References
Luo J, Betschart C, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JOL. Quantitative analyses of variability in normal vaginal shape and dimension on MR images. Int Urogynecol J. 2016. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291952011_Quantitative_analyses_of_variability_in_normal_vaginal_shape_and_dimension_on_MR_images.
Matthes ACS, Zucca-Matthes G. Measurement of vaginal flexibility and its involvement in the sexual health of women. J Women’s Health Care. 2016;5:302. doi:10.4172/2167-0420.1000302.
Veale D, Miles S, Bramley S, Muir G, Hodsoli J. Am I normal? A systematic review and construction of nomograms for flaccid and erect penis length and circumference in up to 15,521 men. BJU Int. 2015;115(6):978–86.
Matthes ACS, Zucca-Matthes G. Description of a medical condition: RSVS - Relative short vagina syndrome. RBSH. 2012;23:31–8. Online exclusive access at the SBRASH site: http://www.sbrash.org.br/revistas/sobre-a-rbsh.ISSN: 2236–0530.
Nascu PC, Vilos GA, Ettler HC, Abu-Rafea B, Hollet-Caines J, Ahmad R. Histopathologic findings on uterosacral ligaments in women with chronic pelvic pain and visually normal pelvis at laparoscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006;13:201–4. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2006.02.002.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None.
Additional information
An author’s reply to this comment is available at doi:10.1007/s00192-016-3103-8.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
do Carmo Silva Matthes, Â., Matthes, G.Z. A comment about the quantitative analysis of normal vaginal shape and dimension. Int Urogynecol J 27, 1609–1610 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3094-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3094-5