aoki I, Yoneyama M, Hirose J, Minemoto Y, Koyama T, Kokuryo D, Bakalova R, Murayama S, Saga T, Aoshima S, Ishizaka Y, Kono K (2015) Thermoactivatable polymer-grafted liposomes for low-invasive image-guided chemotherapy. Transl Res [E-pub: August 6]

  25. Huang S, Deshmukh H, Rajagopalan KK, Wang S (2014) Gold nanoparticles electroporation enhanced polyplex delivery to mammalian cells. Electrophoresis 35:1837–1845

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zu Y, Huang S, Liao WC, Lu Y, Wang S (2014) Gold nanoparticles enhanced electroporation for mammalian cell transfection. J Biomed Nanotechnol 10:982–992

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Boukany PE, Wu Y, Zhao X, Kwak KJ, Glazer PJ, Leong K, Lee LJ (2014) Nonendocytic delivery of lipoplex nanoparticles into living cells using nanochannel electroporation. Adv Healthc Mater 3:682–689

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hobo W, Novobrantseva TI, Fredrix H, Wong J, Milstein S, Epstein-Barash H, Liu J, Schaap N, van der Voort R, Dolstra H (2013) Improving dendritic cell vaccine immunogenicity by silencing PD-1 ligands using siRNA-lipid nanoparticles combined with antigen mRNA electroporation. Cancer Immunol Immunother 62:285–297

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yoo J, Won N, Kim H, Bang J, Kim S, Ahn S, Soh K (2010) In vivo imaging of cancer cells with electroporation of quantum dots and multispcetral imaging. J Appl Phys 107:124702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. West DL, White SB, Zhang Z, Larson AC, Omary RA (2014) Assessment and optimization of electroporation-assisted tumoral nanoparticle uptake in a nude mouse model of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Int J Nanomedicine 9:4169–4176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nanda GS, Sun FX, Hofmann GA, Hoffman RM, Dev SB (1998) Electroporation enhances therapeutic efficiency of anticancer drugs: treatment of human pancreatic tumor in animal model. Anticancer Res 18:1361–1366

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bennet KM, Jo J, Carbral H, Bakalova R, Aoki I (2014) MR imaging techniques for nanopathophysiology and theranosctics. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 74:75–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Saito S, Hasegawa S, Sekita A, Bakalova R, Furukawa T, Murase K, Saga T, Aoki I (2013) Manganese-enhanced MRI reveals early-phase radiation-induced cell alterations in vivo. Cancer Res 73:3216–3224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Ms. Sayaka Shibata (Molecular Imaging Center, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Japan) for her assistance during the experiments in vivo, Mr. Yoshikazu Ozawa for his assistance during the MRI measurements, and the One-stop Sharing Faculty Center for Future Drug Discoveries in the University of Tokyo for AFM measurements. The study was partially supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology of Japan (Grant-in-Aid “Kakenhi” to R.B. and S.M., and JSPS Fellowship to B.N.) and conducted by the EU-COST Action TD1104.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rumiana Bakalova.

Ethics declarations

Author contributions

R.B., Z.Z., and I.A. designed the study; B.N., S.A., S.M., and M.K. performed the experiments; R.B., B.N., and S.A. analyzed the data; R.B. and B.N. wrote the manuscript; and Z.Z., I.T., and T.S. revised the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 3.35 MB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bakalova, R., Nikolova, B., Murayama, S. et al. Passive and electro-assisted delivery of hydrogel nanoparticles in solid tumors, visualized by optical and magnetic resonance imaging in vivo. Anal Bioanal Chem 408, 905–914 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-015-9182-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-015-9182-4

Keywords

Navigation