Abstract
In the 1960s and early 1970s, the sociological study of deviance underwent a sharp break in orientation; many observers in the field began to shift their focus away from an examination of etiology to the study of social control. Examining the social construction of deviance and crime to the exclusion of crucial and unavoidable material features that cannot be defined away lead to certain conclusions that could not be sustained and were vulnerable to successful challenge from later approaches. The lives and work of Frank Tannenbaum, Jack Henry Abbott, and Alvin Gouldner, as well as the work of other labelists and Marxists, offer testimony to the limits of constructionism in the sociological study of deviance and crime.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott, Jack Henry. 1981.In the Belly of the Beast: Letters From Prison. New York: Random House.
Akers, Ronald L. 1985.Deviant Behavior: A Social Learning Approach (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Aurbach, Herbert A., et al. 1976. “SSSP as the Organization of a Social Movement: Comments and Suggestions.”Social Problems, 24(1):37–53.
Baudrillard, Jean. 1991. “The Reality Gulf.”The Guardian, January 11:25.
Becker, Howard S. 1963.Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: Free Press.
Becker, Howard S. 1967. “Whose Side Are We On?”Social Problems, 14(3):239–247.
Best, Joel. 1993. “But Seriously Folks: The Limitations of the Strict Constructionist Interpretation of Social Problems.” In Gale Miller and James A. Holstein, eds.,Constructionist Controversies: Issues in Social Problems Theory. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 109–127.
Chambliss, William J. 1973. The Saints and the Roughnecks.”Society, 11(Dec.):24–31.
Delpar, Helen. 1988. “Frank Tannenbaum, 1914–1933.”The Americas: A Quarterly Review of Inter-American Cultural History, 45(2):153–171.
Downes, David, and Paul Rock. 1988.Understanding Deviance: A Guide to the Sociology of Crime and Rule Breaking (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
Erikson, Kai T. 1964. “Notes on the Sociology of Deviance.” In Howard S. Becker, ed.,The Other Side. New York: Free Press, 9–21.
Farber, M.A. 1981a. “Convict-author Known by Mailer is Being Sought in Fatal Stabbing.”The New York Times, July 20:B3.
Farber, M.A. 1981b. “Killing Clouds Ex-convict Writer’The New York Times, July 26:1, 26.
Franklin, H. Bruce. 1986.Prison Literature in America: The Victim as Criminal and Artist (expanded ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Gibbs, Jack P. 1996. “Conceptions of Deviant Behavior: The Old and the New.”Pacific Sociological Review, 9(1):9–14.
Goffman, Erving. 1961.Asylums. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday-Anchor.
Gouldner, Alvin W. 1968. “The Sociologist as Partisan: Sociology and the Welfare State.”The American Sociologist, 3(2):103–116.
Gouldner, Alvin W. 1970.The Coming Crisis of American Sociology. New York: Basic Books.
Hamblin, Robert L. 1989–90. “Sociology and a Developing Administrative Tradition at Washington University: 1957–1971.”The American Sociologist, 20(4):324–329.
Holman, John E., and James F. Quinn. 1992.Criminology: Applying Theory. St. Paul, Minn.: West.
Humphreys, Laud. 1970.Tearoom Trade: Impersonal Sex in Public Places. Chicago: Aldine.
Jeffery, C. Ray. 1990.Criminology: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kakutani, Michiko. 1981. “The Strange Case of the Writer and the Criminal.”The New York Times Book Review, September 20:1, 36, 39.
Lemert, Edwin M. 1951.Social Pathology: A Systematic Approach to the Theory of Sociopathic Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Leonard, Eileen B. 1982.Women, Crime, and Society. A Critique of Criminological Theory. New York: Longman.
Liazos, Alexander. 1972. “The Poverty of the Sociology of Deviance: Nuts, Sluts, and Preverts.”Social Problems, 20(1):103–120.
Mailer, Norman. 1959. “The White Negro: Superficial Reflections on the Hipster.” InAdvertisements for Myself, New York: G.P. Putnam, 337–358.
Mailer, Norman. 1981. “Introduction.” InIn the Belly of the Beast: Letters from Prison, Jack Henry Abbott. New York: Random House, ix-xvi.
Mannle, Henry W., and J. David Hirschel. 1988.Fundamentals of Criminology (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Manso, Peter. 1985.Mailer: His Life and Times. New York: Viking.
Matza, David. 1969.Becoming Deviant. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Montgomery, Paul L. 1981. “Convict-author Sought in Slaying in New York is Seized in Louisiana.”The New York Times, September 24:A1, D27.
Nettler, Gwynn. 1974. “On Telling Who’s Crazy.”American Sociological Review, 39(6):893–894.
Nettler, Gwynn. 1984.Explaining Crime (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Pittman, David J., and Dierdre Boden. 1989–90. “Sociology at Washington University in St. Louis: History and Reflections, 1906–1989.”The American Sociologist, 20(4):305–321.
Quinney, Richard. 1979.Criminology (2nd ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.
Quinney, Richard. 1980.Class, State, and Crime (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
Rollyson, Carl. 1991.The Lives of Norman Mailer: A Biography. New York: Paragon House.
Ross, Stanley R. 1970. Obituary, Frank Tannenbaum.Hispanic-American Historical Review, 50(2):345–348.
Scheff, Thomas J. 1966.Being Mentally Ill: A Sociological Theory. Chicago: Aldine.
Sheffield, Paul Ray. 1990. “Slitting Open the Belly of the Beast.”The Threepenny Review, Winter:13–15.
Siegel, Larry J. 1992.Criminology. St. Paul, Minn.: West.
Smart, Carol. 1976.Women, Crime and Criminology: A Feminist Critique. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Tannenbaum, Frank. 1938.Crime and the Community. New York: Ginn.
Taylor, Ian, Paul Walton, and Jock Young. 1973.The New Criminology: For a Social Theory of Deviance. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Wellford, Charles. 1975. “Labelling Theory and Criminology: An Assessment.”Social Problems, 22(3):332–344.
Woolgar, Steve, and Dorothy Pawluch. 1985. “Ontological Gerrymandering: The Anatomy of Social Problems Explanations.”Social Problems, 32(3):214–227.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goode, E. Round up the usual suspects: Crime, deviance, and the limits of constructionism. Am Soc 25, 90–104 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02691992
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02691992