Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using harvest data to predict habitat-population relationship of the wild boarSus scrofa in Northern Italy

  • Published:
Acta Theriologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationships between the wild boarSus scrofa, Linnaeus 1758 density and the habitat characteristics were investigated by collecting bag records in 18 hunting areas during the 1995 and 1996 hunting seasons. The study areas were located in the Northern Apennines (N-Italy) from 470 to 1160 m a.s.l. In each study area a Density Index (DI) was calculated by weighting the number of wild boar culled in each hunting season on the number of hunting days and on the surface of the study areas. Moreover 16 habitat variables were measured in each study area. Correlation and regression analyses were performed considering the DI as a dependent variable. Mixed deciduous woods were positively correlated with wild boar density together with chestnuts woods and conifer reafforestations. No significant negative correlations were found. Twelve multiple regression models each including three habitat variables were ranked by the information-theoretic approach (modified Akaike’s information criterion). The study stressed the importance of mixed woods for wild boar and the usefulness of hunting data as a mean to predict the habitat suitability for the species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acevedo P., Escudero M. A., Muńoz R. and Gortázar C. 2006. Factors affecting wild boar abundance across an environmental gradient in Spain. Acta Theriologica 51: 327–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson D. R. and Burnham K. P. 2002. Avoiding pitfalls when using Information-theoretic methods. The Journal of Wildlife Management 66: 912–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson D. R., Burnham K. P. and Thompson W. L. 2000. Null hypothesis testing: problems, prevalence, and an alternative. The Journal of Wildlife Management 64: 912–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson D. R., Link W. A., Johnson D. H. and Burnham K. P. 2001. Suggestions for presenting the results of data analyses. The Journal of Wildlife Management 65: 373–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bissonette J. A. 1999. Small sample size problems in wildlife ecology: a contingent analytical approach. Wildlife Biology 5: 65–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boitani L. and Mattei L. 1992. Aging wild boar (Sus scrofa) by tooth eruption. [In: Ongulés/Ungulates 91. F. Spitz, G. Janeau, G. Gonzales and S. Aulaugnier, eds]. S.F.E.P.M.-I.R.G.M., Toulouse: 419–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boitani L., Mattei L., Nonis D. and Corsi F. 1994. Spatial and activity patterns of wild boar in Tuscany, Italy. Journal of Mammalogy 75: 600–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boitani L., Trapanese P. and Mattei L. 1995. Methods of population estimates of a hunted wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) population in Tuscany, Italy. Ibex —; Journal of Mountain Ecology 3: 197–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt S., Jullien J. M. and Vassant J. 1988. Peut on estimer l’effectif d’une population de sangliers par relevé d’empreintes sur la neige? Bulletin Mensuel O.N.C. 122: 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brangi A. and Meriggi A. 2003. Wild boar (Sus scrofa) spreading and crop damage in an area of western Prealps. Hystrix 14: 95–105. [In Italian with English summary]

    Google Scholar 

  • Braza F. and Alvarez F. 1988. Utilisation de l’habitat et organisation sociale du sanglier (Sus scrofa L.) a Doñana (Sud-Ouest de l’Espagne). Canadian Journal of Zoology 67: 2047–2051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham K. P. and Anderson D. R. 2002. Model selection and multi-model inference. A practical information-theoretic approach. 2nd Edition. Springer-Verlag. New York: 1–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cargnelutti B., Gerard J. F., Spitz F., Valet G. and Sardin T. 1990. Occupation par le sanglier (Sus scrofa) des habitats d’un agro-écosystème modifié lors de la méchanisation de l’agriculture. Gibier Faune Sauvage 7: 53–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caughley G. 1977. Analysis of vertebrate populations. John Wiley and Sons, New York: 1–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epperson B. K. 2000. Spatial and space-time correlations in ecological models. Ecological Modelling 132: 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Llario P. and Mateos-Quesada P. 2003. Population structure of the wild boar (Sus scrofa) in two Mediterranean habitats in the western Iberian Peninsula. Folia Zoologica 52: 143–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Focardi S., Toso S. and Pecchioli E. 1996. The population modelling of fallow deer and wild boar in a Mediterranean ecosystem. Forest Ecology and Management 88: 7–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier-Chambrillon C., Maillard D. and Fournier P. 1996. Variabilitè du règime alimentaire du sanglier (Sus scrofa L.) dans les garrigues de Montpellier (Hèrault). Gibier Faune Sauvage 13: 1457–1476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genov P. 1981. Food composition of Wild Boar in North-eastern and Western Poland. Acta Theriologica 26: 185–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerard J. E., Cargnelutti B., Spitz F., Valet G. and Sardin T. 1991. Habitat use of wild boar in a French agroecosystem from late winter to early summer. Acta Theriologica 36: 119–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groot Bruinderink G. W. T. A. and Hazebroek E. 1996. Wild boar (Sus scrofa scrofa L.) rooting and forest regeneration on podzolic soils in the Netherlands. Forest Ecology and Management 88: 71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen L. P., Nixon C. M. and Loomis F. 1986. Factors affecting daily and annual harvest of white-tailed deer in Illinois. Wildlife Society Bulletin 14: 368–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helldin J-O. 2000. Population trends and harvest management of pine marten Martes martes in Scandinavia. Wildlife Biology 6: 111–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsworth W. N. 1973. Hunting efficiency and white-tailed deer density. The Journal of Wildlife Management 37: 336–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall B. E. and Fox G. A. 1998. Spatial structure, environmental heterogeneity, and population dynamics: analysis of the coupled logistic map. Theoretical Population Biology 54: 11–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs C. J., Cilbert B. S. and Boutin S. 1986. Population biology of snowshoe hares. I. Demography of food-supplemented populations in the Southern Yukon. 1976-84. Journal of Animal Ecology 55: 963–982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeuwenberg F. and Hepburn I. (eds) 1982. Working Group on Game Statistics: proceedings of the 2nd Meeting, Doorwerth, 6–7 October 1982. International Union of Game Biologists, Zoetermer, Netherlands: 1–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massei G. and Genov P. 2000. [The wild boar]. Calderini Edagricole, Bologna: 1–189. [In Italian]

    Google Scholar 

  • Massei G., Genov P. and Staines B. W. 1996. Diet, food availability and reproduction of wild boar in a Mediterranean coastal area. Acta Theriologica 41: 307–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massei G., Genov P., Staines B. W. and Gorman M. L. 1997. Factors influencing home range and activity of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in a Mediterranean coastal area. Journal of Zoology, London 242: 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massolo A. and Meriggi A. 1998. Factors affecting habitat occupancy by wolves in the Northern Apennines (northern Italy): a model of habitat suitability. Ecography 21: 97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattioli L., Apollonio M., Lovari C., Siemoni N. and Crudele G. 1995. Wild boar as the main prey species of wolf in an area of the Northern Apennines (Italy). Ibex — Journal of Mountain Ecology 3: 212.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald R. A. and Harris S. 1999. The use of trapping records to monitor populations of stoatsMustela erminea and weaselsMustela nivalis: the importance of trapping effort. Journal of Applied Ecology 36: 679–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meriggi A. and Lovari S. 1996. A review of wolf predation in Southern Europe: does the wolf prefer wild prey to livestock? Journal of Applied Ecology 33: 1561–1571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meriggi A. and Sacchi O. 1992. Factors affecting damage by wild boar to cereal fields in Northern Italy. [In: Ongulés/ Ungulates 91. F. Spitz, G. Janeau, G. Gonzales and S. Aulaugnier, eds]. S.F.E.P.M.-I.R.G.M., Toulouse: 439–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meriggi A. and Sacchi O. 2001. Habitat requirements of wild boar in the Northern Apennines (N Italy): a multi-level approach. Italian Journal of Zoology 68: 47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meriggi A., Brangi A., Matteucci C. and Sacchi O. 1996. The feeding habits of wolves in relation to large prey availability in Northern Italy. Ecography 19: 287–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motta R. 1996. Impact of wild ungulates on forest regeneration and tree composition of mountain forest in the Western Italian Alps. Forest Ecology and Management 88: 93–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roseberry J. L. and Woolf A. 1991. A comparative evaluation of techniques for analyzing white-tailed deer harvest data. Wildlife Monographs 117: 1–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushton S. P., Ormerod S. J. and Kerby G. 2004. New paradigms for modelling species distribution? Journal of Applied Ecology 41: 193–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saez-Royuela C. and Telleria J. L. 1988. Las batidas como método de censo en especies de caza mayor: aplicacion al caso del jabalè (Sus scrofa L.) en la provincia de Burgos (Norte España). Doñana Acta Vertebrata 15: 215–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schley L. and Roper T. J. 2003. Diet of wild boarSus scrofa in Western Europe, with particular reference to consumption of agricultural crops. Mammal Review 33: 43–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer F. J., Otto D. K., Tipton A. R. and Hable C. P. 1981. Home ranges, movements and habitat use of European wild boar in Tennessee. The Journal of Wildlife Management 45: 343–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitz F. and Janeau G. 1990. Spatial strategies: an attempt to classify daily movements of wild boar. Acta Theriologica 35: 129–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitz F. and Leck S. 1999. Environmental impact prediction using neural network modelling. An example in wildlife damage. Journal of Applied Ecology 36: 317–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valet G., Rosell C., Chayron L., Fosty P. and Spitz F. 1994. Règime alimentaire automnal du sanglier (Sus scrofa) en Ariège, France, et en Catalogne, Espagne. Gibier Faune Sauvage 11: 313–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vassant J. and Breton D. 1986. Essai de rèduction de dégâts de sangliers sur le blé (Triticum aestivum) au stade laiteux par distribution de mais (Zea mais) en foret. Gibier Faune Sauvage 3: 83–95.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Animal Biology, University of Pavia, Piazza Botta 9, 27100, Pavia, Italy

    Enrico Merli & Alberto Meriggi

Authors
  1. Enrico Merli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alberto Meriggi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Associate Editor was Krzysztof Schmidt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Merli, E., Meriggi, A. Using harvest data to predict habitat-population relationship of the wild boarSus scrofa in Northern Italy. Acta Theriol 51, 383–394 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03195185

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03195185

Key words

Search

Navigation